Mid-term efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic constipation / 中华胃肠外科杂志

Objective: To investigate the mid-term efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for chronic constipation. Methods: A descriptive case series study was conducted. Patients with chronic constipation were treated in Xijing Hospital of Digestive Disease from February 2013 to December 2018 were retrospectively enrolled. The types of constipation were confirmed based on colon slow transit test, anorectal manometry and defecography in Xi'an Mayinglong Coloproctological Hospital. This study has been registered in China clinical trial registry (Registration No.: ChiCTR-ROC-16008945). Case inclusion criteria: (1) constipation was diagnosed according to Rome III criteria; (2) traditional treatment, including education, diet adjustment, laxative, biofeedback treatment, failed for at least 1 year; (3) there were no constipation-related organic diseases. After excluding neurogenic diseases, including spinal cord injury and multiple sclerosis, 21 patients were included in this study. There were 10 males and 11 females, with an average age of 50.9 (14-76) years. After the relevant examination and evaluation of patients, they underwent percutaneous nerve evaluation (PNE). If patient experienced a good response to PNE after 2 or 3 weeks (≥50%), permanent SNS implantation was performed. The improvement of clinical symptoms and quality of life between the baseline, PNE, and latest follow-up time points were compared. Improvement of clinical symptoms, including autonomic stool frequency per week, autonomic stool days per week, defecation time, visual analogue scale (VAS, lower score indicates more serious symptoms) score and Cleveland clinic constipation score (CCCS, higher score indacates more serious symptoms) criteria. The change of quality of life was scored by SF-36 questionnaires (the higher score indicates better quality of life). Results: Of 21 patients, 18 (85.7%) experienced significant improvement in symptoms with PNE, and 2 patients discontinued treatment due to their dissatisfaction. Sixteen patients (76.2%) received permanent SNS implantation, two of whom underwent bilateral PNE implantation. These patients were followed-up for mean 56 (34-72) months. The treatment was continuously effective in 13 patients (61.9%), including 3 of ODS, 1 of STC and 9 of mixed constipation. Compared with baseline, the score of constipation patients receiving permanent SNS implantation at latest follow-up was shown. The median autonomic stool frequency per week increased from 1.0 (0-7) to 7.5 (0-10) (P<0.001), the median autonomic stool days per week increased from 1.0 (0-7) d to 4.5 (0-7) d (P<0.001), the median defecation time decreased from 19.0 (8-40) minutes to 4.0 (3-31) minutes (P<0.001), the median CCCS decreased from 20.0 (13-30) to 9.0 (6-30) (P<0.001), and the median VAS score increased from 9.0 (7-40) to 80.0 (15-90) (P<0.001). The values of the 8 parts of the SF-36 questionnaire increased (all P<0.05). Conclusion: SNS implantation is safe and has obvious effects on severe constipation with stable mid-term efficacy.

Functional evaluation after function-preserving gastrectomy / 中华胃肠外科杂志

With the increase of people's health awareness and the progress of medical diagostic technology in recent years, the diagnosis rate of early gastric cancer is increasing year by year. Although radical surgery has good efficacy, how to maximize the preservation of the normal anatomy and function of the stomach and improve the quality of life of patients in the pursuit of radical surgery has become a more important issue in the treatment of early gastric cancer. Under the condition of ensuring radical lymph node dissection, function-preserving gastrectomy can fully preserve gastric function by reducing the resection extent and preserving the pylorus and the vagus nerve, which has advantage of improving quality of life and has great potential in the treatment of early gastric cancer. However, there is no functional evaluation standard for function-preserving gastrectomy at present. Most of the patients are evaluated by quality of life scale, which is relatively subjective. Even though the evaluation of endoscopy, hematology and other objective means can indicate the benefit degree in quality of life brought by functional reconstruction, the evidence level is limited. Therefore, this paper discusses the research status of function-preserving gastrectomy evaluation, postoperative complications, postoperative nutritional status, auxiliary examination and other items in the evaluation of gastric function, and analyzes the prospects of research direction in this field.