RESUMO
Objective:In this study, we compared the funding rates of applicants who participated in the expert preliminary counseling with those who did not, to explore the role of the expert preliminary counseling in improving the funding rate of the National Natural Science Fund, so as to provide further reference for the management of scientific research.Methods:Statistical methods was used to analyze relevant data from 2012 to 2019 to compare the approval and funding rate of the applicants that participated in and did not participate in the expert preliminary counseling using.Results:From 2012 to 2019, the proportion of funded applicants in the expert preliminary counselling group was 30.45%, and the overall funding rate was 18.51%. Under the same research basis, the funding rate of the group was 29.91%, which was significantly higher than the group did not participate in the expert preliminary counselling (funding rare: 13.59%, P<0.001). Conclusions:We should pay more attention to and participate actively in the expert preliminary counselling, which can increase the quality of the projects and improve their funding rate significantly.