Pathological features and clinicopathological significance of TERT promoter mutation in breast fibroepithelial tumors without definite diagnosis / 中华病理学杂志

Objective: To investigate the pathological features and the clinicopathological significance of TERT detection in those tumors that were difficult to diagnosis. Methods: A total of 93 cases of fibroepithelial tumors without definite diagnosis were collected from the Affiliated Hospital of Qigndao University between 2013 and 2021. The clinical details such as patients' age and tumor size were collected. All slides were re-reviewed and the pathologic parameters, including stromal cellularity, stromal cell atypia, stromal cell mitoses, and stromal overgrowth were re-interpreted. Sanger sequencing was used to detect TERT promoter status, and immunohistochemistry was performed to detect TERT protein expression. The relationship between TERT promoter mutation as well as protein expression levels and the clinicopathological parameters were also analyzed. Results: The patients' ages ranged from 30 to 71 years (mean of 46 years); the tumor size ranged from 1.2 to 8.0 cm (mean 3.8 cm). These tumors showed the following morphologic features: leafy structures in the background of fibroadenoma, or moderately to severely abundant stromal cells. The interpretations of tumor border status were ambiguous in some cases. The incidence of TERT promoter mutation was high in patients of age≥50 years, tumor size≥4 cm, and stromal overgrowth at ×4 or ×10 objective, and these clinicopathologic features were in favor of diagnosis of phyllodes tumors. TERT protein expression levels was not associated with the above clinicopathologic parameters and its promoter mutation status. Conclusions: The diagnostic difficulty for the breast fibroepithelial tumors is due to the difficulty in recognition of the leafy structures or in those cases with abundant stromal cells. A comprehensive evaluation combined with morphologic characteristics and molecular parameters such as TERT promoter may be helpful for the correct diagnosis and better evaluating recurrence risk.

Effects of miRNA-1,miRNA-21 in plasma on in-stent restenosis in patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus after percutaneous coronary intervention / 中国应用生理学杂志

OBJECTIVE@#To observe the expression differences of the plasma miRNA-1, miRNA-21 between patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and without coronary artery lesions, between patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) and none in-stent restenosis (NISR), and to study their predictive value for ISR occurred after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with CHD and diabetes mellitus (DM).@*METHODS@#The selected subjects were divided into CHD group in which patients were implemented stenting (=187), and control group in which patients were without coronary artery lesions (=195). According to the guidelines, the control group was divided into normal group (=150), simple-DM group (=45); the CHD group was divided into simple-CHD group (=119) and CHD-DM group (=68), the CHD group was also divided into ISR group (=48), NISR group (=139), and the ISR group was divided into simple-ISR group (=26) and ISR-DM group (=22) again. Plasma was collected from each group, and total RNA was extracted, the level of blood miRNA-1, miRNA-21 of each group was detected, and their level differences were analyzed.@*RESULTS@#Compared with control group, the level of miRNA-1 and miRNA-21 of CHD group was increased (<0.05); compared with NISR group, the level of miRNA-1 and miRNA-21 of ISR group was increased (<0.05). The incidence of ISR of CHD-DM group was obviously higher than that of simple-CHD group, ISR-DM group's level of miRNA-21 was higher than that of simple-ISR group (<0.05), and there was no difference of miRNA-1 level between ISR and ISR-DM group (<0.05). In Logistics, for CHD patents, the OR of DM, miRNA-1, miRNA-21 were 2.132, 3.066, 1.924 respectively (<0.05); for CHD patents with ISR, the OR of DM, miRNA-21 were 2.123, 3.066 respectively (<0.05); especially for CHD and DM patents with ISR, the OR of miRNA-21 was 9.148 (<0.05). In ROC curve, for CHD patients with ISR, the AUC of miRNA-1, miRNA-21 were 0.854, 0.857 respectively; for CHD-DM patients with ISR, the AUC of miRNA-21 was 0.783.@*CONCLUSIONS@#To predict the occurrence of ISR for CHD patients, the plasma miRNA-1 and miRNA-21 have a relatively high specificity and sensitivity, for CHD patients with DM, miRNA-21 may have a higher clinical value.