RESUMO
BACKGROUND:Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) are known as important factors, which mediate a variety of functions in terms of vascular homeostasis, inflammation and tissue repair. However, their role in systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) has been less well studied. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the abnormalities of fibrinolysis and degradation of extracellular matrix mediated by uPA and uPAR are directly related to the patients with SIRS. We therefore analyzed their role and clinicopathological significance in patients with SIRS.METHODS:A case-control study was conducted with 85 patients who were divided into two groups according to the diagnostic criteria of SIRS:SIRS group (n=50) and non-SIRS group (n=35). The SIRS group was divided into MODS group (n=26) and non-MODS group (n=24) by their severity, and survival group (n=35) and non-survival group (n=15) by their prognosis. Another 30 healthy adults served as normal controls. uPA and uPAR in plasma were detected by commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits.RESULTS:The plasma level of uPA was lower in the SIRS group than in the non-SIRS group and controls (P<0.001 andP<0.001). It was lower in sepsis patients and the MODS group than in the non-sepsis patients and the non-MODS patients (allP<0.05). However, there was no difference in uPA level between survivors and non-survivors (P>0.05). The plasma level of uPAR increased in the SIRS group compared with the non-SIRS group and controls (P<0.001 andP<0.001). There was a significant elevation of uPAR in sepsis patients, MODS patients and non-survivors as compared with non-sepsis patients, non-MODS patients and survivors respectively (allP<0.05). Plasma uPAR levels were positively correlated with APACHE II score (r=0.575,P<0.001) and SOFA score (r=0.349,P=0.013). AUCs for the prediction of SIRS mortality were 0.67 and 0.51, respectively, for uPA and uPAR.CONCLUSION:uPAR could be a predictor of poor outcome in patients with SIRS.
RESUMO
<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Central venous pressure (CVP) and intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI) were used to assess the fluid status. It has previously been shown that CVP is not as accurate as ITBVI for all the shock patients. We therefore hypothesized that the change of CVP has the ability to predict fluid responsiveness in some clinical cases of shock.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From September 1st 2009 to September 1st 2011, sixty-three patients with shock from different Intensive Care Unit (ICU) were collected into this retrospective study. All the patients received fluid challenge strategy (infusing 300 ml hydroxyethyl starch in 20 minutes), were monitored with CVP and pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output (PICCO). The correlation between changes in cardiac index (ΔCI), CVP (ΔCVP) and ITBVI (ΔITBVI) were analyzed. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in CI ≥ 10%. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for ΔCVP and ΔITBVI.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>For all the patients, there was no correlation between ΔCI and ΔCVP (P = 0.073), but in the subgroup analysis, the correlation between ΔCI and ΔCVP was significant in those younger than 60 years old (P = 0.018) and those with hypovolemic shock (P = 0.001). The difference of areas under the ROC curves of ΔCVP and ΔITBVI were not statistically significant in the group younger than 60 years old or hypovolemic shock group (P > 0.05, respectively). However, no similar results can be found in the group older than 60 years old and the other two shock type groups from ROC curves of ΔCVP and ΔITBVI.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>ΔCVP is not suitable for evaluating the volume status of the shock patients with fluid resuscitation regardless of their condition. However, in some ways, ΔCVP have the ability to predict fluid responsiveness in the younger shock patients or in the hypovolemic shock patients.</p>
Assuntos
Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pressão Venosa Central , Fisiologia , Hidratação , Métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Choque , TerapêuticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the plasma levels of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), D-dimer, IL-6 and TNF-α, and observe the relations among uPA, uPAR, D-dimer, IL-6 and TNF-α in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). METHODS: A prospective, clinical case-control study was conducted in patients with SIRS at age of more than 55 years old treated during 2008-2010 at Wuhan Central Hospital. Venous blood samples were collected by routine venipuncture. Eighty-five patients were divided into two groups according to diagnostic criteria of SIRS: SIRS patients from intensive care units (n=50), and non-SIRS patients from medical wards (n=35). Thirty healthy blood donors who visited the General Health Check-up Division at Wuhan Central Hospital served as controls. Excluded from the study were (1) those patients with pregnancy; (2) those with cancer; (3) those died after admission into the ICU in 7 days; (4) those received cardiopulmonary resuscitation; (5) those who had previous blood system diseases; and (6) those with SIRS before admission into the ICU. The levels of uPA, uPAR, D-D, IL-6 and TNF-α in blood were detected by commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 17.0 and expressed as mean ± standard. Student's t test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used in the analysis. The relations of uPA, uPAR and D-dimer, IL-6 TNF-α levels were analyzed using Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient test. RESULTS: The plasma levels of uPA , uPAR, D-dimer,IL-6 and TNF-α in the patients with SIRS were obviously higher than those in the non-SIRS patients and controls (P<0.001). Correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between uPAR and IL-6 levels (r=0.395, P=0.004) and between uPAR and TNF-α levels (r=0.606, P<0.001), but no correlation between uPAR and D-dimer levels (r=0.069, P=0.632). No correlation was observed between uPA, D-dimer, IL-6 and TNF-α levels (P>0.05). The establishment of ROC curve was based on the levels of uPAR, D-dimer, IL-6 and TNF-αin 24 hours for the diagnosis of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), and the ROC areas under the curve were 0.76, 0.58, 0.86 and 0.83, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: uPA and uPAR play a major role in patients with SIRS in the process of coagulation disorder, but the mechanism of SIRS is not the same. uPAR may play a central role in the development of SIRS to MODS.