RESUMO
Objective:To analyze the effect of inter-spinal distraction fusion and fixation (ISDFF) combined with limited decompression on the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients.Methods:A total of 32 elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, aged from 80 to 87 years old (mean age: 82.0±2.0 years) including 10 males and 22 females, in the Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2016 to January 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Clinical evaluation and imaging measurement were performed before operation, after operation, 6 months and 24 months after operation. SPSS software was used for statistical analysis. Measured data of normal distribution were expressed as means±standard deviation. One way analysis of variance was used for comparison between groups. Paired t-test was used to compare between preoperative and postoperative as well as between preoperative and 24 months′ follow-up. Results:All of the 32 patients had one or more common accompanying diseases, such as hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, and so on. All patients were successfully completed the operation with a total of 32 segments. VAS score was decreased from (6.22±0.91) before operation to (1.94±0.76) at 24 months( t=16.52, P<0.001). ODI score was also demonstrated the similar trend, from (54.17±10.65) preoperatively to (19.91±4.20) at 24 months follow-up( t=15.89, P<0.001). JOA score was significantly increased from (11.69±3.36) before surgery to (23.44±1.66) at the last follow-up ( t=-19.90, P<0.001). In the change of imaging, the intervertebral angle was decreased from preoperation (9.12±4.65) to (6.77±2.70) at 24 months( t=3.53, P=0.001). The posterior disk height was increased from (0.68±0.19) cm to (0.76±0.19) cm at the last follow-up( t=-2.45, P=0.020). Conclusions:As a new type of minimally invasive internal fixator, the ISDFF combined with limited decompression can relieve the pain of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and improve the quality of life. It is suitable for the treatment of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
RESUMO
Objective:To analyze the clinical efficacy of inter-spinal distraction fusion and fixation and Posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation with stenosis, and to evaluate the health economics of the two surgical methods.Methods:Retrospectivly analyzed the clinical data of 400 patients with lumbar disc herniation with stenosis, who were enrolled in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University from Jan. 2015 to Jan. 2019, including 190 male cases and 210 female cases, aged from 50 to 87 years old, with the average age of 67.97. All patients were divided into two groups according to different surgical methods. Among them, 200 patients used interspinous process fusion and distraction fixation (ISDFF group), the other 200 cases used posterior lumbar decompression and pedicle internal fixation (PLIF group). All patients completed the follow-up time of more than 1 year after operation. The basic information of patients′ age, gender, total number of days in hospital, intraoperative bleeding, operation time, surgical incision length and other basic information were observed. The Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI), the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score (JOA) and the visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the relief of symptoms before and after the two groups of patients. Total medical expenses, anesthesia expenses, surgical expenses and other expenses were analysed. The software of SPSS 20.0 were conducted to analyze data.Results:The patients in the ISDFF group were (70.84±8.93) years old, and the PLIF group was (65.10±10.23) years old ( t=5.98, P=0.008). The operation time in the ISDFF group was (59.21±16.22) min, and the operation time in the PLIF group was (81.31±17.24) min( t=13.20, P<0.001). The bleeding volume of the ISDFF group was (33.24±11.31) mL, and the bleeding volume of the PLIF group was (67.30±17.61) mL ( t=23.02, P<0.001). The length of the surgical incision in the ISDFF group was (8.27±2.53) cm, and the length of the surgical incision in the PLIF group was (11.15±1.91) cm ( t=11.848, P<0.001). The total hospitalization time in the ISDFF group was (15.15±0.54) days, and the total hospitalization time in the PLIF group was (19.86±0.97) days( t=4.26, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in preoperative ODI, JOA and VAS between the two groups ( P>0.05). Symptoms of postoperative patients were significantly improved compared with preoperative. There were statistical differences in ODI, JOA and VAS between the two groups before and after operation ( P<0.05). However, ODI, JOA and VAS were no statistical difference between the two groups after operation. Complications occurred in 5 cases of the two groups of patients, including two cases of superficial infection in the PLIF group, two cases of dural tear in the PLIF group, one case of spinous process fracture in the ISDFF group. The total hospitalization fee for ISDFF was (57 450±8 670) (yuan), and the total hospitalization fee for PLIF was (75 770±1 640) (yuan), with statistical differences ( t=9.92, P<0.001). The cost of ISDFF operation was 1864±38.19 (yuan), and the cost of PLIF operation was 2352±41.39 (yuan) ( t=8.65, P<0.001). ISDFF antibacterial drug usage fee was 635.5±64.69 (yuan), PLIF antibacterial drug usage fee was 1449±307.1 (yuan) ( t=2.59, P<0.001). The one-time medical material cost during the ISDFF operation was (38 990±300) (yuan), and the one-time medical material cost during the PLIF operation was (52 110±150) (yuan) ( t=5.88, P<0.001). The excellent and good rate of ISDFF group was 92%, and that of PLIF group was 86%. In this study, the total cost of hospitalization was used as an indicator to measure the cost, and further cost-effectiveness evaluation was made. For every good patient, the cost of the ISDFF group was 62 450 yuan, and the cost of the PLIF group was 88, 100 yuan. Conclusions:ISDFF is beneficial to reduce the cost of medical insurance in China, which is in line with the direction of national reform to reduce medical expenditure. It is a surgical method worthy of wide promotion and has a good application prospect.
RESUMO
Objective:To study the efficacy and safety of bone-filling mesh container plasty in the treatment of posterior wall fracture of vertebra caused by spinal metastases.Methods:This study is a retrospective analysis of 65 patients with pathological fractures of the vertebra caused by vertebral metastases treated with bone-filling mesh container plasty from January 2015 to December 2019. There were 21 males and 44 females, 70.3±10.8 (46-90) (years). According to primary tumor, there were 25 cases of lung cancer, 14 cases of breast cancer, 11 cases of digestive system cancer, 13 cases of urinary system cancer, 1 case of lymphoma and 1 case of ovarian cancer. In the segment of vertebral metastases, there were 2 cases of T 2 vertebra, 1 case of T 5 vertebra, 1 case of T 6 vertebra, 2 cases of T 8 vertebra, 1 case of T 9 vertebra, 5 cases of T 10 vertebra, 4 cases of T 11 vertebra, 15 cases of T 12 vertebra, 12 cases of L 1 vertebra, 8 cases of L 2 vertebra, 8 cases of L 3 vertebra, 4 cases of L 4 vertebra, and 2 cases of L 5 vertebra. According to the CT images of the patient's vertebra before operation, the area of the damaged posterior wall of the vertebra is measured as s, and the area of the posterior wall of the intact vertebra is measured as S. The ratio of posterior wall damage is calculated as R= s/ S, and the value of R represents the degree of damage to the posterior wall of the vertebra. According to the size of the R value, the patients were divided into four groups, typeⅠ( R≤25%, 21 cases), typeⅡ(25%< R≤50%, 22 cases), typeⅢ (50%< R≤75%, 14 cases), typeⅣ( R>75%, 8 cases). The visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) and activity of daily living (ADL) before and 1 day after surgery, 1 month after surgery, and 3 months after surgery were analyzed and compared to evaluate the efficacy of bone-filling mesh container plasty. Pairwise comparisons were performed to verify whether there is a difference in efficacy, bone cement leakage and postoperative complications. Results:All 65 patients were followed up for 3-6 months, with an average of 3.8 months. The VAS scores before surgery, postoperative day 1, postoperative 1, 3 months were 7.32±0.99, 4.14±1.06, 4.11±0.97, and 4.34±1.11, respectively, with a statistically significant difference ( F=149.20, P<0.001). ODI of preoperative, postoperative day 1, postoperative 1, and 3 months were 69.45%±4.15%, 36.65%±3.72%, 36.84%± 3.38%, 37.78%±3.45%, respectively, with a statistically significant difference ( F=840.88, P<0.001). ADL score of preoperative, postoperative day 1, postoperative 1, and 3 months were 71.31±12.81, 79.85±9.14, 78.92±8.95, and 78.31±8.67, respectively, with a statistically significant difference ( F=149.20, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in VAS, ODI and ADL scores between types I and IV (all P>0.05), but with the increase of R value, the leakage rate of intraspinal bone cement would increase correspondingly. Eleven cases occurred bone cement leakage with the rate of 17%. The leakage rate of type I and II was 0, type III was 7.1% (1/14), and type IV was 37.5% (3/8). All patients did not have systemic complications such as allergies, shock, decreased oxygen saturation, etc., and there were no bleeding, infection, nerve root symptoms or cement insertion syndrome after surgery. Conclusion:Bone-filling mesh container plasty can significantly improve the pain symptoms of patients with spinal metastases and recovery functions. The degree of damage to the posterior vertebra has no effect on the efficacy of the surgery. As the degree of damage to the posterior wall of the vertebra increases, the risk of complications of bone cement leakage in the spinal canal will increase.
RESUMO
Objective To discusses the clinical significance of XRCC1 399 and TYMS 5'-translation section enhancement subsequence polymorphism in guidance the postoperative individual chemotherapy for patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer.Methods Retrospectively analyze the results of 150 cases from February 2010to June 2014.Statistical analysis with SPSS 21.0.Results Three of the most common gene type of XRCC1 399 is Arg/Arg(58.7％),Arg/Gln(36.7％) and Gln/Gln(4.6％),respectively.Three of the most common gene type of TYMS is 3R/3R (70.7％),2R/3R (25.3％) and 2R/2R (4.0％),respectively.Conclusion In resected non-small cell lung cancer,XRCC1 399 Arg/Arg genotype is the most common,followed by Arg/Gln type.At the sarne time,TYMS gene type 3R/3R accounted for more than 70％,especially higher percentage of in adenocarcinoma.Neither of these two gene polymorphism is recommended as marker to guide the postoperative individual chemotherapy.