Reliability and Validity of the Subjective Well-being Scale of Chinese Middle School Students / 中国心理卫生杂志

Objective : To set up the subjective well-being scale for Chinese middle school students. Methods: 1404 middle school students from 11 middle schools in Shenzhen finished the middle school students subjective well-being scale. Results : The result of Item Analysis showed that 20 items of the scale met psychometric criteria. The scale's internal consistency was 0.897, split reliability 0.827. It had acceptable discriminant validity: subjects with higher scale scores also had significantly higher scores in every items than those with lower scale scores, and this scale could effectively differentiate students with high and low school achievements. Exploratory factor analyses indicated that the scale had one dominant factor. Conclusion : The Chinese middle school students subjective well-being scale has met basic psychometric criteria for further research.

Moderating Effect of Self-efficacy on the Relationship Between Neuroticism and Test Anxiety / 中国临床心理学杂志

Objective:To explore the relationship amongst neuroticism,self-efficacy and test anxiety,and the moderating effect of self-efficacy.Methods:581 middle school students were assessed with neuroticism-related items from Big Five Adjective Scale,Schwarzer General Self-efficacy Scale(GSES) and Cognitive Test Anxiety Scale(CTAS).Results:①Test anxiety was negatively correlated with self-efficacy(r=-0.37,P

Reliability and Vaiidatioa of the Social Comparison Orientation Scale / 中国心理卫生杂志

Objective: To revise the Chinese version of the Social Comparison Orientation Scale. Methods: The questionnaire was administered to two samples with total of 1023 individuals. Results: The item analysis showed that all of the 11 items met psychometric criteria. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the Chinese version of Social Comparison Scale was composed of two dimensions, which were ability and concept, which can explained 55. 6% of total variance. The internal consistency reliability was 0. 88 and the four weeks tesl-retest reliability coefficient was 0. 89. The further analysis revealed that the male sample had significantly lower scores than female sample (39. 4 ? 8. 7/41. 4 ?7. 3, t= -4. 06), and the employee sample had significantly lower scores than student sample (39. 5 ? 8. 6/41. 3 ?7. 5, t = -3. 98, P

Reliability and Validation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale / 中国心理卫生杂志

Objective : To revise the general self-efficacy scale. Methods : 3094 subjects from 7 different cities in China finished the general self-efficacy scale. Results : The result of Item Analysis showed that 19 of the scale met psychometric criteria. The scale's internal consistency was 0.81, split reliability 0.81. It had acceptable discriminant validity: subjects with higher scale scores also had significantly higher scores in every items than those with lower scale scores, and this scale could effectively differentiate the high and low level managers, it also could effectively differentiate the managers groug and workers group. Exploratory factor analyses indicated that the scale had one dominant factor. Conclusion : The general self-efficacy scale has sound psychometric properties for further research.