Effect of a selective restriction policy on antibiotic expenditure and use: an institutional model.

Strictly enforced antibiotic formulary restriction in combination with formulation of agreed guidelines for antibiotic use in common infection problems such as septicemia, febrile neutropenia, urinary tract infection, biliary sepsis, liver abscess, peritonitis, nosocomial pneumonia, soft tissue infection and purulent meningitis, generated a combined savings of 307,748.5 bahts or 13.5 per cent cost reduction over a 6 month period, and improved quality of use, appropriate 54.8 vs 67.5 per cent, statistically significance (P less than 0.002). Although this saving was offset in part by increased spending of unrestricted antibiotics, such as Penicillin and Gentamicin, an overall cost saving remained. In the months during the restrictions, no significant changes occurred regarding patients response and mortality. However, after the onset of the controls, it was revealed that antibiotics were more appropriately used afterwards. This study has shown, most importantly, that savings were achieved with no negative effect on good patient care. Moreover, the antibiotic use control was operationally successful, most house-staff and attending physicians, not only antibiotic evaluating team, have accepted the program in a very positive way. Overall, this program successfully achieved its initial goal, cost saving without compromising good medical practice. We are now continuing our program and also trying to modify so that it will be useful to all departments in the hospital.

Detection of Plasmodia in acridine orange stained capillary tubes (the QBC system).

The sensitivity, specificity and convenience of carrying out malaria diagnosis in acridine orange stained capillary tubes using a fluorescent microscope (the QBC system) was compared to screening for Plasmodia on conventional Giemsa stained thick smears. A dilution study revealed that the QBC is able to detect Plasmodia in as low a dilution as 5 organisms per ul. The QBC system was evaluated at a district hospital in Thailand. A preliminary study of 186 patients compared the QBC system to the routine malaria screening procedure (screening up to 30 microscopic fields on a thick smear). The sensitivity of the QBC was found to be 98.9% with a specificity of 94.4%. A second combined series of 465 febrile subjects were screened by thick smear and these results were compared to the QBC. 202 were positive for malaria on both QBC and thick smear. Sensitivity in this study was found to be 99.5% (202/203) and the specificity was 94.6% (248/262). When both series were combined, there were 14 QBC malaria positives that were not detected on thick smear, and 2 QBC malaria false negatives among the 651 patients studied. The parasite densities in these cases were between 10 and 320,000 organisms/microliters. The QBC system provided only a crude estimate of the level of parasitemia. The species of Plasmodia (P. falciparum and P. vivax) were correctly identified on QBC in 78% of cases.