Usefulness of Additional LISS/Coombs Card Test with Enzyme-Treated Red Cells in Detecting Anti-Kidd Antibodies Not Detectable by NaCl/Enzyme Card Test Alone / 대한수혈학회지

BACKGROUND: Detection of anti-Kidd antibody is important because of its clinical significance. If detection is difficult due to weak serological reactivity or dosage effect, use of an enzyme method could be helpful. However, despite use of an enzyme method, we still observed weak reactivity of anti-Kidd antibody. METHODS: All identified anti-Kidd antibody cases from Jan 2012 to Aug 2015 in Asan Medical Center were reviewed. Antibody identification test was performed using the column agglutination technique using Bio-Rad ID-DiaPanel with LISS/Coombs card, Bio-Rad ID-DiaPanel-P with NaCl/Enzyme card, and ID-DiaPanel-P with LISS/Coombs card. The test results were compared. RESULTS: Sixty cases of anti-JK(a) or anti-Jk(b) were detected and tested by enzyme method. Among them, 34 (56.6%) cases showed strengthened reactivity using the ID-DiaPanel-P with NaCl/Enzyme card method. However, 26 (43.4%) cases showed weakened reactivity. Of these, 13 cases that could be tested by an additional method using ID-DiaPanel-P with LISS/Coombs card containing anti-IgG and anti-C3d showed successfully strengthened reactivity. CONCLUSION: The reactivity of anti-Kidd antibodies that was not strengthened using ID-DiaPanel-P with NaCl/Enzyme card method could be successfully strengthened by use of the ID-DiaPanel-P with LISS/Coombs card.

The First Case of Anti-f(ce) and Anti-Csa Antibodies in Korea / 대한수혈학회지

Anti-f(ce) has been associated with hemolytic transfusion reaction (HTR) and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN), however, anti-Cs(a) has not been associated with red blood cell (RBC) destruction. Although anti-Cs(a) has clinical insignificance as a high-titer low-avidity (HTLA) antibody, this antibody can cause confusion in interpreting an antibody identification test, particularly coexistence of a clinically significant antibody. A 65-year-old woman with liver metastases of Klatskin tumors and cholangitis was admitted to the hospital for abdominal pain. She developed hematochezia on hospital day 10. She was at the status of active bleeding and required transfusion. The result of antibody identification test was warm-reactive autoantibody and unidentifiable alloantibody, therefore, the least incompatible packed RBCs had to be transfused to the patient. No hemolytic transfusion reaction occurred and hemoglobin level was normalized. Thereafter, anti-f(ce) and anti-Cs(a) antibodies were identified in the patient's serum. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of anti-f and anti-Cs(a) antibodies in Korea.

Isolation of Anti-D after Administration of Intravenous Immune Globulin in a Patient with Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura / 대한수혈학회지

Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) is widely used in treatment of hypogammablobulinemia and for immunomodulation. Passive transfer of anti-D activity through administration of IVIG may cause difficulty in serologic assessment of patients. Here we report on a case of passive anti-D from IVIG in a D positive patient. The patient was a 72-year-old Korean woman who was hospitalized for refractory immune thrombocytopenic purpura that is not cured after steroid therapy. IVIG 6,000 mg was administered for treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura. After IVIG administration for two days, we identified anti-D in the patient and a positive direct antiglobulin test was demonstrated. The patient's hemoglobin level remained unchanged. After IVIG administration for 10 days, the patient's specimen was negative for anti-D, as would be expected with passively acquired antibody. Antibodies in IVIG may confuse and complicate serologic testing of transfusion candidates. Therefore, passive transfer of anti-D should be considered when anti-D is detected, especially when the patient has received IVIG, as in this case.

Annual Report on External Quality Assessment in Blood Bank Tests in Korea (2008) / 임상검사와정도관리

We report here the results of surveys for external quality assessment of blood bank tests performed in 2008. Survey specimens were sent three times to 460, 470 and 473 participant institutes, and the response rates for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd trial were 97.6%, 97.7%, and 97.7%, respectively. Test items for the surveys were ABO grouping, Rh (D) typing, crossmatching, direct antiglobulin test, antibody screening and antibody identification test. The average accuracy rates of ABO grouping and Rh typing were 100% and 98.3-100%, respectively. In crossmatching test, the accuracy rates were 97.5-99.7% for the compatible samples, 92.4-99.2% for the incompatible samples, and 88.2-98.9% for the samples which could be detected as incompatible only by antiglobulin method. The accuracy rates of direct antiglobulin test were 98.4-99.7% for negative samples and 93.4-99.7% for positive samples. The correct results were reported by 99.6-100% of the surveyed institutions for antibody screening test and 98.2-100% for antibody identification test. Twenty-three institutions gave repeatedly incorrect answers for crossmatching test. Ten institutions out of them gave incorrect answers for all the test specimens sent out 3 times last year.