Residents' Expectation of Family Medicine-Specific Training Program and Its Current State / 가정의학회지

BACKGROUND: The family medicine residency program consists mainly of clinical rotations in other specialties and the family medicine-specific training. We conducted this study to investigate how family medicine residents evaluated their training program that include family-oriented medicine, clinical preventive medicine, behavioral science and research in primary care. METHODS: In 2009, third-year residents of 129 training hospitals in Korea were surveyed to investigate the current state and their expectation of the residency program. The contents of questionnaires included training periods, conferences, procedures, interview techniques, outpatient and inpatient consultations, and written thesis. RESULTS: Total 133 out of 142 residents (93.7%) responded that 3 years of training is ideal or pertinent. Residents responded that the types of conference that they need most are journal review (81%), staff lecture (73.2%), and clinical topic review (73.2%), in that order. Procedures and interview techniques that the residents want to learn most were gastroscopy (72.5%), abdominal ultrasonography (65.2%), and pain management (46.4%). Hospitals where family medicine residents do not see hospitalized patients or patients in the outpatient clinic were 7.9% and 6.5%, respectively, whereas hospitals that maintain continuous family medicine outpatient clinics were only 40.8%. Education in outpatient clinic and articlewriting seminars was done less frequently in the secondary hospitals than in the tertiary hospitals. CONCLUSION: Evaluation and quality improvement of family medicine training program as well as specialty rotations should be considered in order to foster better family physicians. The efforts have to be made to minimize the difference in quality of each family medicine residency program.

Is Primary Care of Family Medicine better in Quality than that of Other Specialties?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of primary care by patient-completed questionnaire, and to investigate whether the results of the assessment were different among the specialties of doctors (especially family medicine) and according to the existence of a family doctor. METHODS: The questionnaire, which covers 7 components of primary care (accessibility, continuity, accountability, comprehensiveness, integration, sustained partnership with patients, whole person orientation), was administered to the applicants of health screening center of a university hospital, and factory workers in Cheonan, and residents living in Seoul. Statistic analysis was performed through the collected samples. RESULTS: Total of 574 subjects were analyzed. The mean score (%) of each component of the total sample was as follows; accessibility 45.8, continuity 47.8, comprehensiveness 22.5, accountability 55.5, integration 41.8, sustained partnership with patients 48.9, and whole person orientation 31.8. The mean score (%) of all components were 42.0. Doctors were classified into internists, general surgeons, family physicians, general physicians, and others. Family physicians had the best score in accessibility (P=0.01). The mean score of all components of family physicians was better than that of internists and the other specialties (P<0.05). The respondents who had a family doctor was 129 (22.5%). The mean score of each component was higher than those without a family doctor (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Family physicians are providing high quality primary care compared to internists and other specialists. Patients who have a family doctor are provided with higher quality primary care than those who do not. Especially, comprehensiveness and whole person orientation need to be improved.

A Case of Idiopathic Hypereosinophilic Syndrome Found in Periodic Health Examination

Hypereosinophilic syndrome is a rare disease characterized by marked peripheral eosinophilia and eosinophilic infiltration of many organs such as heart, lung, central nervous system, liver and spleen. This disease is defined by following criteria. First, sustained blood eosinophilia is greater than 1,500/mm3 longer than 6 months. Second, other apparent etiologies for eosinophilia must be absent, including parasitic infestation and allergic disease. Third, patients must have signs and symptoms of organ involvement. In Korea, some cases that eosinophil infiltrated lung, liver, gastrointestinal tract or skin were reported. In this report, we found a case showing myalgia, fatigue and eosinophilia in periodic health examination, and diagnosed hypereosinophilic syndrome.

The Effect of Job Stress in Jobholders on Propensity to Anxiety

BACKGROUND: In modern industrial society, the complexity and diversity of social structure has deeply influenced job stress, and thereby threatens mental health of jobholders more than ever. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effect of job stress in jobholders on propensity of anxiety. METHODS: Initially, 235 jobholders living in Cheonan, Asan or Seoul, from May to June 2003, were the subjects of this questionnaire. Only 233 jobholders were evaluated due to inadequate responses from two subjects. The questionnaire was made up of three contents: socio-demographic characteristic, Extended Karasek questionnaire for evaluation of job stress, and the Korean version of Goldberg anxiety scale for evaluation of anxiety. The data were analyzed by chi-square test and multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Univariate analysis of propensity to anxiety showed a statistical significance on age, monthly income and job characteristics. Moreover, in terms of multivariate analysis, in accordance with age, 40 to 49 (OR: 6.1), showed the highest odds ratio of propensity to anxiety, followed by 30 to 39 (OR: 5.2) and 10 to 29 (OR: 5.4). In job characteristics, high strain group (OR: 3.7) showed highest odds ratio, but neither low strain group nor active group revealed any statistical significance. In monthly income, there was no statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Job stress in jobholders and propensity to anxiety was positively associated; especially, the more stress jobholders got, the higher propensity to anxiety was.