RESUMO
There is paucity of data on heart failure [HF] in the Gulf Middle East. The present paper describes the rationale, design, methodology and hospital characteristics of the first Gulf acute heart failure registry [Gulf CARE]. Gulf CARE is a prospective, multicenter, multinational registry of patients >18 year of age admitted with diagnosis of acute HF [AHF]. The data collected included demographics, clinical characteristics, etiology, precipitating factors, management and outcomes of patients admitted with AHF. In addition, data about hospital readmission rates, procedures and mortality at 3 months and 1-year follow-up were recorded. Hospital characteristics and care provider details were collected. Data were entered in a dedicated website using an electronic case record form. A total of 5005 consecutive patients were enrolled from February 14, 2012 to November 13, 2012. Forty-seven hospitals in 7 Gulf States [Oman, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Kuwait, United Gulf Emirates, Qatar and Bahrain] participated in the project. The majority of hospitals were community hospitals [46%; 22/47] followed by non-University teaching [32%; 15/47 and University hospitals [17%]. Most of the hospitals had intensive or coronary care unit facilities [93%; 44/47] with 59% [28/47] having catheterization laboratory facilities. However, only 29% [14/47] had a dedicated HF clinic facility. Most patients [71%] were cared for by a cardiologist. Gulf CARE is the first prospective registry of AHF in the Middle East, intending to provide a unique insight into the demographics, etiology, management and outcomes of AHF in the Middle East. HF management in the Middle East is predominantly provided by cardiologists. The data obtained from this registry will help the local clinicians to identify the deficiencies in HF management as well as provide a platform to implement evidence based preventive and treatment strategies to reduce the burden of HF in this region
RESUMO
To characterize risk profile of acute coronary syndrome [ACS] patients in different age groups and compare management provided to in-hospital outcome. Prospective multi-hospital registry. Seventeen secondary and tertiary care hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Five thousand and fifty-five patients with ACS. They were divided into four groups: /= 70 years. Main outcome measures: prevalence, utilization and mortality. Ninety-four percent of patients <40 years compared to 68% of patients >70 years were men. Diabetes was present in 70% of patients aged 56-70 years. Smoking was present in 66% of those <40 years compared to 7% of patients >70 years. Fifty-three percent of the patients >70 years and 25% of those <40 years had history of ischemic heart disease. Sixty percent of patients <40 years presented with ST elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] while non-ST elevation myocardial infarction was the presentation in 49% of patients >70 years. Thirty-four percent of patients >70 years compared to 10% of patients <40 years presented >12 h from symptom onset with STEMI. Fifty-four percent of patients >70 compared to 64-71% of those <70 years had coronary angiography. Twenty-four percent of patients >70 compared to 34-40% of those <70 years had percutaneous coronary intervention. Reperfusion shortfall for STEMI was 16-18% in patients >56 years compared to 11% in patients <40 years. Mortality was 7% in patients >70 years compared to 1.6-3% in patients <70 years. For all comparisons [p < 0.001]. Young and old ACS patients have unique risk factors and present differently. Older patients have higher in-hospital mortality as they are treated less aggressively. There is an urgent need for a national prevention