Nurses' Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs and Competencies, and Organizational Supports / 임상간호연구

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess nurses' evidence-based practice (EBP) beliefs and competencies, and organizational supports to develop EBP. METHODS: A descriptive study was conducted using a survey of clinical nurses at a tertiary hospital in South Korea. RESULTS: The survey was distributed to a total of 1,413 nurses and was completed by 1,318 nurses. There were significant differences in the EBP beliefs and competencies, and the perception of organizational supports among nurses at different educational levels. The EBP beliefs, EBP competencies, and organizational supports had a positive correlation with each other. EBP competencies were the highest in nurses with less than 3-years of clinical experience, and the perception of organization supports were the highest in nurses with more than 10-years of clinical experience. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that educational programs, training, and organizational supports are recommended for facilitating successful EBP among nurses.

Expert's opinions on the National Oral Health Examination evaluation system / 대한구강보건학회지

OBJECTIVES: The Delphi study was performed in Korea to develop a consensus opinion for the quality improvement in National oral health examination, and to obtain a basic data on how to improve the evaluation system of the National health examination. METHODS: Consensus was developed through two rounds of assessment in September and October, 2011. Seven professors and six dentists, recommended by Korean Dental Associations, were chosen as the Delphi experts. The Delphi questionnaire collected data in the following categories; management of facilities, preparation before oral screening, notice, certification of human resource, preservation of oral screening sheets, charge for oral screening, notification of agreement with using oral screening data, and the notification of oral screening results. To develop new criteria, the additional delphi questionnaire collected data in the following categories; human resource for dental screening, relevancy of instruments and facilities, a dental screening process. Respondents were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the questionnaire statements on a scale from 0 to 9 (0 indicating total disagreement and 9 indicating total agreement). The mean, coefficient of variation, median and agreement level were calculated. Agreement level was calculated by the proportion of respondents who chose more than 7. Consensus was considered to be defined when the agreement level was more than 45% in each section. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved in every criterion except for management of facilities, charge for oral screening and notification of agreement with using oral screening data. In new criteria, consensus was achieved in every criterion except for human resource for dental screening. CONCLUSIONS: Experts for the National Oral Health Examination in Korea achieved a consensus on certain aspects of the evaluation system of the National Oral Health Examination. It is needed to consider an improvement of the evaluation criteria on the National Oral Health Examination program.