Management protocol for acute gastrointestinal bleeding.

Gastro-intestinal haemorrhage is not uncommon and is manifested as haematemesis, melaena or haematochezia. The first step is to resuscitate the patient if necessary and then proceed to make a diagnosis as well as divide patients into high and low-risk groups after taking a good history and performing a physical examination especially to detect the presence of an enlarged spleen. Then one should proceed with an endoscopy and other investigations chosen carefully for their usefulness. Control of bleeding is then tailored to the diagnosis and is usually with drugs, endoscopy, angio-embolisation and surgery in that order. The mortality rate for upper GI bleeding varies from 10 to 30% depending on the proportion of patients with variceal haemorrhage included. For lower GI bleeding mortality is in the region of 20% and for obscure GI bleeding outpatient mortality is 12%. The main points to remember are that the management of these patients in India should be different from those described in Western textbooks and suited to their specific needs and the facilities available locally. However, in spite of the widespread lack of complex diagnostic techniques and a shortage of blood for transfusion we believe that by adopting an aggressive step-by-step approach tailored to our own environment we will be able to save most of our patients who are usually young and have few comorbid conditions.

Complicated colonic diverticulosis: surgical perspective from an Indian Centre.

INTRODUCTION: Colonic diverticulosis was previously uncommon in India but its incidence seems to have increased recently. Patients with the disease in developing countries are also underdiagnosed and are therefore more likely to present with complications needing operation. However there is a paucity of surgical data on the condition. METHOD: Between August 1996 and February 2005 we operated on 32 patients (28 males, 4 females mean age 60 years) with colonic diverticulosis and analysed their characteristics from a prospective database. We here with describe our experience. RESULTS: Operations for diverticular disease constituted 3% of all the colorectal operations we performed. The diverticula were in the sigmoid colon in 28 (88%) and also in the descending colon in 4 (12%). Twenty-four patients were symptomatic. Twenty-two patients were diagnosed before surgery, 8 at operation and the rest from resected specimens. Emergency operations were performed in 23 and elective procedures in 9 patients. Ten patients were operated on for perforation and abscess, 8 for obstruction, 8 for colovesical fistula, 3 for peritonitis and 3 for haemorrhage. Emergency procedures were performed in 2 stages (resection plus a proximal diversion) in 20; unless done for bleeding in a stable patient where a primary anastomosis was done. One patient who had had an emergency procedure died of sepsis and ketoacidosis in the post-operative period. The 8 patients with colovesical fistulae were all males, had only sigmoid involvement and had had symptoms for a longer duration than the 24 without fistulae. CONCLUSIONS: Although operations for colonic diverticulosis still form a small proportion of the total number of colorectal operations, the diagnosis is often delayed till complications ensue and thus patients usually require emergency procedures. Males with long standing symptoms and sigmoid diverticula may develop colovesical fistulae.