Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health ; 2005 May; 36(3): 641-3
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-33803

RESUMO

Three hundred thirty-six stool samples from October 2001 through October 2002 were analyzed for the presence of intestinal parasites. Fifty-six of these (16.7%) were positive for a total of 66 parasites; 65/66 (98.5%) were detected by iodine and dimethyl sulfoxide-modified acid-fast (DMSO-mAFB) stained smears of fresh and formalin-ethylacetate sedimentation concentrated samples. Saline, iodine, and DMSO-mAFB stained smears of fresh stool samples alone detected significantly fewer parasites, finding only 50/66 (75.8%) (p < 0.05). Stool samples analyzed by trichrome stained specimens preserved in Zinc sulfate polyvinyl alcohol (Zinc PVA) detected only 41/ 66 (62.2%) of the parasites. In our study population, it was necessary to perform the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standard (NCCLS) recommended to accurately detect intestinal parasites. The concentration technique is simple and significantly increased the detection of intestinal parasites.


Assuntos
Compostos Azo/diagnóstico , Pré-Escolar , Corantes/diagnóstico , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Dimetil Sulfóxido/diagnóstico , Amarelo de Eosina-(YS)/diagnóstico , Fezes/parasitologia , Humanos , Lactente , Intestinos/parasitologia , Iodo/diagnóstico , Verde de Metila/diagnóstico , Solventes/diagnóstico , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Tailândia , Oligoelementos/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA