RESUMO
Objective To study the relationship between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and positive IgA antibodies of EB virus nuclear antigen 1 (NA),EB virus capsular antigen (VCA) and EB virus Zta protein.Methods The serum EB virus VCA-IgA,NA1-IgA and Zta-IgA antibody in 17 175 cases were detected by ELISA.782 cases of EB virus antibody-positive subjects were further given nasopharyngeal CT imaging,electronic nasopharyngoscopy.Finally confirmed by biopsy and immunohistochemistry.Comparison of serology results EB antibody-positive individual,while the two antibody-positive and antibody while three positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma detection rate,combined with evaluation of EB virus antibody detection in nasopharyngeal carcinoma screening value of high-risk groups.Results 17 175 cases of medical groups,the EB virus antibodies were detected in 782 cases,with the most positive individual,accounting for 535 cases (68.41％),nasopharyngeal cancer diagnosed in 15 cases (2.80％);two antibody positive while 213 cases (27.24 ％),diagnosed 49 cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (23.00％);least three antibody positive while only 34 cases (4.35％),nasopharyngeal cancer diagnosed 18 patients (52.94％);by physical examination,in 16,393 cases of EB virus antibody negative population by nasopharyngoscopy and throat CT and other medical examination,the final diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in 6 cases (0.04％).Conclusion Three EB virus antibody combined detection greatly improves the rate of nasopharyngeal cancer diagnosis;we must also do other physical examination to prevent EB virus antibody-negative nasopharyngeal crowd missed.
RESUMO
Objective To assess the test-retest reliability of pressure biofeedback in measuring intra abdominal pressure in the lumbar region for normal subjects .Methods We choosed 33 subjects (20 to 27 years old) and asked them to do four movements (movement A :prone position ;movement B :supine position with flexion hip and knee joint ;movement C :supine position with single flexion hip and knee joint ;movement D :prone position with flexion shoulder joint ;) by using pressure biofeedback twice totally ,and the last measurement should be done after 24 h .The indicator of test-retest reliability of joint position was intraclass correlation co-efficient (ICC) .Results The test-retest reliability of intra abdominal pressure was modest in the four movements in the lumbar re-gion ,and the values of ICC were from 0 .786 - 0 .848 .The test-retest reliability of intra abdominal pressure was good in Movement A [ICC(95% CI)= 0 .817(0 .630 - 0 .910)] ,Movement B [ICC(95% CI)= 0 .848 (0 .692 - 0 .925)] ,Movement D [ICC(95% CI)= 0 .841(0 .678 - 0 .921)] .And the test-retest reliability of intra abdominal pressure was good in Movement C [ICC (95% CI) =0 .786(0 .566 - 0 .894)] .Conclusion The test-retest reliability of intra abdominal pressure was modest and good in the lumbar re-gion ,and pressure biofeedback could be useful to assess intra abdominal pressure .
RESUMO
BACKGROUND:Treatment programs for low back pain are of great varieties, but there is stil no a definite treatment. Pressure biofeedback instrument is a tool to measure abdominal muscle activity, and its reliability in the treatment of low back pain is less reported. OBJECTIVE:To explore the reliability and feasibility of the pressure biofeedback instrument for assessment of low back pain. METHODS:Thirty patients with chronic low back pain were enrol ed and subject to four kinds of postures:posture A was prone position;posture B was supine position with flexion of the knee joints, posture C was supine position with unilateral flexion of the hip and knee joint, posture D was prone position with unilateral shoulder flexion. Intra-abdominal pressure values under the different postures were measured twice within a week in the same subject. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the reliability. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Posture A had good test-retest reliability, and the value of ICC was 0.853 (95%confidence interval:0.691-0.930);posture B showed moderate test-retest reliability, and the ICC value was 0.751 (95%confidence interval:0.477-0.882);posture C also had moderate test-retest reliability, and the ICC value was 0.789 (95%confidence interval:0.557-0.900), posture D had good test-retest reliability, and the value of ICC was 0.892 (95%confidence interval:0.641-0.919). Therefore, the pressure biofeedback for evaluation of low back pain has good reliability, which can be used for the evaluation of low back pain.