In vitro chemosensitivity profile of oral squamous cell cancer and its correlation with clinical response to chemotherapy.

CONTEXT: Oral cancers represent a disparate group of tumors with diverse clinical behavior and chemosensitivity profile. Currently, it is difficult to predict whether a tumor will respond to chemotherapy and which drug(s) will achieve the maximum clinical response. AIMS: To study in vitro chemosensitivity profile of oral cancers and to correlate the in vitro chemosensitivity of oral cancer to clinical response to chemotherapy. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective study in a tertiary cancer care center. METHODS AND MATERIAL: We prospectively studied the chemosensitivity profile of 57 untreated, advanced, unresectable oral cancers to cisplatin, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil and their combinations by using histoculture drug response assay (HDRA) and correlated them to the clinical response to chemotherapy. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Chi Square test. RESULTS: Biopsy samples were successfully histocultured in 52/57 (91%) cases. Of these 52 evaluable patients, 47 had primary gingivo-buccal cancers and five had tongue / floor of mouth cancers. Based on the assay, 27 (52%) tumors were sensitive to cisplatin, 27 (52%) to methotrexate, 24 (46%) to 5-fluorouracil, 38 (73%) to combination of cisplatin and methotrexate and 36 (69%) to combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Of these, 31 patients with good performance status received two cycles of chemotherapy using one or more of these test drugs. There was a significant correlation (p=0.03) between the in vitro chemosensitivity and the clinical response. Negative predictive value of the test was 80%, positive predictive value-69%, sensitivity-79% and specificity -71%. The overall accuracy of the assay was 74%. CONCLUSIONS: We found HDRA to be a fairly good predictor of chemo-response of oral cancer.

Chloramphenicol: screening and review to evaluate its potential beneficial effects in leukaemia.

Chloramphenicol is an antimicrobial agent having a very broad-spectrum of activity including Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobes. However the use of chloramphenicol has reduced over a period of time due to the adverse effects of causing bone marrow depression or in some cases severe aplastic anaemia. As the effects are seen on the bone marrow cell, it was intended to find out if these adverse effects could be used for the benefits in leukaemia patients, using in-vitro study on leukaemic cell lines. The study showed inhibition of growth of the leukaemia cells by chloramphenicol which was comparable to or better than daunorubicin in some cell lines. The article also discusses the other adverse effect profile of chloramphenicol compared with anticancer drugs and its potential benefit in leukaemia and in neutropenic fever.