Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 40
Filtrar
1.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery ; (12): 355-362, 2023.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-990649

RESUMO

Objective:To investigate the safety and short-term efficacy of laparoscopic pro-ximal gastrectomy (LPG) for proximal gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction.Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 385 patients with proximal gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction who underwent LPG in the 15 medical centers, including the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University et al, from January 2014 to March 2022 were collected. There were 304 males and 81 females, aged (63±9)years. Of the 385 patients, 335 cases undergoing LPG were divided into the laparoscopic group and 50 cases undergoing open proximal gastrectomy were divided into the open group. Observation indicators: (1) intraoperative and postoperative situations; (2) follow-up; (3) stratified analysis. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and comparison between groups was conducted using the t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range), and comparison between groups was conducted using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Count data were described as absolute numbers, and comparison between groups was conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. Repeated measurement data were analyzed using the repeated ANOVA. Results:(1) Intraoperative and postoperative situations. The operation time, cases with reconstruction of digestive tract as esophagogastric anastomosis and esophageal-jejunal anastomosis, cases with postoperative pathological staging as stage 0?Ⅰ and stage Ⅱ?Ⅲ, duration of postoperative hospital stay, cases with postoperative early complications were (212±96)minutes, 270, 65, 177, 107, 10(range, 8?14)days, 40 in patients of the laparoscopic group, with 51 cases missing the data of postoperative pathological staging. The above indicators were (174±90)minutes, 39, 11, 22, 28, 10(range, 8?18)days, 10 in patients of the open group. There were significant differences in the opera-tion time and postoperative pathological staging between the two groups ( t=2.62, χ2=5.93, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the reconstruction of digestive tract, duration of post-operative hospital stay, postoperative early complications between the two groups ( χ2=0.19, Z=0.40, χ2=2.50, P>0.05). (2) Follow-up. Of the 385 patients,202 cases were followed up during the post-operative 12 months, including 187 cases in the laparoscopic group and 15 cases in the open group. Cases with reflux esophagitis, cases with esophageal anastomotic stenosis were 48, 11 in patients of the laparoscopic group, versus 5, 2 in patients of the open group, showing no significant difference in the above indicators between the two groups ( P>0.05). The body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin (Hb), albumin (Alb) at postoperative 6 months and 12 months were (21±3)kg/m 2, (130±15)g/L, (40±4)g/L and (21±3)kg/m 2, (132±14)g/L, (41±4)g/L in patients of the laparoscopic group, versus (21±3)kg/m 2, (121±19)g/L, (37±5)g/L and (21±3)kg/m 2, (125±21)g/L, (43±6)g/L in patients of the open group. There were significant differences in postoperative Hb between the two groups ( Fgroup=5.88, Ftime=5.49, Finteraction=19.95, P<0.05) and there were significant differences in time effect of postopera-tive BMI and Alb between the two groups ( Ftime=9.53, 49.88, P<0.05). (3) Stratified analysis. ① Incidence of postoperative of reflux esophagitis and esophageal anastomotic stenosis in patients with different reconstruction of digestive tract. Of the 202 patients, cases with reconstruction of digestive tract as esophagogastric anastomosis and esophageal-jejunal anastomosis were 168 and 34, respectively. The incidence rates of postoperative of reflux esophagitis were 26.79%(45/168)and 23.53%(8/34)in cases with reconstruction of digestive tract as esophagogastric anastomosis and esophageal-jejunal anastomosis, showing no significant difference between them ( χ2=0.16, P>0.05). Cases undergoing esophageal anastomotic stenosis were 13 in patients with reconstruction of diges-tive tract as esophagogastric anastomosis. ② The BMI, Hb, Alb in patients with different reconstruc-tion of digestive tract. The BMI, Hb, Alb were (24±3)kg/m 2, (135±20)g/L, (41±5)g/L in the 168 patients with reconstruction of digestive tract as esophagogastric anastomosis before the operation, versus (23±3)kg/m 2, (130±19)g/L, (40±4)g/L in the 34 patients with reconstruction of digestive tract as esophageal-jejunal anastomosis before the operation, showing no significant difference between them ( t=1.44, 1.77, 1.33, P>0.05). The BMI, Hb, Alb at postoperative 6 months and 12 months were (21±3)kg/m 2, (128±16)g/L, (39±4)g/L and (21±3)kg/m 2, (131±16)g/L, (41±4)g/L in the 168 patients with reconstruction of digestive tract as esophagogastric anastomosis, versus (20±4)kg/m 2, (133±13)g/L, (43±3)g/L and (21±3)kg/m 2, (135±12)g/L, (44±3)g/L in the 34 patients with reconstruction of digestive tract as esophageal-jejunal anastomosis. There were significant differences in the group effect and time effect of postoperative Alb between patients with different reconstruction of diges-tive tract ( Fgroup=15.82, Ftime=5.43, P<0.05), and there was also a significant difference in the time effect of postoperative BMI between them ( Ftime=4.22 , P<0.05). Conclusion:LPG can be used to the treatment of proximal gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction, with a good safety and short-term efficacy.

2.
Chinese Journal of Medical Instrumentation ; (6): 309-311, 2023.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-982234

RESUMO

Authenticity verification is a very important aspect of medical device registration quality management system verification of medical device. How to verify the authenticity of samples is a problem worth discussing. This study analyzes the methods of authenticity verification from the aspects of product retention sample, registration inspection report, traceability of records, hardware facilities and equipment. In order to provide reference for relevant supervisors and inspectors in the verification of registration quality management system.

3.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery ; (12): 93-95, 2022.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-930917

RESUMO

The Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery has been constantly innovating and gradually developing into the top scientific and technological journals in China since its inception in 2002. It has made important contributions to promote the digestive surgery. The journal always adheres to the policy of "focusing on improvement and popularization",attaches great importance to the quality of the content,and becomes a good partner of surgeons. It has created a high-quality academic platform to promote innovation. Furthermore,it has formed the Elite Group of Chinese Digestive Surgery to provide a broad stage for young talents. Young scholars have cooperated and innovated on this platform,inputting infinite vitality into the journal.

4.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery ; (12): 951-956, 2020.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-865146

RESUMO

Proximal gastrectomy, the surgical treatment of gastric upper adenocarcinoma or early esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma, has received more and more attention. However, pathophysiological changes after proximal gastrectomy lead to a high risk of severe gastroesophageal reflux or reflux esophagitis, such as loss of mechanical anti-regurgitation barrier and receptive relaxation, decrease of peristalsis of remnant, incoordinate contraction, pylorus spasm, which limit its widespread use. Dozens of digestive tract reconstruction methods with different anti-reflux design have been reported in recent years. These strategies could be divided into 3 categories: buffer zone method, reconstruction of mechanical anti-regurgitation barrier, speeding up gastric emptying. The authors analyze the pathophysiological changes related with gastroesophageal reflux after proximal gastrectomy from the perspective of anatomy and phy-siology, summarize the advantages and disadvantages of anti-regurgitation methods, and look forward to the development trends in the future.

5.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery ; (12): 63-71, 2020.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-865015

RESUMO

Objective To investigate the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and its risk factors after radical gastrectomy.Methods The prospective study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 2 089 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy in 22 medical centers between December 2017 and November 2018 were collected,including 380 in the Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University,351 in the Renji Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,130 in the Ruijin Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,139 in the Peking University Cancer Hospital,128 in the Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital,114 in the First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University,104 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University,104 in the Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University,103 in the Weifang People's Hospital,102 in the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital,99 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University,97 in the Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine,60 in the Hangzhou First People's Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine,48 in the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center,29 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University,26 in the Lishui Municipal Central Hospital,26 in the Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital,23 in the Jiangsu Province Hospital,13 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University,7 in the Second Hospital of Jilin University,4 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,2 in the Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital of Capital Medical University.Observation indicators:(1) the incidence of POPF after radical gastrectomy;(2) treatment of grade B POPF after radical gastrectomy;(3) analysis of clinicopathological data;(4) analysis of surgical data;(5) risk factors for grade B POPF after radical gastrectomy.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD,and comparison between groups was analyzed using ANOVA.Count data were described as absolute numbers or percentages,and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test.Univariate analysis was conducted using the t test or chi-square test based on data excluding missing data of clinicopathological and surgical data.Multivariate analysis was conducted using the Logistic regression model based on factors with P<0.20 in univariate analysis.Results There were 2 089 patients screened for eligibility,including 1 512 males,576 females and 1 without sex information,aged (62± 11)years.The body mass index (BMI) was (23±3) kg/m2.(1) The incidence of POPF after radical gastrectomy:the total incidence rate of POPF in the 2 089 patients was 20.728%(433/2 089).The incidence rates of biochemical fistula,grade B pancreatic fistula,and grade C pancreatic fistula were 19.627%(410/2 089),1.101%(23/2 089),0,respectively.(2) Treatment of grade B POPF after radical gastrectomy:2 of 23 patients with grade B POPF after radical gastrectomy had drainage tube placed for more than 21 days and received anti-infective therapy.Four of 23 patients with grade B POPF after radical gastrectomy had ascites detected by imaging examination,of which 2 received peritoneal drainage guided by ultrasound,1 received failed puncture drainage,1 received no puncture drainage,and they were given anti-infective therapy.Eleven of 23 patients with grade B POPF after radical gastrectomy had no ascites detected by imaging examinations,and they were given anti-infective therapy and inhibitors of pancreas secretion for clinical manifestation as fever or elevated white blood cells.Six patients with no typical clinical manifestations were given somatostatin to inhibite pancreas secretion and prolonged duration of abdominal drainage tube placement (with a median time of 7 days).All the 23 patients recovered well after treatment,without reoperation.(3) Analysis of clinicopathological data:for the 2 089 patients,BMI,cases with or without neoadjuvant therapy were (23±3) kg/m2,1 487,160 of patients without pancreatic fistula,(23±3)kg/m2,386,22 of patients with biochemical fistula,and (24±3)kg/m2,22,1 of patents with grade B pancreatic fistula,showing significant differences between the three groups (F=5.787,x2 =8.269,P<0.05).(4) Analysis of surgical data:for the 2 089 patients,cases with open surgery,laparoscopic assisted surgery,totally laparoscopic surgery (surgical method),cases with D1 lymph lode dissection,D2 lymph lode dissection,and other lymph lode dissection (range of lymph lode dissection),cases with no omentectomy,partial omentectomy,and total omentectomy (range of omentectomy),cases with no usage of energy facility,usage of CUSA,LigaSure,LigaSure+CUSA as energy facility,cases with or without biological glue,the number of lymph node dissection were 737,624,292,24,1 580,51,418,834,381,63,1 530,23,16,1 431,201,33±14 of patients without pancreatic fistula,146,189,74,11,389,9,110,171,128,35,359,6,9,378,31,31± 14 of patients with biochemical fistula,and 14,5,4,0,20,3,6,13,4,2,18,1,2,22,1,37±16 of patients with grade B pancreatic fistula,showing significant differences between the three groups (x2=15.578,9.397,15.023,28.245,8.359,F=4.945,P< 0.05).(5) Risk factors for grade B POPF after radical gastrectomy:results of univariate analysis showed that usage of energy facility was a related factor for grade B POPF after radical gastrectomy (x2=9.914,P<0.05).Results of multivariate analysis showed that laparoscopic assisted surgery,combined evisceration,application of LigaSure + CUSA,the number of lymph lode dissection were independent factors for for grade B POPF after radical gastrectomy (odds ratio=0.168,3.922,9.250,1.030,95% confidence interval:0.036-0.789,1.031-14.919,1.036-82.602,1.001-1.059,P<0.05).Conclusions The incidence of grade B POPF after radical gastrectomy is relatively low.Laparoscopic assisted surgery,combined evisceration,application of LigaSure + CUSA,and the number of lymph lode dissection are independent risk factors for grade B POPF.Trial Registration:This study was registrated at ClinicalTrial.gov in United States with the registration number of NCT03391687.

6.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery ; (12): 10-14, 2020.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-799041

RESUMO

Gastric carcinoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor and gastric neuroendocrine tumor are the most common gastric neoplasms. A series of researches in 2019 showed that the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic gastrectomy in the treatment of both early and advanced gastric cancer patients are similar to open surgeries, providing a high-level evidence-based medical basis for the promotion of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment for gastric cancer. In multidisciplinary treatment and perioperative chemoradiotherapy, major research results have also been published, and clinical researches in China are gradually gaining international recognition and attention. Although the application of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has made progress, the first-line therapy after gastric cancer surgery has not been established. In the field of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, laparoscopic surgery has gradually been recognized, and surgical treatment of patients with advanced drug resistance still has its value. In terms of gastric neuroendocrine tumors, the latest researches showed that surgical methods should be selected according to tumor characteristics, and gastric adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine components may have a worse prognosis.

7.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery ; (12): 63-71, 2020.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-798908

RESUMO

Objective@#To investigate the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and its risk factors after radical gastrectomy.@*Methods@#The prospective study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 2 089 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy in 22 medical centers between December 2017 and November 2018 were collected, including 380 in the Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, 351 in the Renji Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 130 in the Ruijin Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 139 in the Peking University Cancer Hospital, 128 in the Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, 114 in the First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University, 104 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 104 in the Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, 103 in the Weifang People′s Hospital, 102 in the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 99 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, 97 in the Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 60 in the Hangzhou First People′s Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 48 in the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 29 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi′an Jiaotong University, 26 in the Lishui Municipal Central Hospital, 26 in the Guangdong Provincial People′s Hospital, 23 in the Jiangsu Province Hospital, 13 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 7 in the Second Hospital of Jilin University, 4 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 2 in the Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital of Capital Medical University. Observation indicators: (1) the incidence of POPF after radical gastrectomy; (2) treatment of grade B POPF after radical gastrectomy; (3) analysis of clinicopathological data; (4) analysis of surgical data; (5) risk factors for grade B POPF after radical gastrectomy. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD, and comparison between groups was analyzed using ANOVA. Count data were described as absolute numbers or percentages, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test. Univariate analysis was conducted using the t test or chi-square test based on data excluding missing data of clinico-pathological and surgical data. Multivariate analysis was conducted using the Logistic regression model based on factors with P<0.20 in univariate analysis.@*Results@#There were 2 089 patients screened for eligibility, including 1 512 males, 576 females and 1 without sex information, aged (62±11)years. The body mass index (BMI) was (23±3)kg/m2. (1) The incidence of POPF after radical gastrectomy: the total incidence rate of POPF in the 2 089 patients was 20.728%(433/2 089). The incidence rates of biochemical fistula, grade B pancreatic fistula, and grade C pancreatic fistula were 19.627%(410/2 089), 1.101%(23/2 089), 0, respectively. (2) Treatment of grade B POPF after radical gastrectomy: 2 of 23 patients with grade B POPF after radical gastrectomy had drainage tube placed for more than 21 days and received anti-infective therapy. Four of 23 patients with grade B POPF after radical gastrectomy had ascites detected by imaging examination, of which 2 received peritoneal drainage guided by ultrasound, 1 received failed puncture drainage, 1 received no puncture drainage, and they were given anti-infective therapy. Eleven of 23 patients with grade B POPF after radical gastrectomy had no ascites detected by imaging examinations, and they were given anti-infective therapy and inhibitors of pancreas secretion for clinical manifestation as fever or elevated white blood cells. Six patients with no typical clinical manifestations were given somatostatin to inhibite pancreas secretion and prolonged duration of abdominal drainage tube placement (with a median time of 7 days). All the 23 patients recovered well after treatment, without reoperation. (3) Analysis of clinicopathological data: for the 2 089 patients, BMI, cases with or without neoadjuvant therapy were (23±3)kg/m2, 1 487, 160 of patients without pancreatic fistula, (23±3)kg/m2, 386, 22 of patients with biochemical fistula, and (24±3)kg/m2, 22, 1 of patents with grade B pancreatic fistula, showing significant differences between the three groups (F=5.787, χ2=8.269, P<0.05). (4) Analysis of surgical data: for the 2 089 patients, cases with open surgery, laparoscopic assisted surgery, totally laparoscopic surgery (surgical method), cases with D1 lymph lode dissection, D2 lymph lode dissection, and other lymph lode dissection (range of lymph lode dissection), cases with no omentectomy, partial omentectomy, and total omentectomy (range of omentectomy), cases with no usage of energy facility, usage of CUSA, LigaSure, LigaSure+ CUSA as energy facility, cases with or without biological glue, the number of lymph node dissection were 737, 624, 292, 24, 1 580, 51, 418, 834, 381, 63, 1 530, 23, 16, 1 431, 201, 33±14 of patients without pancreatic fistula, 146, 189, 74, 11, 389, 9, 110, 171, 128, 35, 359, 6, 9, 378, 31, 31±14 of patients with biochemical fistula, and 14, 5, 4, 0, 20, 3, 6, 13, 4, 2, 18, 1, 2, 22, 1, 37±16 of patients with grade B pancreatic fistula, showing significant differences between the three groups (χ2=15.578, 9.397, 15.023, 28.245, 8.359, F=4.945, P<0.05). (5) Risk factors for grade B POPF after radical gastrectomy: results of univariate analysis showed that usage of energy facility was a related factor for grade B POPF after radical gastrectomy (χ2=9.914, P<0.05). Results of multivariate analysis showed that laparoscopic assisted surgery, combined evisceration, application of LigaSure + CUSA, the number of lymph lode dissection were independent factors for for grade B POPF after radical gastrectomy (odds ratio=0.168, 3.922, 9.250, 1.030, 95% confidence interval: 0.036-0.789, 1.031-14.919, 1.036-82.602, 1.001-1.059, P<0.05).@*Conclusions@#The incidence of grade B POPF after radical gastrectomy is relatively low. Laparoscopic assisted surgery, combined evisceration, application of LigaSure + CUSA, and the number of lymph lode dissection are independent risk factors for grade B POPF. Trial Registration: This study was registrated at ClinicalTrial.gov in United States with the registration number of NCT03391687.

8.
Chinese Journal of Surgery ; (12): 5-8, 2020.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-798703

RESUMO

As tumors originated from mesenchymal tissue, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) has its own typical history. For the idea of treatment for GIST at different historical periods, the role and value of surgery for the treatment of GIST keep changing. Laparoscopy and endoscopy will have the role they deserved. With the understanding of pathogenesis of GIST, targeted chemotherapy will be more and more accurate and individualized. How to improve the overall therapeutic effect of GIST, especially for the patients with the high risk and drug-resistance, is the dilemma and challenges for the surgeons.

9.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery ; (12): 762-766, 2019.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-810853

RESUMO

Objective@#To evaluate the efficacy of reinforcement on duodenal stump using single purse-string suture during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer in preventing duodenal stump leakage.@*Methods@#A descriptive cohort study was conducted to retrospectively collect clinical data of 211 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y or Billroth Ⅱ reconstruction and reinforcement on duodenal stump using laparoscopic single purse-string suture in Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University between January 2013 and December 2016. Of 211 patients, 136 were male and 75 were female with mean age of (57.5±11.1)(24 to 87) years. Tumors locating at gastric upper 1/3, middle 1/3 and low 1/3 were found in 62, 68 and 81 patients respectively. Eighty-three cases underwent total gastrectomy, 128 underwent distal subtotal gastrectomy, 107 underwent Roux-en-Y reconstruction and 104 underwent Billroth II reconstruction. The procedure of reinforcement on duodenal stump using single purse-string suture during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy was as follows: (1) after cutting the duodenal stump to about 2.0 cm in length, use a 3-0 single-strand absorbable suture to make a muscle layer purse at a distance of 1.0 to 1.5 cm from the duodenal stump; (2) use the purse line to make a slipknot; (3) push the duodenum stump into the purse with a needle holder or grasper; (4) tighten the knot of the purse string, and then make 4 to 5 knots for reinforcement. Postoperative complications were defined and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo grading criteria, and the incidence of early complications was recorded. Clinicopathologic features and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.@*Results@#All patients completed operations successfully. The mean time of laparoscopic single purse-string suture was (5.1±1.6) (3.6 to 10.2) minutes. Postoperative early complication occurred in 31 cases (14.7%), of whom 27 cases developed surgery-related complications (12.8%), including 7 cases (3.3%) of peritoneal infection, 6 (2.8%) of pancreatic leakage, 4 (1.9%) of wound infection, 4 (1.9%) of gastroplegia, 2 (0.9%) of peritoneal hemorrhage, 2 (0.9%) of intestinal obstruction, 2 (0.9%) of lymphatic leakage, and no duodenal stump leakage; while 4 cases (1.9%) developed internal non-surgical complication, including 3 cases (1.4%) of pulmonary infection and 1 (0.5%) of cardiovascular event. The patient with peritoneal hemorrhage was healed after re-operation and all other patients were discharged uneventfully after conservative treatment. Four cases (1.9%) developed complications beyond grade III a of Clavien-Dindo criteria.@*Conclusion@#Reinforcement on duodenal stump using laparoscopic single purse-string suture during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y or Billroth II reconstruction is simple and effective, and can prevent the risk of development of duodenal stump leakage.

10.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery ; (12): 94-97, 2019.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-774420

RESUMO

Tumor deposit (TD) is a common histopathological finding in gastric cancer. With the improved ability of lymphadenectomy and pathological examination, the positive rate and harvested number of TD are also increasing. The role of TD in staging and prognosis prediction for gastric cancer patients is getting more attention. However, due to the lack of standardization and unification, the denomination, definition and diagnostic criteria are still controversial. The previous studies on the definition and diagnostic criteria of TD were reviewed to standardize the items and improve the awareness. TD is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer. Each TD should be counted separately as a lymph node in the final pN determination according to TNM staging system of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) or American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) or Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. But this rule is just an experience-based practice, without support from high-level evidence. Several studies have tried to incorporate TD into TNM staging system to improve the accuracy and discriminative ability. With the wide use of the 8th TNM staging system, how to incorporate TD into the new staging system in an easy and reasonable way still needs more investigations.


Assuntos
Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Linfonodos , Patologia , Cirurgia Geral , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Métodos , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas , Diagnóstico , Patologia , Terapêutica
11.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery ; (12): 250-258, 2019.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-743966

RESUMO

Objective To investigate the prognostic factors of radical gastrectomy for stage Ⅲ gastric cancer and predictive value of metastatic lymph node ratio for prognosis.Methods The retrospective case-control study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 995 patients with stage Ⅲ gastric cancer who were admitted to the Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University between January 2003 and December 2014 were collected.There were 690 males and 305 females,aged from 20 to 75 years,with an average age of 61 years.After clinical staging according to results of preoperative accessory examinations,patients with early gastric cancer underwent D1+ lymphadenectomy,patients with advanced gastric cancer underwent D2 lymphadenectomy and patients with serosa invasion underwent D2+ lymphadenectomy.Observation indicators:(1) treatment situations;(2) follow-up and survival situations;(3) prognostic factors analysis after operation;(4) stratified analysis:① stratified analysis of tumor pathological N staging;② stratified analysis of number of lymph node dissected;③ stratified analysis of tumor pathological TNM staging;(5) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Patients were followed up using outpatient examination and telephone interview to detect postoperative survival up to January 2016.The overall survival time was from the operation data to last follow-up or time of death.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD.The survival rate and curve were respectively calculated and drawn by the Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test was used for survival analysis.The COX proportional hazard model was used for univariate and multivariate analysis.The ROC curve and area under curve (AUC) were used to check the accuracy of number of positive lymph nodes and metastatic lymph node ratio for prognosis.Comparison of the AUC was analyzed by the Z test.Results (1) Treatment situations:of 995 patients underging gastrectomy,677 underwent distal gastrectomy,85 underwent proximal gastrectomy,233 underwent total gastrectomy.There were 117 undergoing D1+ lymphadenectomy and 878 undergoing D2 lymphadenectomy or D2+ lymphadenectomy.The number of lymph node dissected,number of positive lymph nodes,metastatic lymph node ratio were 27± 12,10± 9 and 0.41±0.28,respectively.(2) Follow-up and survival situations:995 patients were followed up for (35± 32)months.During the follow-up,the 1-,3-,5-year overall survival rates were 77.9%,47.8%,36.2%.(3) Prognostic factors analysis after operation:results of univariate analysis showed that sex,tumor histological type,vascular embolus,degree of tumor invasion,tumor pathological N staging,number of lymph node dissected,metastatic lymph node ratio,tumor pathological TNM staging were related factors affecting prognosis of radical gastrectomy for stage Ⅲ gasteric cancer (hazard ratio =0.817,1.486,1.268,2.173,1.957,1.737,3.357,2.169,95% confidence interval:0.686-0.973,1.059-2.086,1.074-1.497,1.195-3.954,1.480-2.588,1.390-2.170,2.476-4.602,1.740-2.704,P<0.05).Results of multivariate analysis showed that sex,tumor histological type,tumor pathological N staging,number of lymph node dissected,metastatic lymph node ratio,tumor pathological TNM staging were independent factors affecting prognosis of radical gastrectomy for stage Ⅲ gastric cancer (hazard ratio =0.805,1.476,0.237,1.475,3.811,3.600,95% confidence interval:0.673-0.963,1.049-2.087,0.083-0.678,1.140-1.909,2.259-6.428,1.317-9.839,P<0.05).(4) Stratified analysis:of the 995 patients,the postoperative l-,3-,5-year overall survival rates were 93.7%,69.6%,60.5% in the patients with metastatic lymph node ratio ≤ 0.1,86.9%,60.6%,44.3% in the patients with 0.1 < metastatic lymph node ratio ≤0.4 and 64.3%,28.9%,21.0% in the patients with metastatic lymph node ratio > 0.4,showing a statistically significant difference (x2 =121.300,P<0.05).There were statistically significant differences between patients with metastatic lymph node ratio ≤0.1 and patients with 0.1< metastatic lymph node ratio ≤0.4,between patients with metastatic lymph node ratio ≤0.1 and patients with metastatic lymph node ratio >0.4 (x2=7.580,65.320,P<0.05).There was a statistically significant difference between patients with 0.1 < metastatic lymph node ratio ≤0.4 and patients with metastatic lymph node ratio>0.4 (x2 =80.806,P<0.05).① Stratified analysis of tumor pathological N staging:the average metastatic lymph node ratio was 0.09 in the 132 stage N1 patients,who were divided into the patients with metastatic lymph node ratio ≤ 0.1 and > 0.1.The postoperative 1-,3-,5-year overall survival rates were 92.2%,68.6%,59.1% in the 108 patients with metastatic lymph node ratio ≤ 0.1 and 79.2%,32.8%,21.9% in the 24 patients with metastatic lymph node ratio >0.1,respectively,showing a statistically significant difference (x2 =14.499,P<0.05).The average metastatic lymph node ratio was 0.23 in the 265 stage N2 patients,who were divided into the patients with metastatic lymph node ratio ≤0.2 and >0.2.The postoperative 1-,3-,5-year overall survival rates were 92.3%,73.8%,61.0% in the 138 patients with metastatic lymph node ratio ≤0.2 and 76.5%,40.1%,22.2% in the 127 patients with metastatic lymph node ratio >0.2,respectively,showing a statistically significant difference (x2 =42.536,P<0.05).The average metastatic lymph node ratio was 0.56 in the 598 stage N3 patients,who were divided into the patients with metastatic lymph node ratio ≤0.4 and >0.4.The postoperative 1-,3-,5-year overall survival rates were 88.5%,62.8%,47.0% in the 194 patients with metastatic lymph node ratio ≤ 0.4 and 64.3%,29.8%,21.0% in the 404 patients with metastatic lymph node ratio >0.4,respectively,showing a statistically significant difference (x2 =51.860,P< 0.05).② Stratified analysis of number of lymph node dissected:7 of 117 patients with the number of lymph node dissected < 15 had metastatic lymph node ratio ≤0.1,who were divided into patients with metastatic lymph node ratio ≤0.4 and >0.4.The postoperative 1-,3-,5-year overall survival rates were 78.2%,40.0%,28.6% in the 44 patients with metastatic lymph node ratio ≤0.4 and 78.1%,18.7%,12.9% in the 73 patients with metastatic lymph node ratio>0.4,respectively,showing a statistically significant difference (x2 =4.727,P<0.05).③ Stratified analysis of tumor pathological TNM staging:of 262 patients with stage Ⅲa gastric cancer,the postoperative 1-,3-,5-year overall survival rates were 88.5%,65.0%,54.3% in the 230 patients with metastatic lymph node ratio ≤0.4 and 77.5%,35.4%,29.5% in the 32 patients with metastatic lymph node ratio >0.4,respectively,showing a statistically significant difference (x2 =6.132,P<0.05).Of 296 patients with stage Ⅲb gastric cancer,the postoperative 1-,3-,5-year overall survival rates were 84.4%,60.7%,42.7% in the 200 patients with metastatic lymph node ratio ≤ 0.4 and 59.9%,26.8%,21.7% in the 96 patients with metastatic lymph node ratio >0.4,respectively,showing a statistically significant difference (x2 =23.699,P<0.05).Of 437 patients with stage Ⅲ c gastric cancer,the postoperative 1-,3-,5-year overall survival rates were 84.7%,59.9%,38.7% in the 133 patients with metastatic lymph node ratio ≤0.4 and 64.0%,27.9%,18.3% in the 304 patients with metastatic lymph node ratio >0.4,respectively,showing a statistically significant difference (x2=36.215,P< 0.05).(5) ROC curve:ROC curves of postoperative overall survival rates in patients with stage Ⅲ gastric cancer were drawn using the number of positive lymph nodes and metastatic lymph node ratio,of which AUC were 0.619 (95% confidence interval:O.588-0.649) and 0.706 (95% confidence interval:0.677-0.734),showing a statistically significant difference (Z=8.842,P<0.05).Conclusions Sex,tumor histological type,tumor pathological N staging,number of lymph node dissected,metastatic lymph node ratio,tumor pathological TNM staging are independent factors affecting prognosis of radical gastrectomy for stage Ⅲ gastric cancer.There is different prognosis of patients with different metastatic lymph node ratios in the subgroup of the same tumor pathological TNM staging,number of lymph node dissected,tumor pathological TNM staging.Compared with tumor pathological N staging,metastatic lymph node ratio has a more accurate predictive value for prognosis.

12.
Chinese Journal of General Surgery ; (12): 53-57, 2019.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-734813

RESUMO

Objective To investigate the expression and clinical significance of pro-inflammation S100A9 protein in intestinal type gastric cancer.Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological materials of the 278 patients who were diagnosed as Lauren classification intestinal gastric cancer and underwent surgical treatment between January and December 2008 at the Department of General Surgery,Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University.Immunohistochemistry was used to analyze the expression of S100A9 protein in tumor tissues and para-tumor tissues.Results High expression of S100A9 protein was associated with the depth of tumor invasion (P =0.013),lymph node metastasis (81.4%,53.9%,47.3% vs.84.7%,69.3%,60.7%,x2 =4.220,P =0.041) and TNM stage (P =0.010).The overall survival rate of these patients with high expression of S100A9 protein was significantly lower than those with low expression of S100A9 protein.In stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ patients,the overall survival rate of these patients with high expression of S100A9 protein was significantly lower than those with low expression of S100A9 protein.Moreover,for those patients who received postoperative chemotherapy,the prognosis of the patients with high expression of S100A9 protein was poorer than those with low expression.By multivariable analysis,the expression of S100A9 protein was not an independent risk factor for the prognosis of intestinal gastric cancer patients.Conclusions High expression of S100A9 protein in intestinal gastric cancer was associated with poor prognosis.

13.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery ; (12): 24-26, 2019.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-733544

RESUMO

With the further application of evidencebased medicine and the change of disease spectrum,gastrointestinal surgery is facing the novel challenge and opportunity.Systemic quality control of surgery will have positive effects on the subject development.Absence of high level of evidence,the popularization of mini-invasive surgery should be carried out cautiously.Standardization of definition of complications and unified management will be helpful to the clinical researches,prevention and treatment of complications.Conception and implementation of multidisciplinary team and enhanced recovery after surgery will provide every patient individualized and standard treatment.

14.
Chinese Journal of Surgery ; (12): 561-563, 2018.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-807081

RESUMO

With the development of medical concepts and technology, the surgical treatment of gastrointestinal cancer is gradually moving towards a new era. Chinese gastrointestinal surgeons are building up our own high-level evidence in evidence-based medicine, with tremendous clinical trials carrying out in gastrointestinal cancers. Besides, standardized procedure of diagnosis and treatment should be promoted. More personalized schemes are needed. The model of multidisciplinary team can be more widely and deeply applied. And the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery should be more operable. To keep pace with the times, the gastrointestinal surgeons have to seek for innovative technology and new ideas.

15.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery ; (12): 121-125, 2018.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-338400

RESUMO

Many retrospective and cohort studies have shown that laparoscopic total gastrectomy(LTG) has advantages of less trauma, quicker recovery and better incision than open total gastrectomy, and is not inferior to laparotomy in safety and the short- and long-term outcomes, so it has been widely applied. However there is still a lack of high level evidence-based basis. At present, several prospective multicenter clinical studies are being carried out in China, Japan and South Korea which have high incidence of gastric cancer to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of LTG and evaluate its long-term outcomes as well. A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the safety of laparoscopic and open radical gastrectomy(CLASS-02 Research) conducted by Professor Sun Yihong, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, is under way. The subjects of this study were the patients with clinical stage I(, the lesion locating in the gastric body, gastric fundus, or the esophagogastric junction (not involving the cardia dentate line), who were expected to be treated with total gastrectomy. The primary outcome measures were early operative morbidity and mortality and the secondary outcome measures were early postoperative recovery course and postoperative hospital stay. It is believed that results of the study will provide a high level evidence-based basis for the safety of LTG. The ongoing JCOG-1401 study in Japan aims to assess the feasibility and safety of LTG and LAPG for the treatment of early gastric cancer. LTG (Roux-en-Y reconstruction) or LAPG (double-tract or jejunal interposition reconstruction) will be performed in patients with clinical stage I( gastric cancer in this study. The primary endpoint of the study is the incidence of anastomotic leakage, and the secondary endpoints are proportion of patients converted to open surgery, the time to the first flatus, analgesic requirement, postoperative body temperature, the overall survival and relapse-free survival. The follow-up time is at least 5 years, and the results will also effectively evaluate the long-term efficacy of LTG and LAPG in the treatment for early gastric cancer. No.10 lymph nodes dissection of D2 total gastrectomy is a major difficulty in LTG. Japanese JCOG-0110 study has showed that for proximal gastric cancer patients without involvement of the greater curvature of the stomach, routine splenectomy for No.10 lymph nodes dissection is not recommended. In this regard, Professor Huang Changming, Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University, led the ongoing CLASS-04 study to evaluate the safety, feasibility and clinical efficacy of laparoscopic No.10 lymph node dissection with spleen preservation for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer locating in the upper part of the stomach. The ongoing CLASS-02 and JCOG-1401 studies will answer whether LTG is suitable for the treatment of early gastric cancer. We believe that in the absence of high level evidence-based basis, LTG should be applied cautiously to advanced gastric cancer, and LTG for early gastric cancer patients should also be operated by experienced surgeons.

16.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery ; (12): 605-611, 2018.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-699168

RESUMO

Objective To compare the differences and clinical value of prognostic evaluation between American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system 7th edition and 8th edition for gastric cancer (GC).Methods The retrospective case-control study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 1 383 GC patients who were admitted to the First People's Hospital of Changzhou between January 2008 and August 2012 were collected.Distal gastrectomy,proximal gastrectomy + pyloroplasty or total gastrectomy were performed according to preoperative evaluation and intraoperative exploration.Observation indicators:(1) surgical and postoperative situations;(2) follow-up and survival situations;(3) T staging comparison between AJCC TNM staging system 7th edition and 8th edition;(4) N staging comparison of AJCC TNM staging system 8th edition;(5) prognostic analysis in N staging of AJCC TNM staging system 8th edition;(6) TNM staging comparison between AJCC TNM staging system 7th edition and 8th edition;(7) prognostic analysis in different TNM staging between AJCC TNM staging system 7th edition and 8th edition.Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect postoperative survival up to October 2017.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as x ± s.Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range).The survival curve and survival rate were respectively drawn and calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method,and the Log-rank test was used for survival analysis.Results (1) Surgical and postoperative situations:1 383 GC patients underwent successful radical gastrectomy,including 923 with distal gastrectomy,165 with proximal gastrectomy and 295 with total gastrectomy.Of 1 383 patients,115 with postoperative complications were improved by symptomatic treatment,including 87 with surgical complications and 28 with non-surgical complications.Postoperative pathological examinations:total number of intraoperative lymph node dissection and number of lymph node metastasis were 25± 12 and 7±4;577 didn't have lymph node metastasis and 806 had regional lymph node metastasis;308 were in early GC and 1 075 in advanced GC.(2) Follow-up and survival situations:1 383 patients were followed up for 1-117 months,with a median time of 34 months.The 1-,3-and 5-year survival rates of 1 383 patients were respectively 90.5%,71.9% and 61.1%.(3) T staging comparison between AJCC TNM staging system 7th edition and 8th edition:T staging definition between AJCC TNM staging system 7th edition and 8th edition was identical.T staging of 1 383 patients:308,192,65,628 and 190 were respectively detected in T1,T2,T3,T4a and T4b stagings.(4) N staging comparison between AJCC TNM staging system 7th edition and 8th edition:N staging definition between AJCC TNM staging system 7th edition and 8th edition was identical.N staging of 1 383 patients:577,255,207,230 and 114 were respectively detected in N0,N1,N2,N3a and N3b stagings.N3a and N3b were classified as N3 staging of AJCC TNM staging system 7thedition,but they were classified as independent staging of AJCC TNM staging system 8th edition.(5) Prognostic analysis in N staging of AJCC TNM staging system 8th edition:5-year survival rate of patients in N0,N1,N2,N3a and N3b stagings was respectively 85.6%,76.5%,59.4%,45.2% and 32.5% based on AJCC TNM staging system 8th edition,with a statistically significant difference in survival (x2 =394.400,P<0.05).There was a statistically significant difference between N0 and N 1 stagings (x2 =45.630,P<0.05),between N 1 and N2 stagings (x2 =19.470,P<0.05),between N2 and N3a stagings (x2 =7.602,P<0.05) and between N3a and N3b stagings (x2=13.020,P<0.05).(6) TNM staging comparison between AJCC TNM staging system 7th edition and 8th edition:TNM staging of 366 patients had changes,including 2 in T1N3b staging,2 in T2N3b staging,18 in T3N3b staging,120 in T4aN2 staging,149 in T4aN3a staging,34 in T4bN0 staging and 41 in T4bN2 staging;364 were detected in staging Ⅲ in 7th edition and 8th edition,and sub-staging of staging Ⅲ had a change;2 in T1N3b of ⅡB staging were redistricted into Ⅲ B staging based on AJCC TNM staging system 8th edition.(7) Prognostic analysis in different TNM staging between AJCC TNM staging system 7th edition and 8th edition:according to 7th edition,cases and 5-year survival rate were respectively 247,89.5% in Ⅰ A staging and 147,83.7% in Ⅰ B staging and 77,75.9% in ⅡA staging and 207,70.5% in ⅡB staging and 136,61.0% in ⅢA staging and 236,37.5% in Ⅲ B staging and 333,35.4% in Ⅲ C staging,with a statistically significant difference in survival among sub-stagings (x2 =228.800,P<0.05).There was a statistically significant difference in survival among Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ stagings (x2=189.000,P<0.05) and between ⅢA and ⅢB or ⅢC stagings (x2=22.710,18.010,P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in survival between Ⅰ A and Ⅰ B stagings (x2=0.179,P>0.05),between Ⅱ A and Ⅱ B stagings (x2 =0.265,P>0.05),and between Ⅲ B and Ⅲ C stagings (x2 =1.550,P>0.05).According to 8th edition,cases and 5-year survival rate were respectively 247,89.5% in Ⅰ A staging and 147,83.7% in Ⅰ B staging and 77,75.9% in Ⅱ A staging and 205,70.7% in Ⅱ B staging and 288,53.8% in ⅢA staging and 258,37.3% in ⅢB staging and 161,28.5% in ⅢC staging,with a statistically significant difference in survival among sub-stagings (x2=234.900,P < 0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in survival between Ⅰ A and Ⅰ B stagings (x2 =0.179,P>0.05) and between Ⅱ A and ⅡB stagings (x2 =0.564,P>0.05).There was statistically significant differences in survival between Ⅲ A and Ⅲ B or ⅢC stagings (x2 =29.790,43.060,P<0.05) and between Ⅲ B and Ⅲ C stagings (x2 =7.494,P<0.05).Further analysis showed that changes of TNM staging system between 7th edition and 8th edition were in T3N3b,T4aN2,T4aN3a,T4bN0 and T4bN2 stagings,5-year survival rate in above stagings was respectively 16.7%,35.8%,30.2%,47.1% and 26.8%,with statistically significant differences in survival between T3N3b and T4aN2,T4aN3a,T4bN0 and T4bN2 stagings (x2 =19.590,8.039,12.070,3.853,P<0.05),between T4aN2 and T4aN3a,T4bN2 stagings (x2 =6.529,3.859,P < 0.05),between T4aN3a and T4bN0 stagings (x2 =10.400,P<0.05) and between T4bN0 and T4bN2 stagings (x2=4.636,P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in survival between T4aN2 and T4bN0 stagings (x2 =3.607,P>0.05) and between T4aN3a and T4bN2 stagings (x2 =0.029,P>0.05).Conclusions Compared with AJCC TNM staging system 7th edition,N3a and N3b stagings are classified as independent staging in AJCC TNM staging system 8th edition,and 8th edition is more accurate in prognostic evaluation of GC patients in stage Ⅲ.

17.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery ; (12): 560-563, 2018.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-699161

RESUMO

The strategies for prevention and treatment of recent complications after radical gastrectomy should be of equal emphasis on both theory and technology.Systematic prevention is the fundamental strategy,and adequate preoperative assessment and preparation are the basis.A reasonable extension of the radical gastrectomy and standard and refined surgical procedures could reduce the occurrence of complications.In addition,identifying these complications timely and taking effective treatments promptly according to the clinical context are the keys to reducing the treatment cycle and decreasing the mortality.

18.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery ; (12): 47-52, 2017.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-303912

RESUMO

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To establish an evaluation model of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer, and to assess its clinical significance.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Clinical and pathologic data of the consecutive cases of gastric cancer admitted between April 2015 and December 2015 in Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 710 patients were enrolled in the study after 18 patients with other distant metastasis were excluded. The correlations between peritoneal metastasis and different factors were studied through univariate (Pearson's test or Fisher's exact test) and multivariate analyses (Binary Logistic regression). Independent predictable factors for peritoneal metastasis were combined to establish a risk evaluation model (nomogram). The nomogram was created with R software using the 'rms' package. In the nomogram, each factor had different scores, and every patient could have a total score by adding all the scores of each factor. A higher total score represented higher risk of peritoneal metastasis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the established nomogram. Delong. Delong. Clarke-Pearson test was used to compare the difference of the area under the curve (AUC). The cut-off value was determined by the AUC, when the ROC curve had the biggest AUC, the model had the best sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Among 710 patients, 47 patients had peritoneal metastasis (6.6%), including 30 male (30/506, 5.9%) and 17 female (17/204, 8.3%); 31 were ≥ 60 years old (31/429, 7.2%); 38 had tumor ≥ 3 cm(38/461, 8.2%). Lauren classification indicated that 2 patients were intestinal type(2/245, 0.8%), 8 patients were mixed type(8/208, 3.8%), 11 patients were diffuse type(11/142, 7.7%), and others had no associated data. CA19-9 of 13 patients was ≥ 37 kU/L(13/61, 21.3%); CA125 of 11 patients was ≥ 35 kU/L(11/36, 30.6%); CA72-4 of 11 patients was ≥ 10 kU/L(11/39, 28.2%). Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of 26 patients was ≥ 2.37(26/231, 11.3%). Multivariate analysis showed that Lauren classification (HR=8.95, 95%CI:1.32-60.59, P=0.025), CA125(HR=17.45, 95%CI:5.54-54.89, P=0.001), CA72-4(HR=20.06, 95%CI:5.05-79.68, P=0.001), and NLR (HR=4.16, 95%CI:1.17-14.75, P=0.032) were independent risk factors of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. In the nomogram, the highest score was 241, including diffuse or mixed Lauren classification (54 score), CA125 ≥ 35 kU/L (66 score), CA72-4 ≥ 10 kU/L (100 score), and NLR ≥ 2.37 (21 score), which represented a highest risk of peritoneal metastasis (more than 90%). The AUC of nomogram was 0.912, which was superior than any single variable (AUC of Lauren classification: 0.678; AUC of CA125: 0.720; AUC of CA72-4: 0.792; AUC of NLR: 0.613, all P=0.000). The total score of nomogram increased according to the TNM stage, and was highest in the peritoneal metastasis group (F=49.1, P=0.000). When the cut-off value calculated by ROC analysis was set at 140, the model could best balanced the sensitivity (0.79) and the specificity (0.87). Only 5% of patients had peritoneal metastasis when their nomogram scores were lower than 140, while 58% of patients had peritoneal metastasis when their scores were ≥ 140(χ=69.1, P=0.000).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The risk evaluation model established with Lauren classification, CA125, CA72-4 and NLR can effectively predict the risk of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer, and provide the reference to preoperative staging and choice of therapeutic strategy.</p>


Assuntos
Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antígenos Glicosídicos Associados a Tumores , Sangue , Área Sob a Curva , Antígeno Ca-125 , Sangue , Antígeno CA-19-9 , Sangue , Contagem de Leucócitos , Modelos Logísticos , Linfócitos , Patologia , Metástase Neoplásica , Diagnóstico , Neutrófilos , Patologia , Nomogramas , Neoplasias Peritoneais , Prognóstico , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Métodos , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Neoplasias Gástricas , Sangue , Classificação , Diagnóstico , Patologia
19.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery ; (12): 195-199, 2017.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-303889

RESUMO

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To assess the clinical value of the diagnostic laparoscopy in choosing treatment strategies for patients with gastric cancer.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Retrospective analysis was performed on clinical and pathological data collected from 2 023 patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery in the Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University from 2009 to 2014. All the patients were diagnosed as gastric cancer by endoscopic biopsy and staged by imaging examination before surgery. During the diagnostic laparoscopy procedure, a small periumbilical incision was made and a pneumoperitoneum with COunder 10-15 mmHg was established through a port. A 10 mm trocar was put in, and the camera was inserted. Two 5 mm trocars were put in two ports which located in midclavicular line two fingers under the left and right costal margin and then the instruments were inserted. A thorough inspection included ascites, the abdominal cavity, liver, diaphragm, spleen, greater omentum, colon, small intestine, mesentery, adnexa (female) and pelvic floor. If the tumor located at the posterior part of the stomach, the gastrocolic ligament was opened in order to look for carcinomatosis in the omental bursa. The accuracy rate of diagnostic laparoscopy in diagnosing adjacent organ invasion and intra-abdominal metastasis was calculated, and the rate of adjusting treatment plans after diagnostic laparoscopy was also calculated.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There were 52.7%(1 067/2 023) of patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy. The accuracy rate of diagnostic laparoscopy in evaluating adjacent organ invasion and intra-abdominal metastasis were 98.3%(1 049/1 067) and 98.1%(1 047/1 067) respectively. Besides, 14 patients with stage T4b and 32 with intra-abdominal metastasis, which were missed by imaging examination, were diagnosed by diagnostic laparoscopy. The treatment plans of 9.3% (99/1 067) of patients were changed after diagnostic laparoscopy, and 65 (6.1%) cases of non-therapeutic laparotomy were avoided. However, 18 cases of adjacent organ invasion and 20 cases of intra-abdominal metastasis were still missed by diagnostic laparoscopy, and 12 cases received non-therapeutic laparotomy.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Diagnostic laparoscopy has considerable value in assessing adjacent organ invasion and intra-abdominal metastasis and has great clinical significance in making precise treatment plans.</p>


Assuntos
Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Abdominais , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Sistema Digestório , Patologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Métodos , Laparoscópios , Laparoscopia , Métodos , Laparotomia , Invasividade Neoplásica , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Cirurgia Geral , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos , Procedimentos Desnecessários
20.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery ; (12): 847-851, 2017.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-317545

RESUMO

With the introduction and promotion of "precision medicine" conception, the history of disease occurrence, progression and prognosis has been deeply investigated with more accuracy, and the surgical treatment concept has become more precise and minimally invasive. With the rapid development of minimally invasive technique, laparoscopic gastrectomy has become an important part for treatment of gastric cancer. A number of randomized controlled clinical trials, such as KLASS-01 and CLASS-01, have demonstrated that laparoscopic gastrectomy is safe and feasible for treatment of early and locally advanced gastric cancer, respectively. Endoscopic treatment would also be considered with strict indications. The surgical safety is identical between standard laparoscopy surgery and open surgery for local advanced gastric cancer. Radical cure, organ function preservation and reduced surgical trauma are the basic rules for minimally invasive treatment for gastric cancer. Specialized treatment mode, which consists of precise evaluation of tumor location, gastrectomy and lymph node resection, reduced surgical trauma and control of postsurgical complications, is the premise for implementation of minimally invasive surgery. Accurate preoperative staging, strict indication of operation, accurate quality control and postoperative management are important warrants for the effect of minimally invasive treatment in patients with gastric cancer. With standard diagnosis and treatment procedures, the specialized treatment mode for gastric cancer combined with standard surgical resection is an important force to promote the development of minimally invasive surgery. And what should we do to train and promote gastric cancer treatment in primary medical care centers is an urgent problem. With the development of equipment, minimally invasive treatment will be more professional, more precise, safer and less invasive. In the era of precision medicine, with deeper exploring the pathogenesis of gastric cancer, promoting the development of specialized treatment mode and strengthened surgical team training could meet the demand for minimally invasive treatment of gastric cancer. Therefore, specialized minimally invasive treatment is the trend of minimally invasive treatment for gastric cancer in the new era.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA