Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Rev. bras. pesqui. méd. biol ; Braz. j. med. biol. res;50(4): e5997, 2017. graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-839277

RESUMO

Amebiasis is one of the twenty major causes of disease in Mexico; however, the diagnosis is difficult due to limitations of conventional microscopy-based techniques. In this study, we analyzed stool samples using polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) to differentiate between Entamoeba histolytica (pathogenic) and E. dispar (non-pathogenic). The target for the PCR amplification was a small region (228 bp) of the adh112 gene selected to increase the sensitivity of the test. The study involved 62 stool samples that were collected from individuals with complaints of gastrointestinal discomfort. Of the 62 samples, 10 (16.1%) were positive for E. histolytica while 52 (83.9%) were negative. No sample was positive for E. dispar. These results were validated by nested PCR-RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) and suggest that PCR-DGGE is a promising tool to differentiate among Entamoeba infections, contributing to determine the specific treatment for patients infected with E. histolytica, and therefore, avoiding unnecessary treatment of patients infected with the non-pathogenic E. dispar.


Assuntos
Humanos , Eletroforese em Gel de Gradiente Desnaturante/métodos , Entamoeba histolytica/genética , Entamoeba histolytica/isolamento & purificação , Entamoeba/genética , Entamoeba/isolamento & purificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , DNA de Protozoário/genética , Entamebíase/parasitologia , Polimorfismo de Fragmento de Restrição , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA