RESUMO
Objective:To analyze the cost difference between bilateral surgery and unilateral surgery in the same diagnosis-related group(DRG), and to explore the necessity of coefficient adjustment in DRG payment for bilateral surgery.Methods:The medical record frontpage information of all discharged patients who were divided into FJ25(complicated operation of venous system, without complications and accompanying diseases)by DRG in a tertiary hospital from 2017 to 2019 was selected, and the cost difference between unilateral operation and bilateral operation was compared.Results:A total of 359 patients were included, including 230 patients(64.07%) in unilateral operation group and 129 patients(35.93%) in bilateral operation group. There was no significant difference in gender, age and length of hospital stay between unilateral operation group and bilateral operation group( P>0.05). The hospitalization expenses of the bilateral operation group were higher than those of the unilateral operation group( P<0.05), and the differences mainly came from the expenses of consumables, operation, anesthesia and drugs. There was no significant difference in the expenses of diagnosis and treatment, and the cost of inspection between the two groups( P>0.05). The individual burden of patients with medical insurance in bilateral operation group was higher than that in unilateral operation group. Conclusions:In the same DRG group, the adjustment coefficient can be used to adjust the medical insurance payment for bilateral surgery, so as to avoid the occurrence of clinical decomposition hospitalization behavior.
RESUMO
Objective To investigate the impacts on inpatient costs of a hospital in Beijing as incurred by the reform of clinic-pharmacy-separation by means of DRGs. Methods As required by BJ-DRGs, we selected DRGs grouping information and medical record homepage information of the inpatients discharged from a tertiary hospital in Beijing from January to March in 2017 ( pre-reform group ) and that from May to July in 2017 ( the post-reform group ) . Then we compared the differences of inpatient costs before and after the reform, and the inpatient cost changes of the DRGs groups. Results The median of inpatient costs before the reform was 8751. 21 yuan, and that after the reform was 8522. 07 yuan, a difference without statistical significance (P>0. 05). Of the 104 DRGs studied, cost changes were found in 28 DRGs (P<0. 05), with increases in 19 DRGs and drops in 9 DRGs groups. Conclusions The reform, though without impact on the inpatient costs, changed the makeup of costs on the other hand, especially on HJ13 and BB25 DRGs groups, worthy of attention. A dynamic tuning mechanism is thus suggested for pricing of medical services, and a fine management suggested for the hospitals to curb unreasonable growth of costs.
RESUMO
Objective To investigate the impacts on inpatient costs of a hospital in Beijing as incurred by the reform of clinic-pharmacy-separation by means of DRGs. Methods As required by BJ-DRGs, we selected DRGs grouping information and medical record homepage information of the inpatients discharged from a tertiary hospital in Beijing from January to March in 2017 ( pre-reform group ) and that from May to July in 2017 ( the post-reform group ) . Then we compared the differences of inpatient costs before and after the reform, and the inpatient cost changes of the DRGs groups. Results The median of inpatient costs before the reform was 8751. 21 yuan, and that after the reform was 8522. 07 yuan, a difference without statistical significance (P>0. 05). Of the 104 DRGs studied, cost changes were found in 28 DRGs (P<0. 05), with increases in 19 DRGs and drops in 9 DRGs groups. Conclusions The reform, though without impact on the inpatient costs, changed the makeup of costs on the other hand, especially on HJ13 and BB25 DRGs groups, worthy of attention. A dynamic tuning mechanism is thus suggested for pricing of medical services, and a fine management suggested for the hospitals to curb unreasonable growth of costs.