RESUMO
ABSTRACT Objective: Binge eating disorder (BED) is the most prevalent eating disorder in individuals with obesity. Its association with factors that control hunger and satiety has not yet been elucidated. We evaluated whether levels of inflammatory markers, frequency of psychiatric comorbidities, and appetite-related hormones levels differ between individuals with obesity with and without BED. Materials and methods: The Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 - Clinician Version (SCID-5-CV), Binge Eating Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were evaluated in 39 individuals with obesity. Plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), leptin, ghrelin, and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) were measured. Results: Individuals of the BED group exhibited significantly higher percentages of altered eating patterns (hyperphagia, bingeing, post-dinner eating, feeling "stuffed", and emotional eating), higher depressive symptom scores and levels of leptin, CRP, and TNF-α, compared to those from the non-BED group. Logistic regression showed that BED was independently associated with depressive symptoms and CRP levels. Conclusions: Individuals with obesity and BED showed greater psychiatric comorbidity, worse eating patterns and worse inflammatory profile than those without BED. BED should be assessed as an indicator of clinical severity in patients with obesity.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare skinfold thickness (SKF) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) of body composition using three different equations against dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in overweight and obese Brazilian women. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: Thirty-four women (age 43.8 ± 10.9 years; body mass index [BMI] 32.1 ± 4.3 kg/m²) had percentage body fat (BF percent), fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) estimated by DXA, SKF and BIA (BIA-man: manufacturer's equation; and predictive obesity-specific equations of Segal and of Gray). Regression analysis, Bland-Altman plot analysis and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to compare methods. RESULTS: Absolute agreement between DXA and BIA-man was poor for all measures of body composition (BF percent -6.8 percent ± 3.7 percent, FM -3.1 ± 3.6 kg, FFM 5.7 ± 2.8 kg). BIA-Segal equation showed good absolute agreement with DXA for BF percent (1.5 percent ± 1.5 percent), FM (1.0 ± 3.2 kg) and FFM (1.5 ± 2.6 kg), albeit the limits of agreement were wide. BIA-Gray equation showed good absolute agreement with DXA for FM (2.3 ± 4.1 kg), and smaller biases for BF percent (0.05 percent ± 4.4 percent) and FFM (0.2 ± 2.9 kg), although wide limits of agreement. BIA-Gray and DXA showed the highest ICC among the pairs of methods. A good absolute agreement was observed between DXA and SKF for BF percent (-2.3 percent ± 5.8 percent), FM (0.09 ± 4.7 kg), and FFM (2.4 ± 4.4 kg), although limits of agreement were wider and ICC between DXA and SKF for BF percent indicated poor degree of reproducibility. CONCLUSION: These findings show that both BIA-Segal and BIA-Gray equations are suitable for BF percent, FM and FFM estimations in overweight and obese women.
OBJETIVO: Verificar a concordância dos métodos de impedância bioelétrica (BIA) usando três equações diferentes, e medida das pregas cutâneas (PC) com absorciometria de raios-X de dupla energia (DEXA), para análise da composição corporal de mulheres com sobrepeso e obesidade. SUJEITOS E MÉTODOS: Em 34 mulheres (43,8 ± 10.9 anos; índice de massa corporal [IMC] 32,1 ± 4,3 kg/m²) foram avaliados: percentual de gordura total ( por centoGT), massa gorda (MG) e massa magra (MM) por DEXA, PC, BIA-Fab (equação do fabricante), BIA-Segal e BIA-Gray (equações para obesidade). Foram utilizados: análise de regressão, método de Bland-Altman e coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI). RESULTADOS: A concordância absoluta entre DEXA e BIA-Fab foi fraca para todas as medidas (BF por cento -6,8 por cento ± 3,7 por cento, FM -3,1 ± 3,6 kg, FFM 5,7 ± 2,8 kg). BIA-Segal apresentou boa concordância absoluta com DEXA para por centoGT (1,5 por cento ± 1,5 por cento), MG (1,0 ± 3,2 kg) e MM (1,5 ± 2,6 kg), mas com amplos limites de concordância. BIA-Gray teve boa concordância absoluta com DEXA para MG (2,3 ± 4,1 kg) e pequenos vieses para por centoGT (0,05 por cento ± 4,4 por cento) e MM (0,2 ± 2,9 kg), mas com amplos limites de concordância. BIA-Gray e DEXA tiveram maior CCI entre métodos. Houve boa concordância absoluta entre DEXA e PC para por centoGT (-2,3 por cento ± 5,8 por cento), MG (0,09 ± 4,7 kg) e MM (2,4 ± 4,4 kg), mas com amplos limites de concordância e pouca reprodutibilidade no CCI, entre DEXA e PC para por centoGT. CONCLUSÃO: A BIA, utilizando equação específica para obesidade, foi o método que melhor concordou com DEXA, para estimar por centoGT, MG e MM em mulheres com sobrepeso e obesidade.