RESUMO
Objective To discuss the reasons of false judgments of localization of the rupture aneurysms and find the way to fix this problem in patients with multiple intracranial aneurysms. Methods The clinical data of 25 consecutive patients, who presented with their first spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage and had multiple intracranial aneurysms from 2003 to 2009 in our hospital, were analyzed retrospectively. The rupture aneurysms were determined according to Nehls' method that reported before, and the supposed responsible rupture aneurysms w0ere clipped within 48 hours after hemorrhage in all patients. More aneurysms that could not be accessed in the same surgical session were surgically terated later. Results The location of the rupture aneurysm was verified at the time of surgery in all 25 patients. The concordance rate of the prediction and the reality of the rupture aneurysm was 80% (20/25). Four patients ( 16% ) ,in whom the ruptured aneurysm was not correctly identified,rebled after surgery,and 2 patients died as a result of the rebleeding One patients had no clear diagnosis at the end. Conclusion In the reported cases, about 80% rupture aneurysms could be correctly diagnosed before treatment according to the CT and DSA examinations. If clear diagnosis couldn't be made,additional examinations should be considered, such as CTA or MRI. Rupture aneurysms must be confirmed during the operation and the other aneurysms should be checked to exclude additional responsible aneurysms in all cases.