COVID-19 in the perioperative period of cardiovascular surgery: the brazilian experience

Abstract Introduction: We investigated the clinical course and outcomes of patients submitted to cardiovascular surgery in Brazil and who had developed symptoms/signs of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the perioperative period. Methods: A retrospective multicenter study including 104 patients who were allocated in three groups according to time of positive real time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for the SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2): group 1, patients who underwent cardiac surgery > 10 days after positive RT-PCR; group 2, patients with a positive RT-PCR within 10 days before or after surgery; group 3, patients who presented positive RT-PCR > 10 days after surgery. The primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcomes were postoperative complications, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and postoperative days of hospitalization. Results: The three groups were similar with respect to age, the European System of Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score, and comorbidities, except hypertension. Postoperative complications and death were significantly higher in groups 2 and 3 than in group 1, and no significant difference between groups 2 and 3 was seen. Group 2 showed a high prevalence of surgery performed as an urgent procedure. Although no significant differences were observed in ICU length of stay, total postoperative hospitalization time was significantly higher in group 3 than in groups 1 and 2. Conclusion: COVID-19 affecting the postoperative period of patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery is associated with a higher rate of morbidity and mortality. Delaying procedures in RT-PCR-positive patients may help reduce risks of perioperative complications and death.

Comparação entre Técnicas de Block-Matching e Optical Flow na análise do Strain pela Ecocardiografia / Comparison of Block-Matching and Optical Flow in Strain Echocardiography Analysis

Introdução: Diferentes tecnologias têm sido utilizadas para avaliar a função sistólica do ventrículo esquerdo. De particular interesse, está a ecocardiografia com strain bidimensional (2DSTE). Dois métodos diferentes têm sido usados para quantificar a deformação miocárdica (strain miocárdico) pela 2DSTE: block matching e optical flow. Ambos estão presentes em ecocardiógrafos comercialmente disponíveis. Entretanto, não há consenso a respeito se as medidas do strain longitudinal por estes métodos são sobreponíveis. Objetivo: Comparar os valores de pico do strain miocárdico longitudinal obtidos através da 2DSTE pelos dois diferentes métodos (block matching x optical flow). Método: Foram realizadas as medidas do strain em 16 segmentos miocárdicos do ventrículo esquerdo, conforme orientação da Sociedade Americana de Ecocardiografia pela técnica do block matching (Vivid 7, GE, Horten, Noruega) e, imediatamente após, pela técnica do optical flow (My Lab 60, Esaote, Florença, Itália) de forma randomizada e seus valores foram comparados. Resultados: Houve 28 indivíduos com idade 27,9 ± 7,7 anos, sendo 50% do sexo masculino e todos com fração de ejeção superior a 55%. A medida do strain longitudinal global foi maior pela técnica de block matching (p = 0,02). Na análise dos 16 segmentos, houve 10 segmentos com valores diferentes, em especial os segmentos apicais. Conclusão: Os valores do strain miocárdico longitudinal obtidos por métodos diferentes não são sobreponíveis e devem ser usados com cautela. Sendo assim, valores de normalidade também variam de acordo com o fabricante e o método utilizado

Introduction: Different technologies have been used to evaluate left ventricular systolic function. Of particular interest is the two-dimensional strain echocardiography (2DSTE). Two different methods have been used to quantify myocardial strain by 2DSTE: block matching and optical flow. Both are present in commercially available echocardiographs. However, there is no consensus as to whether the longitudinal strain measures using these methods are overlapping. Objective: To compare the longitudinal myocardial strain peak values obtained through 2DSTE using two different methods (block matching x optical flow). Method: Strain measurements in 16 left ventricular myocardial segments were taken as recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography using block matching (Vivid 7, GE, Horten, Norway) and, immediately after, using optical flow (My Lab 60, Esaote, Florence, Italy) in a randomized way and their values were compared. Results: There were 28 individuals aged 27.9 ± 7.7, of whom 50% were male and all with an ejection fraction greater than 55%. Global longitudinal strain was higher using block matching (p = 0.02). In the analysis of the 16 segments, 10 segments had different values, especially the apical segments. Conclusion: Longitudinal myocardial strain values obtained by different methods are not overlapping and must be used with caution. Normality values also vary according to the manufacturer and the method used