RESUMO
The history of automated blood cell analysis and current situation regarding the peripheral blood smear review following automated complete blood count(CBC) and leukocyte differential count(LDC) was introduced. Principles and procedure of determining criteria for blood smear review in clinical laboratory was elucidated in combination with 41 consensus rules for the review of automated CBC and LDC proposed by the International Consensus Group for blood smear review.
RESUMO
0.99). DC: reproducibility was good for neutrophils, lymphocytes monocytes, eosinophils and basophils. Comparison of the results by instrument with manual for normal samples in morphology, the correlation was better for neutrophils, lymphocytes and eosinophils (r:0.968～0.983) ,good for monocytes(r=0.917), not good for basophils(r=0.659);The WBC scattergram would change and alarm flags would display when there are neutrophilic stab granulocytes, abnormal or atypical lymphocytes and immature cells in higher proportion.Conclusions The analyzer can be used to test blood cell parameters accurately and reliably. Its main performance indices accorded with the experimental requirements; The results were credible. It is necessary to check with microscopy for DC before reported when it were doubtted.
RESUMO
0.98); immature cells would display in the WBC histogram when in higher proportion. Conclusions The analyzer can be used to test blood cell parameters accurately and reliably. Its main performance indices accorded with the experimental requirements; The results were credible. It is necessary to checked with microscopy for DC before reported.
RESUMO
0.05).RBC and haematocrit(HCT)were significantly decreased(P