Comparison of Tunnel Enlargement between Single and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the tunnel enlargement in patients who had undergone a double-bundle (DB) or single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and to determine the correlation between the extent of bone tunnel enlargement and the clinical results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 224 primary ACL reconstructions performed from January 2004 to May 2008 we examined in this study 38 patients who underwent a SB-ACL reconstruction and 30 patients underwent a DB-ACL reconstruction. They were followed up over 1 year. The evaluation methods were the Lachman test, pivot-shift test and KT-1000 measurement for knee stability and the Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) ratings for the functional results. Tunnel enlargement was measured at the sclerotic ridge of the most widest area on the anteroposterior and lateral radiographs in longitudinal and vertical axis of the tunnel. RESULTS: The tunnel enlargement on the femoral side was similar in the DB-ACL group and the SB-ACL group. On the other hand, on the tibial side, the tunnel enlargement was less in the DB-ACL group than in the SB-ACL group (p=0.001, ICC: 0.94). The two groups showed different functional results and extent of stability recovery. The KT-1000 arthrometer revealed 1.1 mm and 93% of negative in the pivot-shift test for the DB-ACL group, which induced an improved tendency compared to the SB-ACL group. No correlation was found between the tunnel enlargement and clinical results. CONCLUSION: A DB-ACL reconstruction results in less tunnel enlargement on the tibial side than a SB-ACL reconstruction. There was no correlation between the tunnel enlargement and clinical results.

Comparison of Clinical Results for Repairing Lateral Discoid Meniscus Tear between the Contouring Surgery Group and the Additional Repair Group

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the clinical results of treating lateral discoid meniscus tear between the contouring surgery group and the additional repair group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 60 cases (58 patients) with lateral discoid meniscus tear and who were arthroscopically treated between September 2003 and February 2007 and we followed them for at least two years. The sixty cases were divided into two groups: thirty-two cases underwent contouring surgery (Group A) and twenty-eight cases underwent contouring surgery and repair (Group B). The duration of symptoms, the tear patterns and clinical results between the two groups were investigated. RESULTS: The most frequent types of tear pattern were longitudinal and central hole tears in group A, while complex tear was most common in group B. The mean duration of the symptoms was 5.6 months (range: 1~24) in group A and 16.6 months (range: 1~84) in group B, which was statistically significant (p=0.025). Based on Ikeuchi's grading, the proportions with good or excellent outcomes were not different between the two groups (p=0.12). However, group A had a larger proportion of excellent outcomes (p=0.031) than group B. CONCLUSION: The contouring surgery and additional repair group had a significant longer duration of symptoms, a more complex tear pattern and less excellent results than did the contouring group.