RESUMO
Background: Vein graft thrombosis is the leading cause of acute graft failure within the first post-operative month. Several studies have shown the benefit of post-operative dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) in preventing acute graft thrombosis. The purpose of this study was to determine whether peri-operative initiation of DAPT will improve short and intermediate term graft patency. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of 20 patients undergoing CABG to compare DAPT versus aspirin monotherapy. The primary outcome was post-operative graft patency at 2 and 52 weeks determined by <50% bypass graft stenosis by cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA). The secondary outcomes were (1) major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as myocardial infarction, thrombotic events, and angina, and (2) safety end-points defined as TIMI major and minor bleeding events. Results: The study population consisted predominately of men (19/20 patients). At 2 weeks, all LIMA grafts were patent although vein graft patency for the DAPT group was only 83.3% (20/24) compared to 89.5% (17/19) for placebo (p=0.597). At 52 weeks, the patency rate in the placebo group was 52.6% (10/19) as compared to a patency of 71.4% (15/24) in the dual anti-platelet therapy arm (p=0.244). Conclusion: The addition of clopidogrel to aspirin post-bypass surgery did not significantly improve venous graft patency at 2 weeks but trended toward higher graft patency at 52 weeks.
RESUMO
Introduction: Although diuretics are mainly used for the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), inadequate responses and complications have led to the use of extracorporeal ultrafiltration (UF) as an alternative strategy for reducing volume overloads in patients with ADHF. Objective: The aim of our study is to perform meta-analysis of the results obtained from studies on extracorporeal venous ultrafiltration and compare them with those of standard diuretic treatment for overload volume reduction in acute decompensated heart failure. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were systematically searched using a pre‑specified criterion. Pooled estimates of outcomes after 48 h (weight change, serum creatinine level, and all-cause mortality) were computed using random effect models. Pooled weighted mean differences were calculated for weight loss and change in creatinine level, whereas a pooled risk ratio was used for the analysis of binary all-cause mortality outcome. Results: A total of nine studies, involving 613 patients, met the eligibility criteria. The mean weight loss in patients who underwent UF therapy was 1.78 kg [95% Confidence Interval (CI): −2.65 to −0.91 kg; p < 0.001) more than those who received standard diuretic therapy. The post-intervention creatinine level, however, was not significantly different (mean change = −0.25 mg/dL; 95% CI: −0.56 to 0.06 mg/dL; p = 0.112). The risk of all-cause mortality persisted in patients treated with UF compared with patients treated with standard diuretics (Pooled RR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.64–1.56; p = 0.993). Conclusion: Compared with standard diuretic therapy, UF treatment for overload volume reduction in individuals suffering from ADHF, resulted in significant reduction of body weight within 48 h. However, no significant decrease of serum creatinine level or reduction of all-cause mortality ...
Introdução: Embora os diuréticos sejam utilizados como o principal tratamento na insuficiência cardíaca aguda descompensada, sua significativa taxa de complicações e respostas inadequadas levou ao uso de ultrafiltração extracorpórea como uma alternativa. Objetivo: Realizar uma meta-análise de estudos de ultrafiltração venosa extracorpórea e diuréticos no tratamento de sobrecarga hídrica na insuficiência cardíaca aguda descompensada. Métodos: MEDLINE, EMBASE e o banco de dados do Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials foram pesquisados sistematicamente usando um critério pré-estabelecido. Estimativas combinadas para os resultados na alteração de peso em 48 horas, creatinina sérica e mortalidade por todas as causas foram calculados utilizando modelos de efeitos aleatórios. As diferenças entre as médias ponderadas combinadas foram calculadas para a perda de peso e alteração nos níveis de creatinina e relação risco partilhado foi utilizada para o resultado binário de todas as causas de mortalidade. Resultados: Nove estudos foram considerados elegíveis para a análise, com inclusão de 613 pacientes. Pacientes submetidos a ultrafiltração perderam em média 1,78kg (intervalo de confiança [IC] 95% -2,65 a 0,91kg, p < 0,001) quando comparados com pacientes submetidos à terapia diurética padrão. Os níveis de creatinina pós-intervenção, no entanto, não diferiram entre os grupos (diferença média de -0,25 mg/dL CI 95% -0,56 a 0,06mg/dL p = 0,112). Não observamos evidências de redução de risco de mortalidade por todas as causas em pacientes submetidos à UF quando comparados àqueles tratados com terapia diurética padrão (RR combinado = 1,00 CI 95% 0,64 1,56, p = 0,993). Conclusão: Quando comparado à terapia diurética padrão, o uso de UF no tratamento de sobrecarga hídrica em ICAD resultou em uma redução significativa de peso em 48 horas. No entanto, não foi observada melhoria significativa na redução dos níveis de creatinina ou na taxa de ...
Assuntos
Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pé Diabético/etiologia , Neuropatias Diabéticas/fisiopatologia , Pé/fisiopatologia , Pressão , Caminhada/fisiologia , Análise de Variância , Distinções e Prêmios , Biofísica , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Antepé Humano/fisiopatologia , Sociedades CientíficasRESUMO
Background: The use of noninvasive medical imaging has increased over the past decade at a cost of significant lifetime radiation exposure to study subjects. We report the implementation of radiation dose reduction methods and associated reduction in ionizing radiation exposure with Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) over time. Methods: Radiation doses and total number of studies performed were evaluated constantly from January 2010 to September 2012 for CCTA (N=2613), as well as Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT, N=8060) part of an ongoing effort to minimize radiation exposure. Analysis of variance was used to evaluate the radiation exposure reduction among modalities. We compared CCTA radiation doses in the era of retrospective protocols coupled with dose modulation (40%-80%phase) using Siemens® 64-slice Dual Source technology, with prospective scanning on the same equipment, as well as radiation doses on the newer Siemens® Flash Equipment and the implementation of nursing/technologist aggressively driven protocol for heart rate control and image acquisition independent of imaging provider presence during acquisition. Results: The radiation dose reduction with implementation of multiple measures of radiation reduction to include physician independent-technician driven CCTA protocol resulted in a reduction from mean of 9.85±5.96 (median 8.8mSv) to mean of 3.00±2.53(median 2.1mSv) (p<0.0001). CCTA radiation dose has decreased by 69.2% since January of 2010 while SPECT radiation dose remained constant at 14mSv (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Continued advances in software and hardware technology, combined with “physician independent-technician driven” CCTA protocol have drastically reduced radiation dosing in CCTA to annual background radiation exposure, while maximizing the benefit of the study and without sacrificing patient safety.