Research status of psychosocial effects and interventions in cancer anorexia/cachexia syndrome patients / 中国实用护理杂志

Cancer anorexia/cachexia syndrome (cancer anorexia cachexia syndrome, CACS) is a common complication in advanced cancer patients, which is characterized by reduced feeding, sustained weight loss, general fatigue and weakness. CACS related symptoms make patients suffer from a series of adverse psychosocial effects, such as anxiety, pain and social isolation, thus bringing serious adverse effects on patients′ individuals, families and society. This paper reviewed the symptoms associated with CACS and their psychosocial effects, as well as the interventions related to adverse psychosocial effects, in order to provide theoretical reference for alleviating psychosocial distress and improving health-related quality of life of patients with CACS.

Effects of patient participation -based dietary intervention on nutritional status for patients with severe burns / 中国实用护理杂志

Objective:To explore the influence of patient participation-based dietary intervention on nutritional status for patients with severe burn.Methods:From September 2017 to January 2019, 60 severe burn patients hospitalized in the department of burn and plastic surgery of Qingdao Municipal Hospital were recruited and divided into the experimental group ( n=30) and the control group ( n=30) according to the random number table method. The control group received a regular diet. While the experimental group received a patient participation-based dietary intervention(PPDI), The wound healing time and the value of nutritional status index, such as height, body mass index(BMI), serum albumin, serum prealbumin, in the two groups on admission, at 2 weeks after intervention, 4 weeks after intervention were compared. The nutritional knowledge questionnaire of burn patients and "3-day diet diary" were used for investigation. Results:The score of nutritional knowledge showed no significant difference between the two groups before intervention. After intervention, the score of nutritional knowledge in the experimental group was 21.40±2.42, significantly higher than that in the control group (19.00±2.26) ( t value was 3.975, P<0.01). For time effect and between-group effect, there were significant difference in serum albumin between two groups ( F values were 9.232, 4.651, P<0.05); the time effect and between-group effect of serum prealbumin were statistically significant ( F values were 11.592, 6.228, P < 0.05). The wound healing time in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group ( t value was -3.801, P<0.01). Conclusions:Patient participation-based dietary intervention can effectively enhanced the level of nutritional knowledge, improved nutritional status, shortened wound healing time among patients with severe burn.

Progress on surgical treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis / 中国骨伤

Isthmic spondylolisthesis is a common degenerative disease of the spine and seriously affects people's quality of life. At present, surgical indications for lumbar spondylolisthesis have basically reached consensus. The surgical plan for the disease is mainly isthmus repair, decompression of spinal canal, reduction of spondylolisthesis, and spinal fusion. The principle of treatment is mainly to relieve nerve compression and restore spinal stability, but for each the specific method and degree of implementation of the link still remains controversial. Open surgery can complete decompression, reduction and fusion of severe spondylolisthesis, and rebuild the stability of the spine. However, the surgical trauma is too large. Minimally invasive surgery can reduce the damage of paravertebral soft tissue, reduce intraoperative blood loss, shorten the time of hospitalization and rehabilitation, and reduce the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications. Therefore, in recent years, more and more clinicians praise it, but the treatment of severe spondylolisthesis lumbar spondylolisthesis is not effective. This article reviews recent advances in surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Comparison of the effectiveness of vertebral arch replantation and laminectomy in the treatment of mild to moderate isthmic spondylolisthesis / 中国修复重建外科杂志

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of vertebral arch replantation and laminectomy in the treatment of mild to moderate isthmic spondylolisthesis. Methods: The clinical data of 66 patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis treated with vertebral arch replantation or laminectomy between March 2014 and July 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into trial group (34 cases, treated with complete replantation of vertebral arch, intervertebral fusion, and internal fixation) and control group (32 cases, treated with laminectomy with intervertebral fusion and internal fixation) according to different surgical methods. There was no significant difference in general data of gender, age, disease duration, lesion segment, Meyerding grade, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, vertebral arch fusion of trial group, and epidural scar formation of the two groups were recorded. The VAS score, JOA score, and ODI score were evaluated at preoperation, 3, 6, 12 months after operation, and at last follow-up. The effectiveness was evaluated according to HOU Shuxun's criteria. Results: All the patients successfully completed the surgery, without any aggravation of nerve injury, dural tear, infection, etc. There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups ( t=0.583, P=0.562), but the intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the trial group than that in the control group ( t=2.134, P=0.037). All the 66 patients were followed up 13-18 months (mean, 16.2 months). Postoperative clinical symptoms of all patients were significantly improved. In the control group, 7 cases were found to have symptoms of spinal canal stenosis with postoperative posture changes at 3 months after operation, and 5 cases showed mild lower limb numbness at 18 months after operation. No complication such as infection and nerve injury occurred in other patients. In the trial group, 34 cases of epidural scar tissue were completely blocked outside the replantation vertebral arch, while in the control group, 11 cases of epidural scar tissue invaded the spinal canal. At last follow-up, the fusion rate of intervertebral bone grafting and vertebral arch replantation in the trial group was 100%, and the fusion rate of intervertebral bone grafting in the control group was also 100%. The VAS score, ODI score, and JOA score were significantly improved at each time point after operation ( P0.05). According to HOU Shuxun's criteria, the excellent and good rate was 91.2% in the trial group and 84.4% in the control group, showing no significant difference ( χ2=1.092, P=0.573). Conclusion: Compared with laminectomy, vertebral arch replantation can better improve postoperative neurological symptoms, maximize the reconstruction of the bone spinal canal, restore the stability of the intraspinal environment, and it is a better surgical method for lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis.