RESUMO
Objective@#Cardiac tamponade with hemodynamic collapse requires immediate treatment, and ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis is the treatment of choice. Although an essential skill for emergency physicians, there is a lack of training. We created a phantom that could practice ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis using readily available materials. The pros and cons of the materials used were then compared. @*Methods@#Cardiac tamponade phantoms were made from gelatin, and included a heart, liver, and rib cage. We conducted a model-specific satisfaction questionnaire targeting 15 emergency physicians. The questionnaire was designed to be answered on a Likert 5-point scale. @*Results@#Creating the gelatin model took 6 hours. At room temperature, the gelatin model was able to retain its shape for 3 days. Fifteen physicians participated in the questionnaire, comprising five subjects having actual pericardiocentesis experience. In the questionnaire, our model achieved high satisfaction with all questions. @*Conclusion@#In our study, the pericardiocentesis phantom made from gelatin could maintain its shape for a long time, there was better recognition of the needle tip, and the model was more similar to the actual cardiac tamponade situation. Considering these positive characteristics, we recommend the phantom as a model for pericardiocentesis training.
RESUMO
Background@#Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an essential tool in emergency medicine (EM). We aimed to investigate the current status and perception of POCUS use in emergency medical centers in Korea. @*Methods@#A cross-sectional, nationwide survey was conducted using a mobile survey of physicians at emergency medical centers in Korea. The first message was sent on November 27, 2020, and the second message was sent on December 3, 2020 to the non-responders.The questionnaire comprised 6 categories and 24 questionnaires on demographics, current practice, education, perception, and barriers to the use of POCUS. @*Results@#A total of 467 physicians participated in the survey (a response rate of 32% among 1,458 target physicians), of which 43% were residents and 57% were EM specialists. Most of the respondents (96%) answered that they use POCUS, of which 89% reported using it at least once a week. The most frequently used types of POCUS were focused assessment with sonography for trauma (68%) and echocardiography (66%). Musculoskeletal, male genital, and pediatric scans were rarely performed tests but ranked as of the scans physicians most wanted to learn. About 73% of the respondents received ultrasound education, and 41% received ultrasound education at their own institutions. Nevertheless, educationrelated barriers are still the biggest deterrent to POCUS use (60%). In addition, multivariate multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that the greater the number of ultrasound devices and the total number of physicians in the emergency center, the more likely they were to use POCUS every day. @*Conclusion@#This study found that most physicians currently working in emergency medical centers in Korea more frequently perform various types of ultrasound scans compared to those 10 years prior. To further promote the use of POCUS, it is important to have an appropriate number of ultrasound devices and physicians in the emergency center along with systematic POCUS education.
RESUMO
Background@#Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an essential tool in emergency medicine (EM). We aimed to investigate the current status and perception of POCUS use in emergency medical centers in Korea. @*Methods@#A cross-sectional, nationwide survey was conducted using a mobile survey of physicians at emergency medical centers in Korea. The first message was sent on November 27, 2020, and the second message was sent on December 3, 2020 to the non-responders.The questionnaire comprised 6 categories and 24 questionnaires on demographics, current practice, education, perception, and barriers to the use of POCUS. @*Results@#A total of 467 physicians participated in the survey (a response rate of 32% among 1,458 target physicians), of which 43% were residents and 57% were EM specialists. Most of the respondents (96%) answered that they use POCUS, of which 89% reported using it at least once a week. The most frequently used types of POCUS were focused assessment with sonography for trauma (68%) and echocardiography (66%). Musculoskeletal, male genital, and pediatric scans were rarely performed tests but ranked as of the scans physicians most wanted to learn. About 73% of the respondents received ultrasound education, and 41% received ultrasound education at their own institutions. Nevertheless, educationrelated barriers are still the biggest deterrent to POCUS use (60%). In addition, multivariate multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that the greater the number of ultrasound devices and the total number of physicians in the emergency center, the more likely they were to use POCUS every day. @*Conclusion@#This study found that most physicians currently working in emergency medical centers in Korea more frequently perform various types of ultrasound scans compared to those 10 years prior. To further promote the use of POCUS, it is important to have an appropriate number of ultrasound devices and physicians in the emergency center along with systematic POCUS education.