Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health ; 1993 Jun; 24(2): 216-20
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-31335

RESUMO

A randomized, double-blind field trial was carried out to compare the economic impact of permethrin-treated nets with that of untreated nets as a method of malaria control. The study was conducted in 261 long-term migrant workers and 138 seasonal agricultural migrant workers in the eastern rural areas known to be highly endemic for multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum infection. One hundred and twenty-six longterm migrants and 59 seasonal migrants used treated nets, while 135 and 79, respectively, used untreated nets. The impregnated-nets program was cost-saving as well as offering improved effectiveness. The net benefit of using a treated net was US$1.17 per worker from the Malaria Division's perspective and US$1.61 per worker from the worker viewpoint. The use of impregnated nets with large-scale primary health care programs likely will be the most cost-effective and cost-beneficial method for controlling malaria in eastern Thailand.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos e Análise de Custo , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Malária Falciparum/economia , Projetos Piloto , Prevenção Primária/economia , Tailândia , Migrantes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA