The Study of Combined Treatment in Locally Advanced Non - Small Cell Lung Cancer / 대한내과학회지

BACKGROUND: The majority of patients with locally advanced, unresectable, non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) were treated with conventional thoracic radiation therapy Throcic radiation therapy produces tumor regression in most patients but few cures and dismal 5-year survival rate. Several randomized studies have demonstrated that systemic chemotherapy controls micrometastasis and improve survival ratNes for patients who have locally advanced NSCI.C. Hut the optimal frequency of chemotherapy and sequence for chemotherapy and radiotherapy are yet to be determined. In this study, we analyzed response rate, median survival time, side effects and prognostic variables according to the frequency of chemotheray in locally advanced NSCLC patients. METHODS: We separated locally advanced, unresectable, NSCLC patients into two groups according to given number of chemotherapy cycles. Among 28 patients evaluated, eleven patients were classified to group A, receiving above 3 cycled chemotherapy and seventeen patients, classified to group B, receiving 3 cycled chemotherapy. In both groups, thoracic irradiation of 5940 cGy was given to all patients after chemotherapy. RESULTS: 1) Median survival time was 12.9 months for group A, 12.8 months for group B but there was no statistically significant difference(P>0.05), 2) Overall response rates were not significantly different between two groups(P>0.05). 3) Frequency rate of local failure and distant metastasis were not significantly different between two groups (P>0.05). 4) The grade and frequency of toxicities during treatment were not significantly different between two groups (P>0.05). 5) Clinical stage was the only major prognostic factor for overall survival (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Median survival time, response rate, toxicities and frequency of local failure and distant metastasis were not significantly different between two groups. So, when we treat locally advanced, unresectable, NSCLC patients in sequential combined treatement, we should consider planned therapy(limiting chemotherapy cycles given), because planned therapy reduces many troubles of patients, that is, economic loss and time consuming, psychiatric anxiety etc, during treatment period. The optimal frequency of chemotherapy is remained to be validated in large scale study in the future in the setting of combined treatment.

The effects according to the timing of thoracic radiotherapyin limited stage small cell lung cancer / 결핵

Background: Combination chemotherapy is now considered to be the cornerstone of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). management but the optimal management of limited SCLC is not well defined. The role of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) is less well established. Recent meta-analyses reports revealed that TRT combined with chemotherapy produce "good" local control and prolonged survival. But other reports that survival was not changed. The timing, dose, volume and fractionation for TRT with the combined chemotherapy of SCLC remains unsettled. In this study, we analyzed the effects according to the timing of thoracic radiotherapy in limited SCLC. Method: All fifty one patients received cytoxan, adriamycin and vincristine(CAV) alternating with etoposide and cisplatin(VPP) every 3 weeks for 6 cycles were randomized prospectively into two groups: concurrent and sequential. 27 patients received 4500cGy in 30 fractions(twice daily 150cGy fractional dose) over 3 weeks to the primary site concurrent with the first cycle of VPP(concurrent gorup). 24 patients received 4000 to 5000cGy over 5 or 6 weeks after completion of sixth cycles of chemotherapy(sequential group). Results: 1. Response rates and response duration: Response rates were not significantly different between two groups(p=0.13). But response duration was superior in the concurrent group(p=0.03). 2. Survival duration was not different between two groups(p=0.33). 3. Local control rate was superior in the concurrent group(p=0.00). 4. Side effects and toxicities: Hematologic toxicides, especially leukopenia, infection and frequency of radiation esophagitis were higher in the concurrent group(p=0.00, 0.03, 0.03). Conclusion: The concurrent use of TRT with chemotherapy failed to improve the survival of limited stage SCLC patients compared with the sequential use of TRT but response duration and local control rate were superior in the concurrent group. Frequency of radiation esophagitis, life threatening hematologic toxicities and infection were more frequent in the concurrent group than sequential group. So, the selection of an optimal schedule of chemotherapy combined with TRT that would lead to a major increase in survival with minimal toxicity is remained to be validated in large scale study in the future.