IdentificationofCTtargetreconstructioninpersistentinvasivepureground-glassnodules / 实用放射学杂志

Objective ToexplorethevalueofCTtargetreconstructionforpureground-glassnodules(pGGN)onidentifyingthe invasivenessofthelungadenocarcinoma.Methods ThepGGNs weredividedintopre-invasivegroup[atypicaladenomatoushyperplasia (AAH),andadenocarcinomainsitu(AIS)]andinvasivegroup[minimallyinvasiveadenocarcinoma(MIA),andinvasiveadenocarcinomas(IA)] accordingtothepathologicresults.ThemorphologicfeaturesofpGGNonCTincludedthelargestdiameters,CTvalue,pleuralindentation,air bronchogram,bubblelucency,vesselconvergence,vesseldilatation,lobulationandspeculation.Twodiagnosticiansevaluatedthemorphologic featuresofpGGNonCT.Binary L o g istic regressionwasusedtoassesstheassociationbetweenCTfindingsandhistopathological classification.ROCcurveanalysiswasusedindiameterandCTvalue.Results Betweenpre-invasiveandinvasivegroup,therewere significantdifferencesindiameter,CTvalue,spiculationandvesseldilatation(P<0.05).Nodifferencewasfoundinlobulated-margin,bubble lucency,airbronchogram,vascularconvergenceorpleuralindentationbetweenthetwogroups(P>0.05).Thediagnosticthresholds forpredictingpGGOinfiltrationwere8.75mminmaximumdiameterand-605HUinCTvaluerespectively.Conclusion ThepGGNwitha diametermorethan87.5mm,theCTvaluemorethan-605HU,andpresencesofspiculationandvesseldilatationsuggeststhatpGGOisinvasive.

Diagnosis and treatment for intrathoracic gastroesophageal anastomotic leak: investigation of a new mode / 中华外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the feasibility of a new mode to diagnose and treat intrathoracic gastroesophageal anastomotic leak.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From January 2007 to December 2014, fifty-five patients were confirmed intrathoracic gastroesophageal anastomotic leak among those were performed surgical operation due to esophageal or cardiac carcinoma in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. To retrospectively analyze the clinical data of these patients, thirty-six male and nineteen female were included with the ages from 49 to 81 years (average age of (67±6)years). Among them, forty-two were middle esophageal carcinoma, eleven were lower esophageal carcinoma and two were cardiac carcinoma. According to the differences of diagnosis and treatment methods for anastomotic leak, fifty-five patients were divided into two groups. Thirty-one patients distributed from January 2007 to November 2011 were received conventional management (conventional group): to definitively diagnose by contrast swallow when suspected to be developing anastomotic leaks, to place an esophageal stent when the drainage was sufficient and the infection was controlled. Twenty-four patients distributed from March 2011 to December 2014 were received new-mode management (new-mode group): to perform a anastomotic radioscopy under digital subtraction angiography -guidance instantly when suspected anastomotic leak and find out the fistula, search the shape and size, place a drainage tube into the fistula to drain or lavage the vomica according to the exploration results, pull back the tube gradually and close the leak by clips under endoscope later. The pathoclinical features, the confirmation time (time from clinical signs emergence to leak confirmation), the hospital duration after confirmation, the incidence of severe complications and total mortality were compared between the two groups by t-test and χ(2) test or Fisher's exact test.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There was no significant statistical differences in pathoclinical features between two groups (P>0.05). The confirmation time was significantly reduced in new-mode group than that in conventional group ((1.2±0.8) d vs. (3.6±2.2) d, t=5.212, P=0.000), and so was the hospital duration after confirmation ((26±12) d vs. (55±25) d, t=4.992, P=0.000) and the incidence of severe complications (16.7% vs. 48.4%, χ(2)=6.019, P=0.014), although there was no statistical differences in total mortality (4.2% vs. 22.6%, P=0.119).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The new mode of early interventional diagnosis, early fistula drainage through nose and clipping under endoscope later is able to shorten diagnosis and treatment period, reduce incidence of severe complications.</p>

A prospective randomized control study about indication of chest tube removal following a VATS lobectomy / 中华胸心血管外科杂志

Objective This study assesses a feasible and safe volume threshold for chest tube removal following a VATS lobectomy.Methods The study included 168 consecutive patients who underwent VATS lobectomy or bilobectomy with two insicion between August 2012 and February 2014.Eligible patients were randomized into 3 groups:Group A (chest tube removal at the drainage volume of 150 ml/d or less.n =49) ; Group B (chest tube was removed when the drainage volume was less than 300 ml/d.n =50) ; Group C(chest tube removal when the drainage was less than 450 ml/d.n =51).And there were 18 patients who were excluded.All patients got the same postoperative care with a clinical pathway,and all patients were followedup 7 days after discharge from hospital.The time of extracting drainage tube,postoperative hospital stay,postoperative VAS values,dosage of analgesic,incidence of complications and thoracocentesis were measured.Results There were no statistically significant differences among 3 groups with general information and incidence of complication (P ＞ 0.05).And there were statistically significant differences between Group A and Group B with the time of extracting drainage tube,postoperative hospital stay,postoperative VAS values,dosage of analgesic(P ＜ 0.05).But there were no statistically significant differences between Group A and Group B with incidence of thoracocentesis(P ＞0.05).Analysis of data showed no statistically significant differences between Group B and Group C with postoperative hospital stay,postoperative VAS values and dosage of analgesic (P ＞ 0.05),but there were statistically significant differences for incidence of thoracocentesis (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion A 300 ml/d volume threshold for chest tube removoal after VATS lobectomy is feasible and safe,and it can bring more advantages than the 150 ml/d volume threshold.On the other hand,a 450 ml/d volume threshold for chest tube removoal after VATS lobectomy may increase the risk of thoracocentesis.