A Case of Cardiac Lymphangioma Presenting as a Cystic Mass in the Right Atrium

A 44-year-old woman underwent surgery for an asymptomatic primary tumor of the heart located in the right atrium. The tumor was detected incidentally during follow-up computed tomography for a resected breast cancer. The mass, lying along the lower portion of the right atrial septum, was homogenous and cystic in nature, as detected by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Complete resection was performed via a median sternotomy under cardiopulmonary bypass. The postoperative course was uneventful. However, the histological result was surprising: the mass was a cardiac lymphangioma.

Trans-radial Coronary Stenting in two hospital : Comparison with Trans-femoral Approach

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The transradial approach for coronary intervention has a lower incidence of access site complications and can increase patient comfort after percutaneus tansluminal coronary angioplasty(PTCA). The purpose of this study is to compare procedural success and complication rates of percutaneous transradial coronary stenting which was performed by four operators in two hospitals with those using transfemoral approach. MATERIALS AND METHOD: From September 1998 to July 1999, one hundred seventy five consecutive patients(201 lesions) treated with coronary stent implantation were enrolled for this study : 84 patients underwent transradial coronary stenting(Radial Group), and 91 patients transfemoral coronary stenting(Femoral Group). RESULTS: Seven patients who failed coronary cannulation via radial artery were crossed over to the Femoral Group. The measurements of the radial artery were not done. Patient demographics were similar in both groups. Procedural success was similar in both group(95.2% in Radial Group vs. 97.8% in Femoral Group, p=S). All transradial coronary stenting were possible using conventional guiding catheters which are used in transfemoral intervention. Local vascular complication rates showed a trend toward a reduction in the Radial Group(2.4% vs. 8.8%, p=.06). CONCLUSION: This study showed the similarity in the safety and efficacy of transradial coronary stenting compared to those of transfemoral approach.