Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Singapore medical journal ; : 373-390, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-262390

RESUMO

We present the revised 2016 Singapore paediatric resuscitation guidelines. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation's Pediatric Taskforce Consensus Statements on Science and Treatment Recommendations, as well as the updated resuscitation guidelines from the American Heart Association and European Resuscitation Council released in October 2015, were debated and discussed by the workgroup. The final recommendations for the Singapore Paediatric Resuscitation Guidelines 2016 were derived after carefully reviewing the current available evidence in the literature and balancing it with local clinical practice.

2.
Singapore medical journal ; : 639-634, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-337842

RESUMO

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>Toy-related injuries, a common reason for emergency department visits in the paediatric population, constitute a significant health burden in Singapore. Although government regulations imposed on toys and childcare-related items are in place, parents and caregivers still play a pivotal role in ensuring toy safety in children. We hypothesised that deficiencies in knowledge surrounding toy safety issues exist in our adult population.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire study at KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, to examine the current attitudes, knowledge and practices of the local population regarding toy safety. Hypothetical questions on toy selection were included in the questionnaire to assess respondents' ability to identify appropriate toys and discern potentially dangerous toys for a specified age group.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The scores of the 93 respondents showed that they were less able to identify appropriate toys for children in the 1-2 years (66.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 61.4%-72.0%) and 2-3 years age groups (69.9%; 95% CI 65.5%-74.3%) than for children in the 0-1 year (82.8%; 95% CI 79.9%-85.7%) and 3-5 years age groups (85.2%; 95% CI 81.2%-89.2%). Our survey also identified key areas for improvement (e.g. educational efforts and government regulation) in current practices in order to attain a higher level of toy safety.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Our study highlights the current knowledge deficit in toy safety issues and the need for improvements in regulation, education and surveillance in order to minimise the risk of toy-related injuries in children.</p>


Assuntos
Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Fatores Etários , Proteção da Criança , Intervalos de Confiança , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Estudos Transversais , Incidência , Avaliação das Necessidades , Jogos e Brinquedos , Ferimentos e Lesões , Singapura , Inquéritos e Questionários , Ferimentos e Lesões
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA