Visceral Leishmaniasis Elimination Program in Bangladesh and Achieving Millennium Development Goal.

Aims: The aim of this review is to present the status of Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) in Bangladesh and various steps taken to achieve the Millennium Development Goal (MDG). Additionally, the review covers the related challenges and opportunities to achieve this goal. Main Body: Currently, 45 out of 64 districts of the country are endemic for VL and 20 million people, around 18% of the total population, are considered to be at risk for VL. However, there is a concern about the total number of VL reported cases. It has been mentioned that the number of cases reported in surveillance data is likely to be at least five times underestimated. The current burden of VL disease is 23.4 times higher compare to the MDG of 1 case per 10,000 populations by 2015. In order to achieve the MDG various national strategies have been taken so far to eliminate VL from Bangladesh. Government of Bangladesh constituted a national steering committee and formed a technical working group to provide support to VL elimination program. Lack of trained and efficient labour force, along with lack of knowledge among the people are big challenges for VL elimination in Bangladesh. In addition, drug unavailability, unfriendly behaviour of health worker and existence of unofficial payment to the heath provider in public hospital work as barriers to achieve MDG. A major challenge towards VL elimination is the rising incidence of Post kalaazar dermal Leishmaniasis. Recent introduction of oral therapy with miltefosine and rapid diagnostic with rk39 as cost effective case management have the potentiality to work against all the barriers. Conclusion: From the public health view and guided by research evidence it seems the elimination of VL from Bangladesh is technically feasible and operationally possible. Ensuring sufficient health worker with adequate training remains the major challenges. Strengthening referral services, adapting active case detection strategies, and creating public awareness are also important for achieving MDG.

Costs of Maternal Health-related Complications in Bangladesh.

This paper assesses both out-of-pocket payments for healthcare and losses of productivity over six months postpartum among women who gave birth in Matlab, Bangladesh. The hypothesis of the study objective is that obstetric morbidity leads women to seek care at which time out-of-pocket expenditure is incurred. Second, a woman may also take time out from employment or from doing her household chores. This loss of resources places a financial burden on the household that may lead to reduced consumption of usual but less important goods and use of other services depending on the extent to which a household copes up by using savings, taking loans, and selling assets. Women were divided into three groups based on their morbidity patterns: (a) women with a severe obstetric complication (n=92); (b) women with a less-severe obstetric complication (n=127); and (c) women with a normal delivery (n=483). Data were collected from households of these women at two time-points—at six weeks and six months after delivery. The results showed that maternal morbidity led to a considerable loss of resources up to six weeks postpartum, with the greatest financial burden of cost of healthcare among the poorest households. However, families coped up with loss of resources by taking loans and selling assets, and by the end of six months postpartum, the households had paid back more than 40% of the loans.

Household costs of healthcare during pregnancy, delivery, and the postpartum period: a case study from Matlab, Bangladesh.

A household survey was undertaken in Matlab, a rural area of Bangladesh, to estimate the costs incurred during pregnancy, delivery, and the postpartum period for women delivering at home and in a health facility. Those interviewed included 121 women who delivered at home, 120 who delivered in an ICDDR,B basic obstetric care (BEOC) facility, 27 who delivered in a public comprehensive obstetric care (CEOC) hospital, and 58 who delivered in private hospitals. There was no significant difference in total costs incurred by those delivering at home and those delivering in a BEOC facility. Costs for those delivering in CEOC facilities were over nine times greater than for those delivering in BEOC facilities. Costs of care during delivery were predominant. Antenatal and postnatal care added between 7% and 30% to the total cost. Services were more equitable at home and in a BEOC facility compared to services provided at CEOC facilities. The study highlights the regressive nature of the financing of CEOC services and the need for a financing strategy that covers both the costs of referral and BEOC care for those in need.