Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy without a Camera Operator

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of solo surgery using a laparoscopic scope holder for single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC). METHODS: With a glove port and a flexible high-definition scope, SILC was performed through a single trans-umbilical incisional site with CO2 pneumoperitoneum at a pressure of 12 mmHg. Fifty-eight patients who underwent solo SILC using a scope holder (Solo-SILC) were compared to 15 patients who underwent camera operator-assisted SILC (Ca-SILC) in terms of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: The mean BMI and operation time were 23.0±3.6 kg/m² and 64.4±16.6 min in Ca-SILC and 25.0±3.8 kg/m² and 58.2±27.1 min in Solo-SILC, respectively (p=0.067 and p=0.410). Estimated blood loss was negligible and an additional assistant port was not required in either groups. A case of gallbladder perforation and bile leak was noted in the Ca-SILC group, and 13 cases of bile leak in the Solo-SILC group, with no significant differences (p=0.167) during the surgery. Postoperative outcomes including surgical complications, diet restriction, diarrhea and hospital stay were not significantly different except for shoulder pain (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Even with the limitations of a small number of patients, Solo-SILC proved to be a feasible technique. To confirm the safety of solo-SILC, further studies with a larger sample size are required.

Solo Three-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using a Laparoscopic Scope Holder for Acute Cholecystitis

PURPOSE: L aparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) i s a c ommonly p erformed procedure for t he management of acute cholecystitis. The presence of an inexperienced scopist or a shortage of manpower could be problematic in emergency surgical cases. To overcome these potential problems while ensuring a stable surgical view during LC, we performed solo surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the results of 22 patients who underwent solo three-incision LC (S-TILC) and 31 patients who underwent the conventional three-incision LC (C-TILC) from March 1, 2015, to August 31, 2015. We compared the two groups with respect to the patients' clinical characteristics, and intraoperative and postoperative results; and severity grade as defined by the updated Tokyo guidelines 2013 (TG13) criteria. RESULTS: No significant differences in baseline characteristics were found between the two groups. The intraoperative perforation rates were higher in the C-TILC group than in the S-TILC group (p=0.016). Two cases were converted to human-assisted LC in the S-TILC group because of severe adhesions and the scope holder breaking down. No significant differences were found between the groups with respect to length of hospital stay; postoperative diet habit; or rates of post-cholecystectomy diarrhea, abdominal pain, wound complication, or complication according to the Clavien-Dindo grade. CONCLUSION: S-TILC and C-TILC were comparable in terms of results, and this solo surgery in LC could be performed for cases of acute cholecystitis during shortage of skilled manpower.