Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Cancer Research and Clinic ; (6): 96-99, 2013.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-431490

RESUMO

Objective To introduce a new way to solve the problem of field-field junction in the traditional radiotherapy of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma better.Methods Using the 3-dimentional planning system,the dose distribution of traditional radiotherapy and the electronic beam irradiation technology of L shape field for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in 2D-or 3D-CRT could be gotten.Results The dose coverage of V95 of the gross tumor volume(GTV)satisfied the clinical requirements.The highest dose in the electronic beam irradiation of L shape field was 7200 cGy,while it was 8900 cGy in the traditional way.The volume of dose that over 6500 cGy of throat was 19.64 % in the former,the latter was 31.95 %.Conclusion The electronic beam irradiation technology of L shape field is better than the traditional radiotherapy in field-field junction and in dose distribution.Since that,the electronic beam irradiation technology of L shape field is worth of application for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

2.
Chinese Journal of Medical Physics ; (6): 1474-1476,1507, 2009.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-605016

RESUMO

Purpose: Simulating calculation the dose distribution of the total body irradiation (TBI) with three dimension treatment planning system(3D-TPS ). Materials and Methods: For TBI, the source skin distance(SSD) is 380 cm, field size is 40 cm × 40cm, and collimator angle is 45°. The percent dose depth (PDD) and onset axis ratio (OAR) of the linac accelerator is measured with the big water phantom self-made. In the same radiation condition, the PDD and OAR of water which is simulated calculation with the 3D-TPS is compared with the measurement results to confirm whether the 3D-TPS can calculate the TBI dose distribution. The dose distribution of the human phantom is calculated with 3D-TPS, which is compared and confirmed with the film and TLD measurements. Results: The maximum error of PDD and OAR in the water phantom between the measurements and calculations of 3D-TPS are 3% and 6%. The calculation results of the 3D-TPS is according with the measurement results of the film and TLD approximately. Conclusions: 3D-TPS could simulate calculation the dose distribution for TBI accurately. It is possible to improve more uniform dose for TBI with corresponding compensator for specific patient.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA