Labia Majora Share

Defects involving specialised areas with characteristic anatomical features, such as the nipple, upper eyelid, and lip, benefit greatly from the use of sharing procedures. The vulva, a complex 3-dimensional structure, can also be reconstructed through a sharing procedure drawing upon the contralateral vulva. In this report, we present the interesting case of a patient with chronic, massive, localised lymphedema of her left labia majora that was resected in 2011. Five years later, she presented with squamous cell carcinoma over the left vulva region, which is rarely associated with chronic lymphedema. To the best of our knowledge, our management of the radical vulvectomy defect with a labia majora sharing procedure is novel and has not been previously described. The labia major flap presented in this report is a shared flap; that is, a transposition flap based on the dorsal clitoral artery, which has consistent vascular anatomy, making this flap durable and reliable. This procedure epitomises the principle of replacing like with like, does not interfere with leg movement or patient positioning, has minimal donor site morbidity, and preserves other locoregional flap options for future reconstruction. One limitation is the need for a lax contralateral vulva. This labia majora sharing procedure is a viable option in carefully selected patients.

Comparison of risk of malignancy indices in evaluating ovarian masses in a Southeast Asian population

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>The risk of malignancy index (RMI) is a scoring system used to triage benign from malignant ovarian masses. We compared the specificity and sensitivity of the four indices (RMI 1, RMI 2, RMI 3 and RMI 4) to discriminate a benign ovarian mass from a malignant one in a Southeast Asian population.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>This was a five-year retrospective study of women who were admitted for surgery due to ovarian masses. RMI scores were calculated based on standardised preoperative cancer antigen (CA)-125 levels, ultrasonography findings, menopausal status and tumour size based on ultrasonography. Postoperative histopathologic diagnosis was regarded as the definite outcome. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, and Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the individual RMI scores between the benign and malignant cases.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Out of the 480 patients reviewed, 228 women aged 10-65 years were included in the study. Of these, 17 (7.5%) had malignant disease and 211 (92.5%) had benign pathology. There was no statistical difference in the RMI 1, 2, 3 and 4 scores between the benign and malignant cases. Individual variables that were analysed showed significant differences in median CA-125 level and tumour size (p = 0.044 and p < 0.0005, respectively) between the benign and malignant cases.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Our study shows that RMI is not a valuable triage tool for our Southeast Asian population. Further prospective validation, with regard to standardising results in different patient populations and centres, is required.</p>