RESUMO
Objective To investigate the safety of endoscopic suhmucosal dissection (ESD) in elderly patients with lesions of gastroesophageal mucosa. Methods Thirty-six elderly patients with flat elevation lesion of gastroesophageal mucosa were studied from July 2007 to May 2008. There were 14 cases with dysplasia, 9 cases with early carcinoma and 13 cases with leiomyoma confirmed by pathologic biopsy and endoscopic ultrasonography. All the patients were treated under consciousness condition, and the focus of lesion were completely resected with improved hook knife, IT knife and electrocoagulation or electro-cutting technique. The wound surface was managed with noradrenaline added in ice physiological saline, argon beam coagulator and metal clips. After operation, they were treated by abrosia, acid suppression and mucosa protection. The conditions of wound healing and residual lesions were reexamined four weeks after operation. Results Among the 36 patients (19 males and 17 females), there were 29 patients(80.6%) with complete focus ablation by ESD and 7 patients (19.4%) with resection by snare. Three cases (8.3%) of perforation occurred during operation and the perforations were treated with metal clips. After inserting stomach tube for fasting and anti-infection treatment for 5-7 days, all the three cases were recovered. One case(2.8%)had hematemesis 2 hours after operation and bleeding was stopped by endoscopic metal clip. Conclusions ESD is a safe and effective therapeutic tool in elderly patients with lesions of gastroesophageal mucosa.
RESUMO
Objective To discuss the safety of endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) in treatment of choledocholithiasis in patients over 80 years.Methods From 2005 to 2007,893 patients with choledocholithiasis were divided into group A (n= 148,aged over 80 years) and group B (n=745,aged below 60 years).The clinical data,complications and EST successful rate were retrospectively reviewed between two groups.Results ① The important chronic concomitant diseases were significantly higher in group A than those in group B ( 29.3 % vs 8.1 % ,P＜0.01).② The EST successful rate in group A and B was 95.6% and 96.5%,respectively ( P＞0.05).③ Sixteen patients in group A had complications including 13 caused by EST itself,3 related with EST and one died of aspiration pneumonia.While in group B,41 complications were caused by EST itself and no EST related complications.There was a statistically difference in EST related complications between two groups (P < 0.01 ).In complications caused by EST itself,there was no difference between two groups (P 0.05 ).④ The average hospital stay was ( 7.2 ± 2.2) days in group A and (5.1 ± 1.4) days in group B with no significant difference (P 0.05),Conclusion The EST is safe and effective in treatment of patients over 80 years.