Predicting Factors of Nonsentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictors of nonsentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastasis in breast cancer and to evaluate the usefulness of the scoring systems and nomograms. METHODS: In this analysis, we reviewed the clinicopathologic features of 70 patients who had undergone sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy and axillary lymph node dissection. The clinical features of patients, histologic parameters and hormonal receptor status of primary tumor and histopathologic features of SLN metastasis were noted retrospectively. Furthermore, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to assess the discriminative power of the scoring systems and nomograms. RESULTS: The metastatic tumor size in SLN (P<0.001), extracapsular invasion (P=0.002), percentage of positive SLNs among the removed SLNs (P=0.011), primary tumor size (P=0.038) were associated significantly with NSLN metastasis, statistically, in univariate analysis. Based on multivariate logistic regression, the metastatic tumor size was the only prognostic factor of NSLN metastasis (P=0.012). The AUC of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center scoring system was greater than other systems, significantly (P=0.004). CONCLUSION: We have shown in this study that it would be possible to predict NSLN status based on the metastatic tumor size in SLN. Although the significance was not achieved in multivariate analysis, the size of primary tumor, extracapsular invasion of metastasis in SLN, percentage of positive SLNs among the removed SLNs had the potential to be a predictive factor of NSLN metastasis. MSKCC scoring system appears to be more effective and accurate than other scoring systems for selecting patients for whom axillary lymph node dissection can be avoided.

Comparison of Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy with Open Adrenalectomy for Adrenal Tumor / 대한내시경복강경외과학회지

PURPOSE: The definite indications of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) and the limitations of minimally invasive surgery have yet to be determined. To verify the benefit and safety of LA, we compared the results of LA with those of open adrenalectomy (OA) and we further analyzed the clinical results of LA in accordance with the time period of performing this surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 69 patients who received adrenalectomy between 1997 and 2008. We compared LA with OA. The LA was divided into subsets of the early and late groups, and the transperitoneal approach and retroperitoneal approach groups, and we compared and analyzed the results of each group, along with the results of the OA and LA groups. For each of the groups, we analyzed the following factors; age, gender, tumor size, tumor location, the operative time, the time under anesthesia, the amounts of blood loss and transfusion, the time to first oral intake, the length of the postoperative hospital stay and the complications. RESULTS: LA (25 cases), as compared to OA (20 cases), showed better results for the amount of transfusion, the time to first oral intake, the length of the postoperative hospital stay and the complication rates (p=0.032; p=0.017; p=0.02). As for CA (4 cases), the time to first oral intake and the length of the postoperative hospital stay were significantly longer than that of LA (p=0.001; p=0.021). LA done in the late period demonstrated less blood loss and a shorter time to first oral intake as compared to the LA of the early period (p=0.032; p=0.019). There were no significant statistical differences between the results of the peritoneal or retroperitoneal approaches. CONCLUSION: LA has the merits of a shortening hospital stay and decreased complication. Furthermore, as the experience with this type of surgery accumulates, these merits are likely to become stronger. Thus, surgeons are expected to carefully decide on choosing the surgical methods by fully understanding the benefits and indications of LA.

Analysis of Prognostic Factors after Surgery for Gallbladder Cancer

PURPOSE: Gallbladder cancer, which is the most common malignancy of the biliary tract, is frequently associated with poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes with gallbladder cancer according to the surgical treatment, pathologic stage, and prognostic factors. METHOD: The medical records of 52 consecutive patients with gallbladder cancer treated at our institution from June 1996 through June 2005 were reviewed retrospectively. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method (mean followed period 60 months) and the log-rank test. Prognostic factors were analyzed using Cox regression. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 67 years. Fiftysix percent of patients were female. Twentyeight patients (56%) underwent curative resection (5 simple cholecystectomies and 23 radical cholecystectomies). There were no procedure-related deaths. The Overall 5-year survival was 18%. Patients who underwent curative resection had a higher 5-year survival rate (40%) than patients who underwent palliative surgery (0%; P=0.0001). The palliative surgery, high T stage, positive lymph node metastasis were significant factors predictive of worse survivial. CONCLUSION: The good long-term survival may be achieved by an early diagnosis and radical resection.