Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Indian J Pediatr ; 2007 Jun; 74(6): 545-9
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-82283

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the weighted incidence of hearing impairment in a standardized population of at risk and not at risk neonates seeking care at a tertiary level hospital in India. METHODS: A prospective study of a nonrandomized cohort of 1769 neonates (1490: Not at risk; 279: At risk) from a total of 8192 neonates (6509: Not at risk; 1683: At risk) who sought care at St John's medical College hospital from 1st September 2002 to 31st March 2006 were screened for hearing impairment using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Weighting was performed using the expected value of 10 % at risk and 90 % not at risk infants in a typical tertiary care level center in India derived from the National Neonatology and Perinatology database 2002-2003. Z test and 95 % confidence interval was used to determine the external validity of the results. P less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The power of the study is 90 %. RESULTS: The incidence of hearing impairment in infants screened was 10 per 1769 infants screened (1490: Not at risk; 279: At risk) which is 5.65 per 1000 screened. 279 at risk infants were screened and 3 were detected to have hearing impairment which is an incidence of approximately 10.75 per 1000 screened. Of the 1490 not at risk infants screened 7 had hearing impairment that is 4.70 per 1000 screened. If this was extrapolated to a standardized population consisting of 10 % at risk and 90 % not at risk then the incidence would be 5.60 per 1000 screened with a 95 % confidence interval of 4.13-7.06. This narrow 95 % confidence interval with a p equal to 0.001 indicates that this value may be close to the caseload in a typical tertiary care center. CONCLUSION: In this study the incidence of hearing impairment is 3 per 279 in at risk infants screened and 7 per 1490 in not at risk infants screened. The weighted incidence in a standardized population of neonates seeking care at tertiary level center in India is 5.60 per 1000 as per this study. This high incidence calls for all pediatricians to consider incorporating a basic hearing screen for all the neonates using cost effective and appropriate technology. Initial screening may be performed using behavioral observation techniques and confirmation by otoacoustic emissions.


Assuntos
Testes de Impedância Acústica , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalos de Confiança , Países em Desenvolvimento , Feminino , Seguimentos , Perda Auditiva/congênito , Testes Auditivos/métodos , Humanos , Incidência , Índia/epidemiologia , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Triagem Neonatal/organização & administração , Probabilidade , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Distribuição por Sexo
2.
J Indian Med Assoc ; 2004 Oct; 102(10): 589-90, 592
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-100233

RESUMO

Reviparin sodium (clivarine) is a second generation LMWH, developed with the aim of maximising the antithrombotic action while minimising the risk of haemorrhage. Clivarine has been extensively studied in acute coronary syndrome. Various clinical studies in unstable angina and acute coronary syndrome have proved that clivarine in a dosage of 3436anti-Xa units twice daily is an effective antithrombotic agent. Clivarine has been shown to be as effective as unfractionated heparin (UFH) in thromboprophylaxis and it has less incidence of local haematoma at injection site. At a daily dose of 1432 IU anti-Xa it was found to be as effective as UFH in preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in moderate risk surgery (general and abdominal) and reducing to a significant extent DVT in patients with brace immobilisation of the legs. At a daily dose of 3436 IU anti-Xa reviparin was as effective as UFH or enoxaparin in preventing DVT in high risk orthopaedic surgery and as effective as UFH in prevention of DVT and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) and/or mortality in high risk orthopaedic surgery. In patients with acute venous thrombo-embolism (VTE), reviparin was more effective than UFH in thrombus reduction and at least as effective as UFH in the prevention of clinical recurrence of DVT and/or PE. The use of reviparin is associated with a similar or lower incidence of bleeding complications than UFH. The benefits of reviparin sodium have been demonstrated in a number of clinical trials.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Doença das Coronárias/tratamento farmacológico , Reestenose Coronária/prevenção & controle , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Tromboembolia/prevenção & controle , Trombose Venosa/prevenção & controle
3.
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-63740

RESUMO

A 62-year-old man with recurrent inflammatory pseudotumor of the small bowel mesentery presented with perforative peritonitis; such a presentation has not been reported. The mass was excised successfully.


Assuntos
Granuloma de Células Plasmáticas/complicações , Humanos , Doenças do Íleo/complicações , Doenças do Jejuno/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peritonite/etiologia , Recidiva
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA