RESUMO
Objective:To investigate the effects of endotracheal intubation anesthesia versus laryngeal mask anesthesia on the incidence of pulmonary infection in young children undergoing surgery. Methods:A total of 100 young children who underwent surgery under general anesthesia in Hangzhou Children's Hospital from January 2020 to December 2020 were included in this study. They were randomly allocated into the endotracheal intubation anesthesia and laryngeal mask anesthesia groups ( n = 50/group). The symptoms of respiratory tract infection (nasal congestion, cough, sputum ringing, rale, and sputum excretion) and the incidence of pulmonary infection evaluated 24 hours after surgery were compared between the two groups. At the same time, the pathogens of infection and perioperative conditions as well as prognosis were also compared between the two groups. Results:The incidences of nasal obstruction, cough, sputum ringing, rale, sputum excretion, and pulmonary infection were 56.0% (28/50), 42.0% (21/50), 14.0% (7/50), rale 38.0% (19/50), 16.0% (8/50), and 38.00 (19/50) respectively in the endotracheal intubation anesthesia group, which were significantly higher than those in the laryngeal mask anesthesia group [28.0% (14/50), 14.0% (28/50), 4.0% (8/50), 24.0% (12/50) 4.0% (2/50), 6.0%(3/50), χ2 = 12.18, 21.47, all P < 0.001]. A total of 34 strains of pathogens were detected in the two groups, including 4 strains in the laryngeal mask anesthesia group and 30 strains in the endotracheal intubation anesthesia group. The 34 strains of pathogens included 7 strains of gram-positive bacteria (20.6%), 23 strains of gram-negative bacteria (67.6%), and 4 strains of fungi (11.8%). There was no significant difference in pathogen composition between the two groups ( χ2 = 1.04, P = 0.310). The time to recovery and the time to extubation in the laryngeal mask anesthesia group were (10.3 ± 3.1) minutes and (13.5 ± 2.4) minutes, which were significantly shorter than those in the endotracheal intubation anesthesia group [(16.1 ± 5.1) minutes, (19.5 ± 4.1) minutes, t = 3.17, 7.19, both P < 0.05]. There were no significant differences in the proportion of children who needed prolonged hospitalization and the proportion of children scheduled to undergo readmission between the two groups (both P > 0.05). Conclusion:Laryngeal mask anesthesia is simpler to operate, remarkably decreases the incidence of pulmonary infection, and is safer compared with endotracheal intubation anesthesia. Therefore, laryngeal mask anesthesia is preferred for general anesthesia for surgery in young children. The study is of great innovation and science.
RESUMO
Objective@#To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Handoff Clinical Examination Exercise (Handoff CEX).@*Methods@#The Chinese version of the Handoff CEX was composed of two parts, one to assess the nurse providing the handoff and another to assess the nurse receiving the handoff. A total of 80 handoffs was evaluated to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Handoff CEX.@*Results@#A total of 320 evaluations of handoff was obtained. The Cronbach α coefficient was 0.85 for the handoff provider, and that was 0.80 for the handoff recipient. Weighted kappa scores for provider evaluations ranged from 0.31-0.52, and that for recipient evaluations ranged from 0.35-0.55. The correlation coefficients between each factor ranged from 0.23 to 0.62, and that between each factor and the total scale ranged from 0.33 to 0.64 (P<0.05). Experienced nurses (>5 years) received significantly higher mean scores than inexperienced nurses(≤5 years) in all domains except organizational efficiency and professionalism(P<0.05).@*Conclusion@#The Chinese version of the Handoff CEX is a reliable and valid tool to assess the nursing handoff, which is useful for educators, supervisors and clinical nurses to provide training, ongoing assessment and feedback to improve the quality of handoff.
RESUMO
Objective:To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Handoff Clinical Examination Exercise (Handoff CEX).Methods:The Chinese version of the Handoff CEX was composed of two parts, one to assess the nurse providing the handoff and another to assess the nurse receiving the handoff. A total of 80 handoffs was evaluated to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Handoff CEX.Results:A total of 320 evaluations of handoff was obtained. The Cronbach α coefficient was 0.85 for the handoff provider, and that was 0.80 for the handoff recipient. Weighted kappa scores for provider evaluations ranged from 0.31-0.52, and that for recipient evaluations ranged from 0.35-0.55. The correlation coefficients between each factor ranged from 0.23 to 0.62, and that between each factor and the total scale ranged from 0.33 to 0.64 ( P<0.05). Experienced nurses (>5 years) received significantly higher mean scores than inexperienced nurses(≤5 years) in all domains except organizational efficiency and professionalism( P<0.05). Conclusion:The Chinese version of the Handoff CEX is a reliable and valid tool to assess the nursing handoff, which is useful for educators, supervisors and clinical nurses to provide training, ongoing assessment and feedback to improve the quality of handoff.
RESUMO
Objective@#To identify the impeding and promoting factors of role definition in nursing handoff, in order to increase the quality of nursing handoff.@*Methods@#Two nursing managers, 22 head nurses and four nurses were recruited by purpose sampling. Data were collected by using focus group study, and analyzed using content analysis.@*Results@#According to the framework of role transition theory, the factors could be classified as individual factors (37 items, 23.72%), organizational factors (105 items, 67.31%), effectiveness of role definition (11 items, 7.05%), and problems of role definition (3 items, 1.92%).@*Conclusions@#Role definition in nursing handoff helping the coming nurse check the performance of the last shift and transfer the nursing responsibility, contributes to the improvement of nursing quality, but there are still many factors affecting the role definition in nursing handoff.