Monitoring of antibody levels in healthcare workers after inactivated coronavirus disease 19 vaccination

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: Because of the coronavirus disease 19 pandemic, studies on vaccination are being conducted in our country as well as across the world. In this study, the antibody levels in healthcare workers vaccinated with two doses of inactivated vaccine and the factors affecting these levels were investigated. METHODS: Randomly selected volunteers from healthcare workers, who had been vaccinated with two doses of inactivated vaccine in January to February 2021, were included in the study. Blood samples were drawn twice, 1 month and 6 months after the second dose vaccine (CoronaVac:Sinovac Life Science Co, Ltd, Beijing, China). The antibody levels were determined by the chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay method using kits for quantitative detection of immunoglobulin class G antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. RESULTS: The mean antibody levels of 129 volunteers were 1232.5 (min: 103 to max: 7151) AU/mL in the first month and 403.5 (min: 23 to max: 4963) AU/mL in the sixth month. According to the survey results, 91 (71%) volunteers had not been diagnosed with coronavirus disease 19 before vaccination. The antibody levels 1 month and 6 months after the second dose of vaccination were significantly higher in those who had been diagnosed with coronavirus disease 19 before vaccination than in those who had not. It was found that age, gender, fast food, or healthy nutrition had no effect on antibody levels. CONCLUSION: Vaccines are very important both to protect against coronavirus disease 19 and to experience only a mild form of the disease. Immunoglobulin class G levels formed after vaccination may be affected by many factors and may decrease over time.

Evaluation of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in patients with cellulitis

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE Cellulite infection is a non-necrotizing inflammation of the skin and subcutaneous tissue and is one of the most common reasons for admission to hospital. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), and Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio (LMR) in patients with cellulitis. METHODS In our study, we retrospectively analyzed 96 patients with cellulitis and 98 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. The study and control groups were compared regarding NLR, PLR, and LMR.0.001). When patients with cellulitis were divided into two groups, i.e., ≥65 years and <65 years, a statistically significant difference was noted in the NLR and LMR values (p < 0.05). In the ROC curve analysis, NLR had the highest discriminative power in distinguishing between cellulitis and healthy controls (AUC = 0.950, 95% CI: 0.920-0.979, p < 0.001; 91.6% sensitivity and 89.8% specificity). CONCLUSION NLR was significantly higher in differentiating cellulite and in patients older than 65 years. Larger, prospective studies are required to determine its usefulness in assessing differential diagnosis and prognosis in cellulitis patients.

RESUMO OBJETIVO A celulite infecciosa é uma inflamação não necrotizante da pele e do tecido subcutâneo e uma das causas mais comuns para internação. O objetivo deste estudo retrospectivo foi investigar as relações Neutrófilo/Linfócito (RNL), Plaqueta/Linfócito (RPL) e Linfócito/Monócito (RLM) em pacientes com celulite. MÉTODOS Nós analisamos, retrospectivamente, 96 pacientes com celulite e 98 controles saudáveis equivalentes em sexo e idade. Os grupos foram comparados quanto a RNL, RPL e RLM. RESULTADOS Os valores de RPL e RNL do grupo com celulite foram significativamente mais elevados do que os do grupo de controle (p < 0,001). Após dividir os pacientes com celulite em dois grupos, ≥65 anos e <65 anos, uma diferença estatisticamente significativa foi observada nos valores de RNL e RLM (p < 0,05). Na análise da curva ROC, a RNL apresentou o maior poder de discriminação para distinguir entre pacientes com celulite e controles saudáveis (AUC = 0,950, 95% CI: 0,920 - 0,979; p < 0,001; 91,6% de sensibilidade e 89,8% de especificidade). CONCLUSÃO O valor de RNL foi significativamente maior para a diferenciação de pacientes com celulite e pacientes com mais de 65 anos. Estudos prospectivos maiores são necessários para determinar a sua utilidade na avaliação de diagnósticos diferenciais e prognósticos em pacientes com celulite.