Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore ; : 400-411, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-312257

RESUMO

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>Up to 30% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) respond inadequately to conventional non-biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs), and may benefit from therapy with biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs). However, the high cost of bDMARDs limits their widespread use. The Chapter of Rheumatologists, College of Physicians, Academy of Medicine, Singapore aims to define clinical eligibility for government-assisted funding of bDMARDs for local RA patients.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>Evidence synthesis was performed by reviewing 7 published guidelines on use of biologics for RA. Using the modified RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM), rheumatologists rated indications for therapies for different clinical scenarios. Points reflecting the output from the formal group consensus were used to formulate the practice recommendations.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Ten recommendations including diagnosis of RA, choice of disease activity measure, initiation and continuation of bDMARD and option of first and second-line therapies were formulated. The panellists agreed that a bDMARD is indicated if a patient has (1) active RA with a Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) score of ≥3.2, (2) a minimum of 6 swollen and tender joints, and (3) has failed a minimum of 2 nbDMARD combinations of adequate dose regimen for at least 3 months each. To qualify for continued biologic therapy, a patient must have (1) documentation of DAS28 every 3 months and (2) at least a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) moderate response by 6 months after commencement of therapy.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The recommendations developed by a formal group consensus method may be useful for clinical practice and guiding funding decisions by relevant authorities in making bDMARDs usage accessible and equitable to eligible patients in Singapore.</p>


Assuntos
Humanos , Antirreumáticos , Economia , Usos Terapêuticos , Artrite Reumatoide , Tratamento Farmacológico , Financiamento Governamental , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Singapura
2.
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore ; : 128-134, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-275218

RESUMO

Rheumatoid arthritis is a common and potentially devastating condition which did not have good treatment options until recently. Pharmacological treatment should not just comprise antiinflammatory agents and corticosteroids. The current therapeutic approach is to start a disease modifying agent early in the illness to prevent eventual joint damage. Older disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) include methotrexate, sulphasalazine and hydroxychloroquine. Newer ones such as leflunomide and cyclosporine are also used. A recent advance in the management of rheumatoid arthritis is the use of biological agents which block certain key molecules involved in the pathogenesis of the illness. They include tumour necrosis factor (TNF)- blocking agents such as infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab, the anti-CD 20 agent rituximab and CTLA-4 Ig abatacept. Other agents which are in development include anti-IL6 tocilizumab, anti-CD22 and anti-lymphostat B. In this review, the efficacy and side effects of these agents, their impact on current clinical practice and future trends are discussed.


Assuntos
Humanos , Abatacepte , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Usos Terapêuticos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Antirreumáticos , Usos Terapêuticos , Artrite Reumatoide , Alergia e Imunologia , Terapêutica , Quimioterapia Combinada , Imunoconjugados , Usos Terapêuticos , Fatores Imunológicos , Usos Terapêuticos , Imunossupressores , Usos Terapêuticos , Metotrexato , Usos Terapêuticos , Indução de Remissão , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA