A Study on National Health Insurance Literacy among International Students in Korea and Their Medical Service Use

Background@#This study aimed to examine international students’ perceptions, characteristics, use of public medical services, and satisfaction with the National Health Insurance System, and compared the results with the Health Insurance System Perception Survey conducted on Korean population to understand the differences between the two groups’ perceptions of the health insurance system and their use of medical services. @*Methods@#A survey was conducted from May 23, 2022 to June 21, 2022 to measure various data of international students related to the National Health Insurance System and analyzed the results. @*Results@#Most international students were in their 20s (the average age was 23±2.06 years), which showed that they were less likely to use medical services compared to Korean population in their 20s. Both Korean population and international students viewed their subjective health as generally good. Regarding the perceptions of the National Health Insurance System, 75.6% of the Korean population responded positively, while only 16% of international students responded positively. The biggest reason for the negative responses was the higher contributions compared to private health insurance, showing that financial hardship played a large role in the negative perceptions. The insurance contribution calculation methods by the Government showed differences.International students receive the same insurance contributions regardless of their nationality, age, income, or assets. @*Conclusions@#Through this study, it has been confirmed that further research and examination are needed regarding the application of Korean health insurance to foreign residents and the appropriate calculation of insurance contributions.

National Trend of Uroflowmetry, Urodynamic Study and Cystoscopy Considering the Change in the Population Structure in Korea from 2010 to 2015

BACKGROUND: Although lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) show a higher prevalence with age, few studies have reported the trend of these examination tools including uroflowmetry, urodynamic study and cystoscopy. METHODS: We evaluated the trend of performance of uroflowmetry, urodynamic study and cystoscopy by using National Health Insurance Data from 2010 to 2015. Primary outcome findings included cumulative number of patients per year, cumulative age-standardized patient rate per year and per age group, and correlation between the number of patients per year and the percentage of population per year in each age group. RESULTS: The overall trend for frequency of uroflowmetry and cystoscopy showed an increasing pattern (P < 0.001, respectively) while the trend for frequency of urodynamic study showed a decreasing pattern (P < 0.001). After age standardization, the overall trend showed similar results. Correlation between the number of patients per year and the percentage of population per year showed a positive correlation in the 50s age group and the above 70s age group (P = 0.003 and < 0.01, respectively) on uroflowmetry and in the above 70s age group (P < 0.01) on cystoscopy. Urodynamic study showed negative correlations in the 50s age group and the above 60s age group (P = 0.001 and 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: National trend for frequency of uroflowmetry, urodynamic study and cystoscopy showed a different trend. The increasing trend of uroflowmetry and cystoscopy was related with growth of the aged population. However, urodynamic study showed a decreasing trend regardless of the age group.

Geographic Distribution of Urologists in Korea, 2007 to 2012

The adequacy of the urologist work force in Korea has never been investigated. This study investigated the geographic distribution of urologists in Korea. County level data from the National Health Insurance Service and National Statistical Office was analyzed in this ecological study. Urologist density was defined by the number of urologists per 100,000 individuals. National patterns of urologist density were mapped graphically at the county level using GIS software. To control the time sequence, regression analysis with fitted line plot was conducted. The difference of distribution of urologist density was analyzed by ANCOVA. Urologists density showed an uneven distribution according to county characteristics (metropolitan cities vs. nonmetropolitan cities vs. rural areas; mean square=102.329, P<0.001) and also according to year (mean square=9.747, P=0.048). Regression analysis between metropolitan and non-metropolitan cities showed significant difference in the change of urologists per year (P=0.019). Metropolitan cities vs. rural areas and non-metropolitan cities vs. rural areas showed no differences. Among the factors, the presence of training hospitals was the affecting factor for the uneven distribution of urologist density (P<0.001).Uneven distribution of urologists in Korea likely originated from the relatively low urologist density in rural areas. However, considering the time sequencing data from 2007 to 2012, there was a difference between the increase of urologist density in metropolitan and non-metropolitan cities.