RESUMO
Objective To investigate the influence of curettage of uterine cavity and hysteroscopy detection before operation on detection rate of abdominal cavity and the survival rate of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Methods 120 patients with endometrial carcinoma were chosen in the period from March 2011 to December 2013 were divided into 2 groups including curettage of uterine cavity group (64 patients) with curettage of uterine cavity and hysteroscopy group (56 patients) with hysteroscopy detection according to preoperative examinations methods; and the eligible rate of specimens, the concordance rate of pathological diagnosis, the detection rate of peritoneal cytology, the overall survival rate and progression free survival rate in 3 years with follow-up of both groups were compared. Results There was no significant difference in the eligible rate of specimens and the concordance rate of pathological diagnosis between the two groups (P > 0.05). The detection rate of ascites cytology of hysteroscopy group were significantly higher than curettage of uterine cavity group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the overall survival rate and progression free survival rate in 3 years with follow-up between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Curettage of uterine cavity and hysteroscopy detection before operation on patients with endometrial carcinoma posses the same diagnosis value; And hysteroscopy detection maybe peritoneal metastasis risk, but have no effect on long-term survival and larger randomized controlled trials should be necessary.
RESUMO
Objective To investigate the influence of curettage of uterine cavity and hysteroscopy detection before operation on detection rate of abdominal cavity and the survival rate of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Methods 120 patients with endometrial carcinoma were chosen in the period from March 2011 to December 2013 were divided into 2 groups including curettage of uterine cavity group (64 patients) with curettage of uterine cavity and hysteroscopy group (56 patients) with hysteroscopy detection according to preoperative examinations methods; and the eligible rate of specimens, the concordance rate of pathological diagnosis, the detection rate of peritoneal cytology, the overall survival rate and progression free survival rate in 3 years with follow-up of both groups were compared. Results There was no significant difference in the eligible rate of specimens and the concordance rate of pathological diagnosis between the two groups (P > 0.05). The detection rate of ascites cytology of hysteroscopy group were significantly higher than curettage of uterine cavity group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the overall survival rate and progression free survival rate in 3 years with follow-up between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Curettage of uterine cavity and hysteroscopy detection before operation on patients with endometrial carcinoma posses the same diagnosis value; And hysteroscopy detection maybe peritoneal metastasis risk, but have no effect on long-term survival and larger randomized controlled trials should be necessary.