Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 32(1): 38-42, Jan.-Feb. 2017. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-843467

RESUMO

Abstract Objective: This study is designed to evaluate the advantages between peratrial device closure under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance and open heart surgery in atrial septal defect. Methods: From November 2011 to September 2014, 28 patients with atrial septal defect were treated. Fourteen patients received peratrial device closure under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance (TEE group) and 14 patients received cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB group). Clinical parameters during intraoperative and postoperative periods were examined. Results: All patients recovered after surgery without serious complications. Compared with that in CPB group, clinical observations in TEE group showed significant decreases in the operation time (193.6±35.5 vs. 77.4±22.7 min, P<0.05), periods in intensive care unit (31.6±23.3 vs. 17.5±8.1 hours, P<0.05), fluid volume after operation (502.5±439.3 vs. 32.5±7.3 ml, P<0.05), postoperative length of hospital stay (8.9±2.8 vs. 6.8±2.4 days, P<0.05) and total hospitalization cost (7205.9±1617.6 vs. 5882.3±441.2 $, P<0.05). Conclusion: The peratrial device closure of atrial septal defect under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance is a mini-invasive, simple, safe and effective intervention. Its use in the clinical practice should be encouraged.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Comunicação Interatrial/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Dispositivo para Oclusão Septal , Comunicação Interatrial/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
Pakistan Journal of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 1987; 3 (2): 40-44
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-9595

RESUMO

Laryngeal cancer was managed surgically in 55 patients from 1977 to 1981. Two different methods of Reconstructive Laryngectomy were used. All cases were followed from 3 to 7 years. Five year survival rate for supraglottic cancer was 78% and for Glottic cancer 77%. Post operative complication of aspirations into respiratory system on swallowing can be improved by improvement of surgical technique and proper selection of cases


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Laringe/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA