Changes in electrocardiographic parameters in children with complete left bundle branch block early after transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect / 中国当代儿科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To observe the changes in electrocardiographic parameters in children with complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) after the transcatheter closure of simple ventricular septal defect (VSD).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 21 children with CLBBB early after transcatheter closure of perimembranous VSD were recruited. Another 21 children without any type of arrhythmia after transcatheter closure of perimembranous VSD were enrolled as the control group. The sex, age, and the size of occluder were matched between the two groups. The changes in the following indices were compared between the two groups: left ventricular voltage, QT interval, corrected QT interval (QTc), QT dispersion (QTd), corrected QT dispersion (QTcd), JT dispersion (JTd), and corrected JT dispersion (JTcd) on the electrocardiogram before transcatheter closure and at 1, 3, 5, 30 days after transcatheter closure.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Left ventricular voltage and JTcd changed with operation time in the CLBBB and control groups (P<0.05). There were interaction effects between time and grouping in the changes in left ventricular voltage and QTd (P<0.05). There was a significant difference in JTcd between the CLBBB and control groups (P<0.05). There was also a significant difference in left ventricular voltage between the CLBBB and control groups at 3 and 5 days after the transcatheter closure (P<0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>There are significant differences in electrocardiographic left ventricular voltage and JTcd between VSD children with and without CLBBB early after transcatheter closure. JTcd might be useful in predicting the development of CLBBB early after transcatheter closure of VSD.</p>

Correlation of the inner diameter parameters of the spermatic vein in different positions and states of the varicocele patient with the results of seminal examination / 中华男科学杂志

<p><b>Objective</b>To study the correlation of the inner diameter parameters of the spermatic vein in different positions and states of the varicocele (VC) patient with the results of seminal examination.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 149 VC patients underwent ultrasonography, routine semen examination, and sperm morphological analysis. The parameters obtained from ultrasonography included the bilateral testis volume in a supine position, the largest spermatic vein diameter in a supine position at rest (DSR), the largest spermatic vein diameter in a supine position following Valsalva manoeuvre (DSV), the largest spermatic vein diameter in an upright position at rest (DUR), and the largest spermatic vein diameter in an upright position following Valsalva manoeuvre (DUV). Then we calculated the parameters △DS=DSV－DSR, △DU=DUV－DUR, △DR=DUR－DSR, and △DV=DUV－DSV and analyzed the correlation of the above parameters with the results of semen examination using the ROC curve.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Based on the results of semen examination, 119 (79.87%) of the patients were allocated to the abnormal group and the other 30 (20.13%) to the normal group. Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in △DU (P=0.007), △DR (P=0.0001), and △DV (P=0.04), but not in DSR (P=0.35), DSV (P=0.34), DUR (P=0.06), DUV (P=0.12), and △DS (P=0.64), nor in the volume of the testis affected (P=0.323). The area under the ROC curve was 0.55 for DSR, 0.57 for DSV, 0.64 for DUR, 0.62 for DUV, 0.49 for △DS, 0.28 for △DU, 0.86 for △DR, and 0.69 for △DV. The corresponding cutoff values were 2.25, 2.51, 2.48, 2.63, 0.30, 0.23, 0.25, and 0.20, the corresponding sensitivities of semen detection were 50.42%, 65.55%, 60.50%, 60.50%, 49.90%, 29.41%, 79.83%, and 65.55%, and the corresponding specificities were 56.67%, 63.33%, 63.33%, 63.33%, 56.67%, 33.33%, 80%, and 63.33%, respectively.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The difference between the largest spermatic vein diameters in supine and upright positions at rest provides a high diagnostic accuracy for semen detection and helps to predict abnormality in seminal examination for VC patients.</p>