Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of the two 20-mg quinapril hydrochloride tablet formulations in healthy Thai male volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of two 20-mg quinapril hydrochloride tablet preparations; Quinaril (The Biolab Ltd, Bangkok, Thailand) as the test and Accupril as the reference. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The present study was a single dose, randomized two-period crossover design conducted in 24 healthy volunteers under fasting conditions with a 7-day washout period. Serial plasma concentrations of quinapril and its active metabolite quinaprilat up to 24 h after dosing were determined by HPLC with UV detection. The pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by noncompartmental analysis and the ANOVA was carried out using logarithmically transformed data of the AUC and C as well as untransformed T(max). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two preparations regarding the T(max) of quinapril and quinaprilat and their median T(max) were 0.5 h and 1.4 - 1.5 h, respectively. The half-life of quinapril (1.2 h) was faster than quinaprilat (1.8-1.9 h) although the volume of distribution (Vd/F) of quinapril (1.1 L/kg) was larger than quinaprilat (0.3 L/kg), however, its clearance rate (CL/F) was faster when compared to quinaprilat (20-26 ml/min/kg vs. 1.7 ml/min/kg). The mean (90% CI) for the ratios Reference/Test of quinapril were 0.99 (0.89-1.10), 0.99 (0.90-1.09) and 1.01 (0.90-1.14), respectively for AUC(0-24), AUC(0-infinity) and C(max). Similarly, the corresponding values for quinaprilat were 0.95 (0.90-1.01), 0.95 (0.90-1.01) and 1.03 (1.00-1.07), respectively. These values were within the bioequivalence range of 0.80 - 1.25, thus, demonstrated the bioequivalence of the two preparations. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study indicated that the two quinapril HCL preparations are bioequivalent and it can be assumed that they are therapeutically equivalent and exchangeable in clinical practice.

Effect of doses on the bioavailability of phenytoin from a prompt-release and an extended-release preparation: single dose study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of doses on the bioavailability of a prompt-release and an extended-release phenytoin capsule after given as single doses. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Eight healthy male volunteers were given single oral doses of 100, 200, and 300 mg of a prompt-release preparation (Ditoin) and an extended-release phenytoin (Dilantin Kapseals) preparation in a crossover design with a two weeks washout period after an overnight fast. Serial blood samples were collected over 72 h post-dose. Plasma phenytoin concentrations were determined by HPLC and pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by non-compartmental model. RESULTS: Rate of phenytoin absorption from the prompt-release preparation was more prolonged after the 300mg dose (T(max) 4.5 h) than those of the 100- and 200-mg doses (T(max) 3.5 and 3 h, respectively). Similarly, the T(max) of the 200- and the 300-mg extended-release preparation (5.5 and 4 h) were more prolonged than the 100-mg dose (3 h). Bioequivalence analysis showed that the C(max) of all doses of the prompt-release preparation were higher than those values of the extended-release preparation with the mean C(max) ratio (90% CI) of 1.32 (1.24-1.40), 1.26 (1.14-1.40), and 1.29 (1.10-1.51) for the 100-, 200- and 300-mg doses, respectively. The extent of absorption (AUC(0-infinity)) of 100-mg phenytoin was bioequivalent between the two preparations [mean AUC ratio (90% CI) of 1.15 (1.11-1.18)], however, for higher doses, the prompt-release products produced higher bioavailability than the extended-release products [mean AUC ratio (90% CI) of 1.19 (1.07-1.33) and 1.17 (0.98-1.38), respectively for the 200- and 300-mg doses]. The difference in the bioavailability did not affect the elimination of phenytoin and their half-lives were comparable (11-13 h). CONCLUSION: The bioavailability of phenytoin from both preparations increased proportionally over the dose range of 100-300-mg, however, the bioavailability of the prompt-release preparation was higher than the corresponding doses of the extended-release product.

A bioequivalence study of the cefuroxime axetil in healthy volunteers.

The bioequivalence of 250-mg cefuroxime axetil was evaluated; Furoxime (by the Siam Bheasach Company, Thailand) as the test and Zinnat (GlaxoWellcome) as the reference. The two products were administered as a single dose according to a two-way crossover design, 1-week washout period to 12 healthy Thai male volunteers. Thereafter, serial blood samples were collected over a period of 15 hours. Plasma cefuroxime concentrations were measured by HPLC. The pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by noncompartmental analysis. Results: The Tmax [median (range, h)] of Furoxime and Zinnat were 1.5 (1.0-3.0) and 1.75 (1.0-3.5), respectively. The Tmax of Furoxime was faster than Zinnat with the mean (90% CI) of difference in Tmax of -0.5 [(-1.01)-0.01] h. Bioequivalence analysis showed that the AUC(0-infinity) and the Cmax of the two products were not significantly different. The point estimator (90% CI) for the ratio [Furoxime/Zinnat] of log transformed data of the AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were 1.03 (0.98-1.20) and 1.09 (1.02-1.24), respectively and were within the bioequivalence range of 0.80-1.25.

Bioequivalence study of generic acyclovir compared with the brand name acyclovir.

The bioequivalence study of 200-mg generic acyclovir was conducted in healthy males. The reference Zovirax and the test Zevin were administered as a single oral dose after an overnight fast in a two-period, crossover design separated by 1 week. Serial blood samples were collected over a period of 24 hours. Plasma acyclovir concentrations were determined by HPLC and the pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by non-compartmental analysis. RESULTS: The t 1/2 for the test (4.5 +/- 2.4 h) and Zoviraxl (3.9 +/- 2.6 h) were comparable. The analysis of variance was carried out and the median Tmax (1.50 h) for the test was not statistically difference from Zovirax. The mean (90% CI) of the AUC0-infinity and the Cmax ratios for (Test/reference) were 0.95 (0.83-1.09) and 0.95 (0.83-1.10), respectively. These values fell within the bioequivalence criteria of 0.80-1.25, thus it was concluded that Zevin and Zovirax were bioequivalence.