Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine ; (36): 353-356, 2021.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-883446

RESUMO

Objective:To investigate the masticatory function and the expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α) in gingival crevicular fluid.Methods:The clinical data of 98 patients with dentition loss admitted to Tongxiang First People′s Hospital from June 2017 to June 2019 were analyzed, and 49 cases were treated with oral implant repair(observation group) and 49 cases were treated with conventional repair(control group). Both groups were followed up for 6 months. The masticatory function, speech function, retention function, quality of life and the changes of MCP-1 and TNF-α in gingival crevicular fluid were compared before treatment and 6 months after treatment.Results:The total effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group: 95.92%(47/49) vs. 79.59%(39/49), and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=6.078, P<0.05). At 6 months after treatment, the scores of masticatory function, speech function and retention function in the observation group were higher than those in the control group ( P<0.05). The scores of emotional function, social function and physiological function in the observation group were higher than those in the control group ( P<0.05). The levels of MCP-1 and TNF-α in gingival crevicular fluid of the observation group were lower than those of the control group: (32.09 ± 7.65) μg/L vs. (43.62 ± 9.23) μg/L, (2.19 ± 0.38) μg/L vs. (3.20 ± 0.51) μg/L, and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Dental implant repair is effective for patients with dentition loss, and it can improve masticatory function and quality of life, and reduce the expression of MCP-1 and TNF-α in gingival crevicular fluid.

2.
Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery ; (12)2005.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-596484

RESUMO

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelo-ureterolithotomy. Methods Totally 52 cases of unilateral urinary calculi were treated with retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelo-ureterolithotomy in our hospital. All the patients received placement of ureteral stent during the operation. Results All the operations were completed successfully without conversion to open surgery. The time of the operation varied from 50 to 200 minutes with a mean of 110 minutes. The patients were discharged from hospital in 5 to 14 days (mean,7.5 days). Eight weeks after the operation,the stent was withdrawn from the patients. Follow-up was achieved in all of the patients for six months. Ultrasonography showed that the hydronephrosis disappeared in 21 cases at 3 months,and in 32 patients at 6 months. None of the cases had recurrence. ECT showed an increased GFR in eight patients with severe hydronephrosis (increased from a mean of 16 ml/min before the operation to 25 ml/min). Conclusions Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelo-ureterolithotomy is effective,safe,and less invasive for the calculi in the renal pelvic and upper ureter.

3.
Herald of Medicine ; (12): 221-222, 2001.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-433996

RESUMO

To observe the analgesic effects of morphine and bupivacaine for the patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) after prostatectomy. Methods: 21 patients after receiving prostatectomy were treated with PCEA including morphine and bupivacaine, and 24 patients were treated with routine analgesia as control. The effects of analgesia with visual analogue scale (VAS) were evaluated indirectly, and episodes of bl adder spasm were recoreded. Results: The effects of PCEA on postoperative analgesia and controlling bladder spasm were much better than that of routine analgesia. Conclusion: Effects of morphine and bupivacaine used in PCEA for post-prostatectomy analgesia are confirmed adm inistration is slimple. Because of their dosage is smalller and side effects are fewer, this treating protocol is beneficial for the recovery of the patients re ceiving prostatectomy.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA