Considerations for clinical evaluation of the effects of bariatric surgery on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered drugs

Obesity has been a growing worldwide concern, and surgical intervention including bariatric surgery is considered as one of the options for treatment. However, there still is controversy over the change in pharmacokinetics (PKs) of drugs after the surgery. To investigate the potential covariates that can influence the area under the curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the design of previous studies was reviewed based on pre-determined eligibility criteria. Each study calculated the ratios of the AUC and Cmax before and after bariatric surgery. These studies investigated whether the PK parameters were affected by the time after the surgery or by the type of control group. The ratio of the AUC calculated in the early and late follow-up period was similar across Roux-en Y gastric bypass patients. No significant difference in the PK parameters was found between the pre-surgical patients and matched healthy subjects. However, certain control groups could be preferable depending on the purpose of the clinical trial. Although Cmax was inconsistent compared to the AUC, insufficient sampling of the time points may have caused such an inconsistency. This is the first article exploring the appropriate methodology in designing clinical studies for changes in the PK characteristics of orally administered drugs in patients with bariatric surgery.

Therapeutic drug monitoring on the use of transplacental digoxin in fetal tachyarrhythmia: a case report

Fetal tachycardia (FT) is a rare disorder and is associated with significant mortality of fetus. Digoxin is one of the antiarrhythmic agents used to treat FT via transplacental therapy. In this report, we describe a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) case of digoxin during the treatment of FT. A 40-year-old woman, gravida 2 para 1, hospitalized to control FT as the fetal heart rate (FHR) showed over 200 bpm on ultrasonography at 29 weeks of gestation. She did not have any medical or medication history and showed normal electrolytes level on clinical laboratory test results. For the treatment of FT loading and maintenance dose of intravenous digoxin (loading dose: 0.6 mg; maintenance dose: 0.3 mg every 8 hours) were administered. To monitor the efficacy and safety of the treatment, TDM was conducted with a target maternal serum trough digoxin concentration of 1.0 to 2.0 ng/mL, as well as ultrasonography and maternal electrocardiogram. The observed digoxin serum concentrations were 0.67, 0.83, and 1.05 ng/mL after 1, 2, and 5 days after the initiation of digoxin therapy, respectively. Although the serum digoxin concentrations reached the target range, the FHR did not improve. Therefore, digoxin was discontinued, and oral flecainide therapy was started. The FHR adjusted to the normal range within 2 days from changing treatment and remained stable. TDM of digoxin along with the monitoring of clinical responses can give valuable information for decision-making during the treatment FT.