RESUMO
Objective To explore the effect of Teach-back health education model on health education for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods Eighty patients after PCI operation in cardiology were selected, 40 patients selected from February to March as control group and 40 patients selected from April to May as observation group according to the time of admission in 2018. The control group used the routine health education method, based on this, the observation group used the"Teach-back"health education model to healthy educate patients. Three months after the intervention, the results of body mass index (BMI), triglycerides, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ), and Morisky questionnaire were evaluated. Results After 3 months of intervention, the triglyceride, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein in the observation group were (1.35±0.43), (3.99±0.57), and (2.32±0.24) mmol/L, which were lower than the control group (1.63±0.38), (4.31 ± 0.73), (2.61 ± 0.28) mmol/L, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (t=3.082, 2.717, 5.048, P<0.01 or 0.05). After 3 months of intervention, evaluate the SAQ score of the observation group, the degree of physical limitation, the stability of angina pectoris, the degree of angina pectoris, the satisfaction of treatment, and the disease cognition were respectively (76.16±5.03), (88.75± 14.92), and (84.25±12.17), (84.76±5.11), (82.79±9.64) points, which were higher than the control group (68.94 ± 9.80), (80.63 ± 17.44), (76.25 ± 12.34), (70.80 ± 7.00), (70.50 ± 13.85) points, the differences were statistically significant (t=-4.145, Z=-5.848--2.166, P < 0.05). After 3 months of intervention, the Morisky questionnaires of the observation group and the control group were (2.43±0.78) and (3.80±0.41) points, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-6.848, P<0.05). Conclusion The application of Teach-back health education model to patients after PCI has a good effect.
RESUMO
Objective@#To explore the effect of Teach-back health education model on health education for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).@*Methods@#Eighty patients after PCI operation in cardiology were selected, 40 patients selected from February to March as control group and 40 patients selected from April to May as observation group according to the time of admission in 2018. The control group used the routine health education method, based on this, the observation group used the "Teach-back" health education model to healthy educate patients. Three months after the intervention, the results of body mass index (BMI), triglycerides, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ), and Morisky questionnaire were evaluated.@*Results@#After 3 months of intervention, the triglyceride, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein in the observation group were (1.35±0.43), (3.99±0.57), and (2.32±0.24) mmol/L, which were lower than the control group (1.63±0.38), (4.31±0.73), (2.61±0.28) mmol/L, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (t=3.082, 2.717, 5.048, P<0.01 or 0.05). After 3 months of intervention, evaluate the SAQ score of the observation group, the degree of physical limitation, the stability of angina pectoris, the degree of angina pectoris, the satisfaction of treatment, and the disease cognition were respectively (76.16±5.03), (88.75±14.92), and (84.25±12.17), (84.76±5.11), (82.79±9.64) points, which were higher than the control group (68.94±9.80), (80.63±17.44), (76.25±12.34), (70.80±7.00), (70.50±13.85) points, the differences were statistically significant (t=-4.145, Z=-5.848--2.166, P < 0.05). After 3 months of intervention, the Morisky questionnaires of the observation group and the control group were (2.43±0.78) and (3.80±0.41) points, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-6.848, P<0.05).@*Conclusion@#The application of Teach-back health education model to patients after PCI has a good effect.
RESUMO
Objective To evaluate the value of 2012 classification criteria for early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA),2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria,and 1987 ACR classification criteria in the diagnosis of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods Patients who had at least one swollen and tender joint with disease duration no more than 2 years,and age more than 16 years were enrolled.The patients were diagnosed as RA or other non-RA by 2 experienced rheumatologists.The clinical and laboratory parameters were recorded.The sensitivity and specificity of three RA classification criteria were compared by McNemar test,The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) curve (AUC) of each RA classification criteria were analyzed using MedCalc software.Results Atotal of 310 patients were enrolled in this study,including 182ERA and 128 non-RA.The sensitivity(88.5％) of ERA criteria was much higher than that of the 1987 ACR criteria (45.6％,x2=75.013,P＜0.05),and not significantly different with the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria (91.8％,X2=1.042,P＞0.05).The specificity of ERA criteria (91.4％) of 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria (87.5％,x2=1.8,P＞0.05) was similar to that of the 1987 ACR criteria (96.1％,x2=3.1,P＞0.05).The AUC of ERA criteria was 0.962 [95％CI(0.934,0.980)],which was slightly better than that of the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria 0.959 [95％CI(0.931,0.978)],Z=0.380,P=0.7038,and much higher than that of the 1987 ACR criteria 0.885 [95％CI (0.845,0.919)],Z=4.517,P＜0.01.Conclusion Overall evaluation,the diagnostic value of ERA criteria is better than 1987 ACR and 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria in early rheumatoid arthritis.Compared to 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria,ERA criteria is more simple and practical.