RESUMO
ABSTRACT: Intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) is a form of renal replacement that is used in veterinary medicine for cases involving drug removal, electrolyte imbalance, acute kidney injury, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of the present study was to verify the efficacy of IHD in dogs with CKD staged at grade III and to evaluate the effect of IHD on quality of life. Twelve dogs with CKD at stage III met the inclusion criteria and were divided equally into two groups. The control group (n=6) received only clinical treatment and intravenous fluid therapy, and the hemodialysis group (n=6) received clinical and IHD treatments. Blood samples were collected before and after treatments in both groups. We evaluated complications and clinical parameters of IHD every 30 minutes. Hemodialysis decreased serum urea, creatinine, and phosphorus. Despite the evident removal of nitrogen compounds, dialysis treatment did not increase survival time in these patients. The results of this study do not support the early use of dialysis in dogs with chronic kidney disease stage III.
RESUMO: A Hemodiálise Intermitente (HDI) é uma modalidade de substituição renal, utilizada na veterinária nos casos de remoção de drogas, distúrbios hidroeletrolítico, lesão renal aguda e doença renal crônica (DRC). O objetivo do presente estudo foi estudar o efeito da hemodiálise intermitente em cães com DRC estadeados no grau III, visando avaliar a qualidade de vida. Foram selecionados 12 cães com DRC no estádio III pelos critérios de inclusão, após foram divididos em Grupo Controle (n=6), onde foi preconizado apenas tratamento clínico e fluidoterapia, e Grupo hemodiálise (n=6), que além do tratamento clínico, utilizou-se a hemodiálise intermitente. A colheita de sangue para avaliação laboratorial foi realizada antes e após a fluidoterapia de ambos os grupos. Foram avaliados as intercorrências e os parâmetros clínicos durante a HDI a cada 30 minutos. A instituição do tratamento dialítico promoveu uma eficaz diminuição das concentrações séricas de ureia, creatinina e fósforo de modo mais precoce. Apesar da evidente remoção dos compostos nitrogenados, o tratamento dialítico não aumentou a sobrevida destes pacientes, não justificando o emprego desta técnica de forma precoce em cães com doença renal crônica no estádio III.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the renal function in healthy dogs submitted to nonselective and preferential COX-2 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy. METHODS: Twenty four healthy dogs were distributed into four groups (G) (n=6): ketoprofenG - treated with ketoprofen; nimesulideG - treated with nimesulid; meloxicanG - treated with meloxican; and etodolacG - treated with etodolaco. All the dogs received the NSAIDs for 10 days by oral route. Physical examination and renal function (urinalysis, urinary sodium and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), serum urea, creatinine, potassium and sodium, and endogenous creatinine clearance) were evaluated before, after five and ten days (T0, T5 and T10) of the treatment in all groups. RESULTS: Changes were observed in urinalysis, with a significant increase in renal cells in the urine at T5 and T10 in nimesulideG. Significant reduction in urinary sodium in nimesulideG at T5 was observed. The clearance values were lower in ketoprofenG at T10. CONCLUSIONS: Meloxicam and etodolac were the drugs that have proven to be safer for short-term therapy in healthy dogs in relation to renal function. NSAIDs ketoprofen and nimesulide should be used judiciously in dogs with renal dysfunction, since there are promoted changes in renal function.